Hello members,
Although, I am compiling and using custom OpenWRT images since 8 months
now, but I am still confused with this particular behaviour. I am using
it primarily on x86 Alix APU devices.
Everytime I run a make and kernel gets recompiled, it changes the hex
value appended to the kernel
Adds IPIP tunnel support to netifd.
Following IPIP tunnel parameters can be configured :
-peeraddr (IPv4 remote address)
-ipaddr (IPv4 local address)
-mtu (IPIP tunnel mtu)
-ttl (time to live of encapsulting packets)
-tos (type of service either inherit (outer header inherits the
The package supports IP in IP by registering the ipip protocol handler
Following options are configurable
-peeraddr (IPv4 remote address)
-ipaddr (IPv4 local address)
-ttl (time to live of encapsulating packet)
-tos (type of service of encapsulating packet either inherit (outer
On 30/03/14 06:29 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 02:24:44PM -0400, Weedy wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Dave Täht dave.t...@bufferbloat.netwrote:
From: Dave Taht dave.t...@bufferbloat.net
This adds support for the bufferbloat project's Smart Queue Management
(SQM)
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Nishant Sharma codemarau...@gmail.com wrote:
Although, I am compiling and using custom OpenWRT images since 8 months
now, but I am still confused with this particular behaviour. I am using
it primarily on x86 Alix APU devices.
Everytime I run a make and kernel
I'm trying to use uqmi with a Sierra Wireless MC7354 and MC7750. On both
modules I'm able to bring up a connection to the cell network, but cannot send
or receive anything on the wwan0 interface. After much digging I found an
option for libqmi that specifies using ethernet headers instead of
we noticed that qmi is not working properly today and are working on a fix.
John
On 01/10/2014 21:12, Spam Catcher wrote:
I'm trying to use uqmi with a Sierra Wireless MC7354 and MC7750. On
both modules I'm able to bring up a connection to the cell network, but
cannot send or receive
Hi Steven,
Thx for the feedback. I will create a new patch which unifies the
creation of both tunnel types; my initial approach was a bit
conservative as I did not want to impact the feature set of the sit
type (eg TOS support)
Br,
Hans
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Steven Barth
messing around earlier and it seems that running either of make
clean or make dirclean first does a prepare-tmpinfo and loads up
the tmp/ directory, only to remove it all immediately afterwards.
as Exhibit A, i have a totally clean openwrt checkout, in which i
did the following:
$ make V=s
Hi,
OpenWRT is a wonderfull piece of open source code, and it would be really
great if the project management could be as open as the code.
BB should be out now but for an unknow reason, it's not, and it's
frustating.
If some feature are missing, let people know.
If some bugs need to be killed,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/14 14:31, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
When you activate/deactivate packages in menuconfig, it may modify
what gets compiled into the kernel, to add/remove support for the
various subsystems needed by the packages you build. This will
On 2 October 2014 04:45:38 GMT+05:30, Gui Iribarren g...@altermundi.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/14 14:31, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
When you activate/deactivate packages in menuconfig, it may modify
what gets compiled into the kernel, to add/remove support
How good is the throughput on CeroWrt compared to OpenWrt ?
On Oct 2, 2014 9:55 AM, Dave Taht dave.t...@bufferbloat.net wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 12:10:46PM -0400, Weedy wrote:
On 30/03/14 06:29 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 02:24:44PM -0400, Weedy wrote:
On Sat, Mar
no its certainly farting. i have you 2 and about 1 other person
complain. the other 95% sent me mails with nice and simple questions and
input and so forth.
i just had a look, yesterday i got related to BB
* 8 thank you mails
* 6 mails asking for various support things
* 4 pkg maintainers ask
14 matches
Mail list logo
