On 16.06.2014 10:40, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Steven Barth cy...@openwrt.org wrote:
Hi Nikos,
Is there a reason for not having dnssec by default? If there is a way
to disable it, I believe it will only be beneficial to have it in.
The main problem
On 16.06.2014 11:56, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:53 AM, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
On the contrary I'd prefer if it doesn't. Nettle is an open project
under LGPL that anyone can contribute and can be reused by a variety
of software; polarssl is closed commercial
On 11.10.2014 20:40, document wrote:
hi,
how to troubleshoot openwrt crash(reboot) ?
i have openvpn-2.3.2 installed from opkg but when i manually start it about
1min passed, router (openwrt-12.09) will reboot.
when i enabled openvpn service on startup, router will auto reboot forever.
On 29.02.2012 12:24, cl...@bit63.org wrote:
In this case I am not sure what the best course of action is.
What is the OpenWRT way to enable kernel options that aren't kernel modules?
you can add a simple config var to your Makefile, like
CONFIG_KERNEL_*=y
these are automatically translated to
On 19.03.2012 10:52, Christiane Ruetten wrote:
Hi,
would you be able to easily add a variant of the lighttpd
package without the massive libopenssl dependency? It is almost
completely filling up the flash in 4 MByte routers, leaving
almost no headroom for further functionality, and https
Maybe you are lucky and someone steps up. You are probably better of finding
the maintainer (if there's one) directly by looking at the revision log or
asking in the openwrt irc channel. The mailing list is often slow in this
regard. If it all does not happen in time frame you planned in then
had a look at irssi. does this actually work when both packages are selected?
don't you end up with two packages both containing whatever was build first?
..ede
On 19.03.2012 13:18, Peter Wagner wrote:
Hi,
look at the ctorrent or irssi Makefile. There you can see how to implement
the
this is different from client to client. if unsure or unable to fix it simply
attach the patch to the email. this way it will survive whatever comes. people
on this mailing list like the patches inline for commenting, but heck.. if it
does not work out for you, simply attach it (for usage)
On 17.12.2013 16:14, Yousong Zhou wrote:
On 17 December 2013 22:13, openwrt-de...@couprie.net
openwrt-de...@couprie.net wrote:
Hi yousong,
Can you give a example how to call menuconfig for busybox ?
I am doing menuconfig for busybox in OpenWrt build environment in
which busybox tarball
On 15.01.2013 16:41, Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
Le 12/01/2013 16:08, darius a écrit :
Hello,
Simple question for those who know. I do 'make kernel_menuconfig' then
select some needed features in kernel and then do 'make -j3' in topdir.
After image is done, I install it on the router, but my
On 27.02.2013 15:33, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hello,
On 01/31/2013 09:11 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello,
I just got a mailer daemon notice that open...@slickdeals.endjunk.com
didn't get this mail because the mail server for its domain couldn't be
connected by mine.
Who cares for the
On 06.03.2013 19:40, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:33:44PM +0100, a...@mykolab.com wrote:
The TL-WR841ND may very well be a good choice. You can also consider
the TL-WR1043ND, it has solid support (I have had about four of them and
tested rather heavily over time). It
On 31.05.2013 13:48, devendra.aaru wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Bastian Bittorf bitt...@bluebottle.com
wrote:
* devendra.aaru devendra.a...@gmail.com [31.05.2013 13:44]:
The patch i generated spans upto 1M as since it contains the source
code of iozone and i bit modified it since
On 13.08.2013 21:54, Jeff Remy wrote:
Hi,
I have a question regarding the UCI Lua bindings license.
libuci itself is LGPLv2.1, the cli utility is GPLv2 and the Lua
bindings are GPLv2.
I was wondering if this was on purpose?
It does not seem to be in line with the library but again, there
Could you post your makefile here?.. ede
On 12.05.2011 02:02, John Zavgren wrote:
Thanks, Christian:
I read the article on the wiki and then I tried make
package/vislinkRcv/compile from the TOPDIR (vislinkRcv is the stuff that I'm
developing) and no KLM was actually built. When I do the
isn't it build in the build_dir or just not installed? i see no install
definition in your makefile. as jow wrote
f you can you should consider packaging your source as an out-of-tree
module, see for example the KernelPackage / kmod defintions in
package/wprobe/Makefile .
ede
On 12.05.2011
so where does a (in buildroot root)
$ make package/pkg/{clean,compile} V=99
leave you?... attach the output or pastebin it .. also check if the new binary
is created in builddir
..ede
On 12.05.2011 16:08, John Zavgren wrote:
It get's built and staged when I do a global make.
I want a
welcome.. you could also manually remove builddir. buildroot is putting files
in builddir (.prepared and the like). this is to circumvent to
prepare,rebuild,install something again (e.g. when recompile an image with one
added pkg added in menuconfig).
keep that in mind and you are set for
On 24.05.2011 20:03, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
P.S.
Please, don't top post :)
why shouldn't he? it's not like you couldn't understand his message, is it?
..ede
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
On 24.05.2011 21:12, Peter Wagner wrote:
i think its more about - he asks me in a polite way not to toppost :)
and if someone asks in a nice way - you can see what you can get ;)
he did indeed. probably i just overreact on this. it's like somebody is telling
how to talk (in which order)... i
works for me on a asus wl-500w.
thanks, ede
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On 10.06.2011 08:43, harish badrinath wrote:
Hello,
If i have a package called foo, How do it specify in its Makefile
(package/foo/Makefile) that it conflicts with / replaces a package
called bar. When that happens the compilation is aborted until package
bar is deselected.
try what
continuing my daily release cycle here comes
CTS (coordinate transfomation services) Extension, stable until proven
otherwise, translated into english, german, spanish, italian
Geometry Converter Extension 0.3rc2 fixing a bug where it simply did nothing if
an older version of my other
... sorry again ede
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On 29.08.2011 16:14, Jan Willies wrote:
Hi Luka,
2011/8/21 Luka Perkov open...@lukaperkov.net mailto:open...@lukaperkov.net
define Package/openvpn
SECTION:=net
CATEGORY:=Network
+ SUBMENU:=VPN
DEPENDS:=+kmod-tun +libopenssl +PACKAGE_openvpn_complzo:liblzo
On 29.08.2011 16:44, Jan Willies wrote:
2011/8/29 edgar.sol...@web.de mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de
On 29.08.2011 16 tel:29.08.2011%2016:14, Jan Willies wrote:
Hi Luka,
2011/8/21 Luka Perkov open...@lukaperkov.net
mailto:open...@lukaperkov.net mailto:open...@lukaperkov.net
On 29.08.2011 17:14, Jonas Gorski wrote:
On 29 August 2011 17:04, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
On 29.08.2011 16:44, Jan Willies wrote:
2011/8/29 edgar.sol...@web.de mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de
On 29.08.2011 16 tel:29.08.2011%2016:14, Jan Willies wrote:
Hi Luka,
2011/8/21
On 29.08.2011 18:17, Luka Perkov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:32:10PM +0200, Jan Willies wrote:
2011/8/29 edgar.sol...@web.de
right missed that. and yes reversing would be most elegant. ede
I don't see why reversing would be most elegant. Now you can fully tweak
your openvpn package.
On 02.09.2011 12:39, Luka Perkov wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:46:37AM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On Friday 02 September 2011 00:55:54 Luka Perkov wrote:
Also in linux-2.6.39.4/kernel/Kconfig.preempt you will see for
CONFIG_PREEMPT:
Select this if you are building a kernel
On 20.09.2011 13:56, bifferos wrote:
I'd like to provide a binary build of OpenWrt packages, however I want to
comply with the terms of the GPL. I figured the most obvious thing to do
would be to copy the way OpenWrt does things. I'm not convinced that OpenWrt
complies with the GPL with
On 11.11.2011 20:51, Mike Brady wrote:
Can someone tell be or direct me to an example of how to put a linux version
conditional into an OpenWrt package Makefile please?
What I want to do is say if this is and version of Linux 2.4 then do stufft.
I've tried something like
ifeq
for the unaware
http://code.google.com/p/reaver-wps/
somebody created a package Makefile for reaver in the forum
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=152639
..ede
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
On 23.02.2012 19:21, John Crispin wrote:
dd-wrt webif
on openwrt? ..ede
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Attached you will find a new admin package, which contains a hotplug script for
switching wifi on/off if the router has a ses button. This is
readymade and tested for wrt54g(s,l) and wl500w models. Makefile is provided.
Youre welcome to integrate it in the packages feed, as it is very openwrt
Hi all,
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/5256
is still open and waiting for check in.
thanks ede
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hi all,
2 months ago I created the following ticket.
https://dev.openwrt.org/attachment/ticket/5256/
It announces a new ses button wifi switch script.
I assume it was not added because of the inappropriate format. Today I
added a patch to the ticket which holds the new package changes against
Hello Jow and Felix and all developers.
Is there any reason that this new package
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/5256
is whether commented nor committed to trunk?
I also announced it 2 times on this list.
Thanks ede
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Hello Jow and Felix and all developers.
Is there any reason that this new package
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/5256
is whether commented nor committed to trunk?
This is the 4th submission on this topic. Please somebody answer.
Thanks ede
___
I recall having similar issues when using a recent trunk compiled image
(after the kernel upgrade) and trying to use a kmod package from the
8.09.1 repository ... I guess it's the kernel version.
ede
On 20.10.2009 12:33, ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:
# opkg install kmod-sched
Collected
I checked the trunk version of wifi and calling wifi up or just
wifi is the same. This means that this script can't enable
connection that have the wifi disabled at the config file. Also that
is impossible to use a default off on power up.
true .. that can only be achieved by toggling the uci
probably the question if you want to enable kernel float emulation.
QUESTIONs:
Is there a way to disable this prompt?
How do I enable a softfloat in the toolchain?
Thanks ede
Hi Timo,
Am 22.11.2009 12:11, schrieb Timo Juhani Lindfors:
and strace -p ... confirmed that the last process was
You manage the openwrt svn by a git interface?
.. ede
I don't know how you can force svn to generate proper patches - I use
git and it's better at handling such things.
- Felix
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Hi all,
find attached two patches that fix a wrong categorizations for the
mentioned packages.
libpar2 belongs in libraries
rdiff-backup in utilities
Thanks ede
Index: feeds/packages/libs/libpar2/Makefile
===
---
Hi all,
the attached patch bumps strongswan 2.8 for 2.4 kernels to latest
version 2.8.11 and fixes a compile error because of the missing circleq
implementation in uclibc.
regards ede
PS: can somebody point me to a good guide to set up strongswan with
pptpd on openwrt? Thanks.
Index:
the change to uci_firewall.sh omitted the necessary variables for the
/etc/firewall.user script and the like. This patch adds them again.
regards ede
Index: package/firewall/files/uci_firewall.sh
===
---
I copied it over from 7.09's /etc/init.d/firewall init script ... and it
worked for my script.. LAV doesn't seem to be set there. Would you like
me to add LANDEV?
.. ede
On 09.12.2009 19:15, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shouldn't you add LANDEV too?
well, it wouldn't hurt and maybe somebody might need it in the future.
Also maybe some other variables for wireless and the like. But, I have
problems to figure out where the scripts gets the network values from.
It's not in the general nvram vars available by 'uci show'.
... ede
On
you are right vasilis .. I just tried it with syslog-ng3 ..
the syslog-ng manual also states
page 38
On Linux, the klogd daemon can be used in addition to syslog-ng to read
kernel messages and forward them to syslog-ng.
klogd used to preprocess kernel messages to resolve symbols etc., but as
find attached a patch that updates iptables to recent version 1.4.6.
Modified are the imq patch and the Makefile to resemble changes in
iptables. I moved the patches back into the ./patches folder as there is
no reason anymore to keep them in ./patches/version
although I used git to create
these patches are unanswered/pending
bump pptpd to 1.3.4, minor fixes
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2009-December/005409.html
bump iptables to 1.4.6
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2009-December/005423.html
regards ede
I still object to the inclusion of this patch. At least for syslog-ng3.
The developers of syslog-ng clearly state in their
http://www.balabit.com/dl/guides/syslog-ng-v3.0-guide-admin-en.pdf
that
/proc/kmsg should not be opened with pipe driver, but with file() instead
and also
log_prefix is
Original Message
Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] ping on patches for pptpd and iptables
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:49:55 +0100
From: edgar.sol...@web.de
Reply-To: OpenWrt Development List openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
To: OpenWrt Development List openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
these
On 26.01.2010 09:29, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
Ticket #6575: Patch for brcm47xx, hopefully it will boot again. Working
The patch is for brcm-2.4 ?
..ede
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
(stability)
Quite a chunk of code. Did you write it from scratch?
How thoroughly is this tested by now?
Does this work with kernel 2.4? Lot's of users are stuck to these kernels.
(packaging)
I don't mean to be picky, but wouldn't it make sense to keep code that
depends on specific package with
Is there a sync command before the unmount?
Maybe the system does not reach the umount call, and therefor it is
never cleanly unmounted? You could debug that.
Maybe the controller is caching and needs specific commands to write the
cache to disc? Did you search the web?
good luck, ede
On
At a quick glance it looks promising. I understand the need of the
copyright notice. I am no core developer but I guess you would have to
license the files under GPL2 by adding the appropriate notice.
Any file including existing GPL2 code would have to be licensed GPL2 anyway.
Will try it out
This is kind of difficult as the internal flashes are usually very
small. A dd read write of 2MB is not really a test. But generally I
guess the probably very little speed difference is worth the space
saved. I guess it is little because there is no optimization switch for
speed.
ede
On
The swap parts should be part of base files. The needed swapon/off could
come from util-linux or busybox.
.. ede
On 07.02.2010 07:00, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
This time with the patch
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 00:58 -0500, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
Hi all,
Here is the automount patch I've been
Any idea how to measure boot time? I don't have serial console access. ede
On 08.02.2010 11:14, Bas Mevissen wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 18:00 +0100, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote:
How will this affect performance (the opposite side of compression)?
If it does, then it would be great if
On second thought I actually think it would make sense to clarify the
following points before taking any action. Not that I expected anything
to happen soon ;)
1. How is the compression evaluated. On per file or per file system
basis. I couldn't really find docs telling this. Any hint
On 09.02.2010 06:12, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 16:26 +0100, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
What do you think of packaging hotplug automount separately? Now that
it's that sophisticated it takes several kilobytes of space. Space that
is valuable to users without non-usb-routers.
install a theme. For some reason they are not automatically selected.
Annoying all the time ;)
.. ede
On 10.02.2010 10:59, Iwan Budi Kusnanto wrote:
Hi All,
I managed to compile install openwrt for avila gateworks.
But, i can't install the luci web interface.
These are what i do :
- In make
Can you send a 'opkg list_installed' ?
Which platform you are on ?
ede
On 11.02.2010 04:43, Iwan Budi Kusnanto wrote:
edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
install a theme. For some reason they are not automatically selected.
Annoying all the time ;)
I did. it is automatically selected. I use kamikaze
On 12.02.2010 22:13, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
I think the packaging needs the following properties:
1) scripts for functionality (e.g. uuid and label, using blkid) are
automatically installed if the main block-mount (as I've called) is
installed, and the dependency is satisfied (.e.g if
I'd rather keep them optional, that's why the log tells if it misses blkid.
Actually it doesn't. And it's only automatically selected if the base
block-mount package is selected, so it is optional, but you don't have
to worry about individual dependencies, and things work as expected
Lets start here
OpenWrt does not currently run on devices which have 2MB or less of
flash memory. This limitation will probably not be worked around since
those devices are most of the time micro-routers, or Wireless Access
Points, which are not the main OpenWrt target.
This reads to me only
(thanks for http://pastehtml.com/view/5tfitwd.html)
Nice. Where does this come from? .. Is it dynamically updated?
.. ede
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On 19.02.2010 16:47, Bas Mevissen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 16:24 +0100, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
The Asus WL520GC I just bought is running Linux. It has 2MB of flash.
Wow, I assumed that out of the box, these devices with a small amount of
flash did not run Linux. That was true in the past
out of interest, whats the advance/difference to the openssh one?
... ede
On 19.02.2010 16:02, Raphaël HUCK wrote:
Hi,
this patch adds geftpserver package.
This server is taken from
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/sftpserver/index.html
It will need the patch to add bzr support to
This reads to me only as not primary target. Not as in we do not
support that.
The point is that no developer will care whether OpenWrt runs on 2MB
flash and no efforts are made to make sure that the system remains
usable with only 2MB - I think this qualifies as unsupported, it may
work, if it
well, How about one big additional storage package then? Additionally
enabling swapon and blkid from busybox?
This also makes it easier to maintain. There is enough stuff already in
base files.
One or two packages is the solution we'll be going for, with swapon and
blkid enabled in
Indeed. The only difference is that there is no predefined config for
such small targets, so you have to manually select the part of busybox
you want to strip, and similarly for the kernel config.
You should be able to get pretty close to DD-WRT's config, while still
benefitting from
Let's keep it simple and backward compatible.
Change new config to ports but also add old port setting to this list.
Something like:
config_get ports ${section} Ports
config_get port ${section} Port
ports=$port $ports
Perfect of course would be a log message telling deprecation of port
setting
When you have an old working trunk version you can try to narrow down
the changeset that broke trunk. Check out revisions, compile, flash and
test.
Efficient is trying the circa middle between known broken and known
working revision. When broken then raise known broken revision. When
it's working
Don't missunderstand me please:
I say switch to ports but don't break old configs by means of keeping
port working in the background, maybe supported with a deprecation
message for users with old config ;)
.. ede
On 28.02.2010 13:40, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote:
To me that's even more
Highlights:
* brcm-2.4 updated to 2.4.37 kernel
why not recent 2.4.39, the 2.4 kernel doesn't have major changes anymore
but some more bugfixes
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/ChangeLog-2.4.37.9
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/ChangeLog-2.4.37.8
when I tried it
Kernel is already the latest, 2.4.37.9.
http://downloads.openwrt.org/backfire/10.03-beta/brcm-2.4/packages/kernel_2.4.37.9-1_brcm-2.4.ipk
well done .. ede
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
this patch adds
logging of kernel messages to the config file
upgrades to latest version 3.0.5
Thanks Ede
Index: feeds/packages/admin/syslog-ng3/files/syslog-ng.conf
===
--- feeds/packages/admin/syslog-ng3/files/syslog-ng.conf
hi jow, just a friendly reminder .. Thanks ede
Original Message
Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] add vars for uci firewall include scripts
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:00:37 +0100
From: edgar.sol...@web.de
Reply-To: OpenWrt Development List openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
To: OpenWrt
there seem to be some leftovers from
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/6257
this patch fixes the descriptions of kmod package ipt-conntrack
Thanks ede
Index: package/kernel/modules/netfilter.mk
===
---
Seems like chore's block mount fsck patches didn't make it into trunk.
the rest seems to be there ..
Regards ede
Original Message
Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] block-*; the right one this time :-/
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:29:02 -0500
From: Daniel Dickinson csh...@csolve.net
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/20299
breaks compatibility to svn version before 1.6, when it was introduced.
error:
Checking out files from the svn repository...
svn: invalid option: --trust-server-cert
Type 'svn help' for usage.
Regards ede
___
and again .. a reminder of the reminder .. thanks ede
Original Message
hi jow, just a friendly reminder .. Thanks ede
Original Message
Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] add vars for uci firewall include scripts
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:00:37 +0100
From:
Apropos custom rules .. this patch is still pending .. ede
On 15.04.2010 15:02, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Remaining problem is access to the dsl modem, a new zone should be
created to allow masquerading, and I don't see how eth0.1 could be in
wan
You did earlier (9.12.2009) ..
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2009-December/005384.html
anyway you are right. They can be pulled manually as well. These vars
were set in white russian, but didn't survive kamikaze. I feel they
are convenient.
LANDEV is missing because it
On 03.05.2010 15:59, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
On Mon, 3 May 2010 09:35:59 +
Vasilis Tsiligiannisb_tsiligian...@silverton.gr wrote:
+ [ -c /dev/watchdog ] echo V /dev/watchdog
Why is this needed? busybox watchdog applet writes the magic on shutdown.
What is magic? In this
That's how it works. Y adds kernel modules to the kernel, and programs
to the image.
..ede
On 09.05.2010 18:10, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote:
In 'make menuconfig' I included them with 'Y' instead of 'M'.
According to my (newbie) knowledge that adds them to the kernel image.
Can somebody
true, my bad, actually one can see it in the end of a make run, how the
packages (incl. kmods) are installed to the image filesystem.
thanks ede
On 09.05.2010 18:19, Bernhard Loos wrote:
Actually, Y in menuconfig doesn't add the modules into the kernel,
they will still be kernel modules. It
there is partly in
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/include/kernel-defaults.mk
line 101
you can actually add
CONFIG_KERNEL_*
entries to your .config and they are copied over as CONFIG_* to the
kernel config. All that's missing is a menuconfig interface for that.
But at least for routers
but wouldn't the increase in the kernel image actually equal the
decrease in the squash image and therefore the size of the rootfs_data
stay the same? Both are lzma compressed.
..ede
On 10.05.2010 19:16, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote:
It may not downsize the packages themselves, but moving
are these sizes fixed or calculated according the space requirement?
Looks like the linux size is fixed, what is the maximum size for a
kernel on wrt54g?
.. ede
On 10.05.2010 23:28, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote:
Kernel and rootfs are in two different mtd partitions on the WRT54G:
# dmesg
Then it'd make total sense to stuff in whatever fits there .. thanks for
the enlightenment, ede
On 10.05.2010 23:38, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote:
The linux partition spans over the kernel and the complete rootfs for
flashing.
The maximum kernel size is 0x000bc000 (begin of rootfs) minus
On 10.05.2010 23:47, Bernhard Loos wrote:
2010/5/10 Bernhard Loos bernhardl...@googlemail.com:
2010/5/10 Matthias Buecher / Germany m...@maddes.net:
The linux partition spans over the kernel and the complete rootfs for
flashing.
The maximum kernel size is 0x000bc000 (begin of rootfs) minus
On 11.05.2010 17:25, Stefan Monnier wrote:
but wouldn't the increase in the kernel image actually equal the
decrease in the squash image and therefore the size of the rootfs_data
stay the same? Both are lzma compressed.
I expect that a kernel with some modules built-in will be smaller
(both in
You need to use kernel 2.6.
Enable
menuconfig-Global build settings-Compile the kernel with profiling enabled
then enable
menuconfig-Development-oprofile
Don't forget to recompile the kernel.
ede
On 24.05.2010 11:13, oii...@aol.com wrote:
thank you, I couldn't find the oprofile option in
...@latuviitta.fimailto:jukka.rahko...@latuviitta.fi
wrote:
Edgar Soldin wrote:
On 08.06.2010 16:48, Larry Becker wrote:
Seems like GPSylon is a large program and you only need the
small
portion ( gpsinput library?) that communicates with GPS
devices
sweet, simple and effective. You should put the example configuration on
the wiki as well for others suffering the symptoms.
thanks ede
On 16.07.2010 21:57, mickey wrote:
Hello,
this patch extends the dnsmasq initscript with an option for bogus-nxdomain.
From the manpage:
-B,
I am tired of antivirus detecting viruses in the oj.exe windows starter. We
can't send to each and every of them that it is a false positive every time.
Solution:
We have a working batch file starter. Having a second starter is a) confusing
and b) unfortunately unsettling users with virus
Wrong list .. sorry, please ignore .. ede
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
The reasons for a unified java launcher would be
- java, which most contributors should understand
- one ini file for all architectures
- one routine to replace them all ;) (set classpath, build cmd line)
sounds worth it to me.
..ede
On 01.09.2010 17:34, Larry Becker wrote:
It doesn't seem
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
