On 21-04-21, Perry wrote:
> Now that openwrt-21.02-rc1 is tagged, would it be possible to have an
> "openwrt-21.02" section for the Reported Version on bugs.openwrt.org?
> While at it, why is it still possible to file bug reports for lede-17.01?
Good catch, thanks. I have
eed reporting
>>
>> With those 3 patches 21.02 matches master with the big ubus dsl metric
>> change.
>
> I added these 3 patches, but only after tagging.
>
> We should do a 21.02.0-rc2 in 2 to 3 weeks anyway.
>
> Hauke
>
>
On 19/04/2021 23:26, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
On 4/19/21 8:59 AM, Andre Heider wrote:
On 19/04/2021 08:51, Florian Eckert wrote:
Hello,
If there are some other bugs in the 21.02 branch which are fixed in
master, we can backport the fixed as long as they are not so big. If
there is something
On 4/19/21 8:59 AM, Andre Heider wrote:
On 19/04/2021 08:51, Florian Eckert wrote:
Hello,
If there are some other bugs in the 21.02 branch which are fixed in
master, we can backport the fixed as long as they are not so big. If
there is something missing, just ask on the mainling list.
Since
On 4/18/21 3:11 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 4/7/21 12:29 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> How do we want to go forward with OpenWrt 21.02-rc1?
>>
>> * I think the base system is ok.
>> * The http (original wolfssl) problem reported by jow is fi
18, 2021 at 4:15 PM Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
> On 4/7/21 12:29 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > How do we want to go forward with OpenWrt 21.02-rc1?
> >
> > * I think the base system is ok.
> > * The http (original wolfssl) problem reported by j
On 19/04/2021 08:51, Florian Eckert wrote:
Hello,
If there are some other bugs in the 21.02 branch which are fixed in
master, we can backport the fixed as long as they are not so big. If
there is something missing, just ask on the mainling list.
Since last weekend the following patch was
Hello,
If there are some other bugs in the 21.02 branch which are fixed in
master, we can backport the fixed as long as they are not so big. If
there is something missing, just ask on the mainling list.
Since last weekend the following patch was merged into master.
The patch extends ltq-vdsl
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Hauke Mehrtens
> Sent: Sonntag, 18. April 2021 15:12
> To: OpenWrt Development List
> Cc: Jo-Philipp Wich
> Subject: Re: OpenWrt 21.02-rc1
>
> On 4/7/
On 4/7/21 12:29 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
Hi,
How do we want to go forward with OpenWrt 21.02-rc1?
* I think the base system is ok.
* The http (original wolfssl) problem reported by jow is fixed
* LuCI in the 21.02 branch still misses DSA support, this was merged
into master some time ago
On 08/04/2021 11:14, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
2) dsl_control [status|lucistat] was changed with dsl reporting removed
https://forum.openwrt.org/t/openwrt-21-02-dsl-control/89962/22
I understand the reason behind this change. I had to write my own command line
reporting and adapt batch data
ot be
> difficult to reproduce "status" and "lucistat" functionality.
>
>
> On 06/04/2021, 23:37, "openwrt-devel on behalf of Hauke Mehrtens"
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How do we want to go forward with OpenWrt 21.02-rc1?
>
> * I thin
now).
I wonder why backward compatibility was not considered as it would not be
difficult to reproduce "status" and "lucistat" functionality.
On 06/04/2021, 23:37, "openwrt-devel on behalf of Hauke Mehrtens"
wrote:
Hi,
How do we want to go forward wi
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 2021-04-07 20:07, John
Hi,
Op donderdag 8 april 2021 om 8u35 schreef Bjørn Mork :
Stijn Segers writes:
A vote for keeping the realtek target here, I have three devices
here
in production. Very happy with them. The main catch I see with
relegating the realtek target to master would be less uptake on the
end
Stijn Segers writes:
> A vote for keeping the realtek target here, I have three devices here
> in production. Very happy with them. The main catch I see with
> relegating the realtek target to master would be less uptake on the
> end user side (not everyone will want to run hardware that needs
Hi,
Do we want to keep the realtek and mediatek targets in the 21.02
branch and release or do we want to remove them link the ipq807x target?
Hauke
keep them for sure. I am running my network on those 2 targets using 21.02
John
___
Hi Hauke,
Op woensdag 7 april 2021 om 22u27 schreef Hauke Mehrtens
:
On 4/7/21 12:29 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
Hi,
How do we want to go forward with OpenWrt 21.02-rc1?
* I think the base system is ok.
* The http (original wolfssl) problem reported by jow is fixed
* LuCI in the 21.02 branch
Hi Hauke,
Op woensdag 7 april 2021 om 23u58 schreef Hauke Mehrtens
:
On 4/7/21 12:29 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
Hi,
How do we want to go forward with OpenWrt 21.02-rc1?
* I think the base system is ok.
* The http (original wolfssl) problem reported by jow is fixed
* LuCI in the 21.02 branch
On 4/7/21 12:29 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
Hi,
How do we want to go forward with OpenWrt 21.02-rc1?
* I think the base system is ok.
* The http (original wolfssl) problem reported by jow is fixed
* LuCI in the 21.02 branch still misses DSA support, this was merged
into master some time ago
Re:WireGuard - fine by me. Thanks for doing that.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On 4/7/21 12:29 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
Hi,
How do we want to go forward with OpenWrt 21.02-rc1?
* I think the base system is ok.
* The http (original wolfssl) problem reported by jow is fixed
* LuCI in the 21.02 branch still misses DSA support, this was merged
into master some time ago
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:43 PM Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> If there are some other bugs in the 21.02 branch which are fixed in
> master, we can backport the fixed as long as they are not so big. If
> there is something missing, just ask on the mainling list.
>
Hi!
I have a oneliner
On 07.04.21 12:16, Bas Mevissen via openwrt-devel wrote:
Will Wifi 6 support be added to the interface? We have some support
for a couple of AX routers, so it would be nice if they can work
without manually tweaking things.
The underlying structure seems to support it already:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 7:30 PM Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How do we want to go forward with OpenWrt 21.02-rc1?
>
> * I think the base system is ok.
> * The http (original wolfssl) problem reported by jow is fixed
> * LuCI in the 21.02 branch still misses DSA
On 2021-04-07 12:01, Hannu Nyman wrote:
Hauke Mehrtens kirjoitti 7.4.2021 klo 1.29:
Hi,
How do we want to go forward with OpenWrt 21.02-rc1?
* I think the base system is ok.
* The http (original wolfssl) problem reported by jow is fixed
* LuCI in the 21.02 branch still misses DSA support
AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
Hi,
How do we want to go forward with OpenWrt 21.02-rc1?
* I think the base system is ok.
* The http (original wolfssl) problem reported by jow is fixed
* LuCI in the 21.02 branch still misses DSA support, this was merged
into master some time ago as far as I underst
Hauke Mehrtens kirjoitti 7.4.2021 klo 1.29:
Hi,
How do we want to go forward with OpenWrt 21.02-rc1?
* I think the base system is ok.
* The http (original wolfssl) problem reported by jow is fixed
* LuCI in the 21.02 branch still misses DSA support, this was merged into
master some time ago
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 5:33 PM Ilya Lipnitskiy
wrote:
>
> Hi Hauke,
>
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:43 PM Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > How do we want to go forward with OpenWrt 21.02-rc1?
> >
> > * I think the base system is ok.
> >
Hi Hauke,
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:43 PM Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How do we want to go forward with OpenWrt 21.02-rc1?
>
> * I think the base system is ok.
> * The http (original wolfssl) problem reported by jow is fixed
> * LuCI in the 21.02 branch
Hi,
How do we want to go forward with OpenWrt 21.02-rc1?
* I think the base system is ok.
* The http (original wolfssl) problem reported by jow is fixed
* LuCI in the 21.02 branch still misses DSA support, this was merged
into master some time ago as far as I understood.
Jow reported
31 matches
Mail list logo
