org
Cc: Jørgen Kvalsvik; Atgeirr Rasmussen
Subject: Re: [Opm] Difference between WellState::perfRates and
WellStateFullyImplicitBlackoil::perfPhaseRates
On Monday, September 26, 2016 12:35:09 PM Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
> Quick tip on how to convert from surface rate to reservoir rate?
simple answe
sep. 2016 kl. 14.10 skrev Jørgen Kvalsvik
<jo...@statoil.com<mailto:jo...@statoil.com>>:
Hi,
What's the difference between these two vectors? Is perfRates just the sum of
the pair/triples in perfPhaseRates?
---
T
Hi,
What's the difference between these two vectors? Is perfRates just the sum of
the pair/triples in perfPhaseRates?
---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any
You need to 'cd' into the build directory:
mkdir build
cd build
cmake ../devel
From: Opm on behalf of XiaoYun Wang
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 7:36:50 AM
To: opm@opm-project.org
Subject: [Opm] ERT cmake
The support for custom vectors is rather non-existent still unfortunately, but
if it's something that's useful to you during testing you can quickly patch
opm-output to do it for your case. Would that work for you?
Fra: Opm [opm-boun...@opm-project.org] p
Hi,
please update and rebuild to the latest ERT master to keep opm-parser building.
---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of
Hi,
I'm working on a better way of doing (Eclipse-compatible) output, and need to
grab some info from the simulators.
I have a WellState (and possibly Well* from opm-core) that I want to extract
rates at some perforation. It seems to me that the perfRates in WellState only
store the combined
Jeg begynner i Statoil nå mandag (11. januar), så jeg blir nok å høre fra.
From: Roland Kaufmann <roland.kaufm...@uni.no>
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 9:19 AM
To: Jørgen Kvalsvik
Subject: Re: [Opm] Thesis - Enhancing OPM-based Reservoir Simulati
First of all, I'm very sorry this took so long. There was an
administrative error at NTNU, so my thesis was not evaluated until now.
I call attention to my work and activity on the OPM mailing list and the
OPM Meeting in Trondheim in February. My report on the work has finally
been published,
On 03/16/2015 04:06 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
On 16/03/15 15:51, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
On 03/16/2015 02:49 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
On 26/01/15 13:00, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
In the periodic case, will some indices be encountered twice?
I'm not sure I understand the question. All indices
On 03/16/2015 02:49 PM, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
On 26/01/15 13:00, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Sorry about the delay. I was just going through my old e-mail and
noticed that I didn't see an answer to this question. I'll provide one
for the mailing list record, even it much time has
the spring.
Sincerely,
Jørgen Kvalsvik
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
On 2014-11-19 11:11, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
On 2014-11-19 17:41, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
On 2014-11-19 07:27, Alf Birger Rustad wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am guilty of creating yet another repository in opm. [...]
Honestly, I don't think it's that good an idea to have separate
repositories
On 2014-11-19 11:11, Bård Skaflestad wrote:
On 2014-11-19 17:41, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
On 2014-11-19 07:27, Alf Birger Rustad wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am guilty of creating yet another repository in opm. [...]
Honestly, I don't think it's that good an idea to have separate
repositories
14 matches
Mail list logo