* Malte S. Stretz [18.06.2009 19:30]:
> >
> > what are the size differences? did you try it out?
>
the discussion goes in the wrong way IMHO. It does'nt
really matter, if we get or loose _some_ kilobytes,
'ip' is definitily the way to go.
hey, we are not in the 90s anymore - and you can do
much
* Vasilis Tsiligiannis [18.06.2009 21:15]:
>
> Try removing 'route' too (-ifconfig-route+ip). 'route' can be replaced by
> 'ip'
> also, if this function is implemented in busybox.
-ifconfig -route -arp
+ip
bye, Bastian Bittorf
___
openwrt-devel mail
* Jo-Philipp Wich [18.06.2009 16:30]:
>
> In any case we should keep the stuff compatible with ifconfig/route.
for the first time: yes
but on the long run we should definitely kick
the oldskool-stuff, which is pretty awkward IMHO.
(but show a short hint, if somebody types 'ifconfig/router/arp')
On 18.06.2009 23:03, David A. Bandel wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Matthias Buecher / Germany
> wrote:
>> Hi Kloschi,
>>
>> doesn't work for me:
>> #1
>> http://wiki.openwrt.org/DropbearPublicKeyAuthenticationHowto
>> should result in
>> http://oldwiki.openwrt.org/DropbearPublicKeyAut
On Friday 19 June 2009 09:31:59 Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Vasilis Tsiligiannis [18.06.2009 21:15]:
> > Try removing 'route' too (-ifconfig-route+ip). 'route' can be replaced by
> > 'ip' also, if this function is implemented in busybox.
>
> -ifconfig -route -arp
> +ip
arp is already a oneliner in
* Malte S. Stretz [19.06.2009 11:00]:
>
> arp is already a oneliner in /etc/profile and not compiled into busybox per
> default.
this has nothing to do with the real arp command,
its just an quick and dirty "show the arp table", but
you cannot manipulate anything using /proc/net/arp.
> I agree
Hi!
> Try removing 'route' too (-ifconfig-route+ip). 'route' can be replaced by
> 'ip'
> also, if this function is implemented in busybox.
You are right. However I did that a few months ago and ran into problems
with Asterisk. For some strange reason it depends on it. Asterisk
doesn't connect t
* elektra [19.06.2009 12:15]:
>
> doesn't connect to other Asterisk servers if 'route' is missing.
therefore i implement a route() wrapper.
ATM i start at /etc/functions.sh but e.g.
asterisk does not use it. maybe it is a good
idea to make a symlink for /sbin/route|ifconfig|arp
to to wrapper at
On Friday 19 June 2009 12:52:26 Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * elektra [19.06.2009 12:15]:
> > doesn't connect to other Asterisk servers if 'route' is missing.
>
> therefore i implement a route() wrapper.
> ATM i start at /etc/functions.sh but e.g.
> asterisk does not use it. maybe it is a good
> idea
* Outback Dingo [18.06.2009 16:00]:
> i have some pretty unique environments here, want to send me the patch i can
> help with some testing
not a clean patch, but easy to install:
ssh r...@openwrtbox
cd /etc
wget -O - "http://intercity-vpn.de/files/functions.sh_addon"; >>functions.sh
wget http:/
* Malte S. Stretz [19.06.2009 13:15]:
>
> Maybe its just me, but the last few weeks I tried to grok the OpenWrt base-
> files scrips (and succeeded [1]) and my impression is that there is already a
> lot of stuff crammed into /etc/functions.sh which is sourced by almost
> everything but only us
This will update xtables-addons to version 1.17
It fixes some build problems like incompatible arguments for readlink
and changes for linux 2.6.30
Signed-off-by: Thomas Langer
---
Index: packages/net/xtables-addons/Makefile
===
--
Hallo Thomas,
Le Friday 19 June 2009 17:43:15 thomas.lan...@infineon.com, vous avez écrit :
> This will update xtables-addons to version 1.17
>
> It fixes some build problems like incompatible arguments for readlink
> and changes for linux 2.6.30
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Langer
>
It was already
Le Tuesday 09 June 2009 16:00:47 Michael Buesch, vous avez écrit :
> On Monday 08 June 2009 21:35:05 matthieu castet wrote:
> > Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > On Sunday 07 June 2009 11:28:50 matthieu castet wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I wonder with openwrt for bcm47xx is not build with "-msoft-flo
Le Wednesday 10 June 2009 05:10:05 Dan Brown, vous avez écrit :
> > On Monday 08 June 2009 21:35:05 matthieu castet wrote:
> >> Michael Buesch wrote:
> >> > On Sunday 07 June 2009 11:28:50 matthieu castet wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> I wonder with openwrt for bcm47xx is not build with "-msoft
On Friday 19 June 2009 18:20:53 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le Tuesday 09 June 2009 16:00:47 Michael Buesch, vous avez écrit :
> > On Monday 08 June 2009 21:35:05 matthieu castet wrote:
> > > Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 07 June 2009 11:28:50 matthieu castet wrote:
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
>
>> > > Any comments, ideas, flames? I'm also hanging around on #openwrt as
>> > > moonflux.
Hello Malte,
Just a quick flame to have fun ;)
I see you are doing IPv4 and IPv6 firewall, it is very nice and I'm a
IPv6 supporter as well.
However, before using an IPv6 firewall I'd like to be able to
On Friday 19 June 2009 18:43:36 ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:
>[...]
> However, before using an IPv6 firewall I'd like to be able to assign
> IPv6 addresses to my router !
>
> But how do you assign IPv6 addresses at boot ?
I use tunnels, no static addresses.
> Can you reproduce this bug ?
> htt
I loaded openwrt svn 16516 on my TEW-652BRP and noticed that I was getting
random MAC addresses assigned:
ar71xx: using random MAC address for eth0
ar71xx: using random MAC address for eth1
My investigation of this lead me to examine the following files:
target/linux/ar71xx/files
2009/6/19 Michael Buesch :
> On Friday 19 June 2009 18:20:53 Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Le Tuesday 09 June 2009 16:00:47 Michael Buesch, vous avez écrit :
>> > On Monday 08 June 2009 21:35:05 matthieu castet wrote:
>> > > Michael Buesch wrote:
>> > > > On Sunday 07 June 2009 11:28:50 matthieu caste
20 matches
Mail list logo
