Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs IFA00[56] gap analyzis

2017-01-10 Thread Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)
Hi, Thanks for the quick analyzis. The target of the current call for experts is only to identify the gaps. We are not looking to one-to-one match for each information element and each operation of IFA005 and 006 but looking for the same functionality provided by OpenStack. Br, Gerg0 From: joe

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [joid] ceilometer config bug

2017-01-10 Thread Ryota Mibu
Hi, Thanks for checking and letting me know the right person. I may reach out you again, once we got the upstream patch merged. BR, Ryota From: Narinder Gupta [mailto:narinder.gu...@canonical.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 3:24 PM To: Mibu Ryota(壬生 亮太) Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnf

[opnfv-tech-discuss] ACL error

2017-01-10 Thread Ehsan Tadayon
Hi all I am using distribution-karaf-0.5.2-Boron-SR2. When i add access list, enter parameters and save it, there is noting happened. I captured GET/PUT REST requests and it returned 404 error. How could i resolve that? The mentioned errors are as follows: PUT /restconf/config/ietf-access-con

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] VNF on boarding: Q&A Functest versus orchestrator projects

2017-01-10 Thread morgan.richomme
BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Romance Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T03 TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T0200

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel9.0][vlan] Fuel9.0 deployment failing with br-aux not found

2017-01-10 Thread Michael Polenchuk
Hi Veena, In case of DPDK enabled the br-aux bridge ain't created on compute nodes since physical(dpdk) interface is being connected directly to br-prv ovs bridge. I guess this case (ODL + OVS/DPDK) ain't supported yet. Please turn off "install dpdk" option and try it out. On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [multisite] Multisite VNF Geo site disaster recovery

2017-01-10 Thread Klemen Pogacnik
OK, I'll join you. On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 2:03 AM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, > > If you are interested in this topic, we can discuss it in the weekly > meeting, but I don't know whether the meeting time works for you or not. > > http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-meeting every Thursday,

[opnfv-tech-discuss] opnfvdocs project meeting

2017-01-10 Thread Sofia Wallin
BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:W. Europe Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T03 TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs?

2017-01-10 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Hi all Fuel team members, I'm looking for some guidance on how to track Fuel status for Danube and how to contact the Fuel team other than email, which we all have too much of. I see some info at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/fuel/Fuel+Opnfv but it seems that the irc channel referenced (opnfv-

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs?

2017-01-10 Thread Serg Melikyan
Hi Bryan, indeed IRC channel mentioned on our wiki page was wrong, I have updated wiki page - our actively used IRC channel is #opnfv-fuel. You can track our CI by the following link: http://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/fuel/ which has corresponding jobs for master which is Denube right now. On Tue,

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Weekly Technical Discussion #73

2017-01-10 Thread HU, BIN
BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Pacific Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0700 TZOFFSETTO:-0800 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02000

[opnfv-tech-discuss] FW: [Openstack-operators] [telecom-nfv] Meeting #16

2017-01-10 Thread Ulrich Kleber
FYI next IRC meeting of the Openstack Operators Telecom NFV group -Original Message- From: Curtis [mailto:serverasc...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 10 January, 2017 16:43 To: openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org Subject: [Openstack-operators] [telecom-nfv] Meeting #16 Hi All, We have ou

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs?

2017-01-10 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Thanks for the link. I do look at the Jenkins status for high-level info, but it’s hard to find out the things I need from that, which are, to start related to how a developer deploys a simple fuel-based scenario (e.g. os-nosdn-nonha) in the lab - What has changed since http://artifac

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [release] short release meeting next week (Jan 17)

2017-01-10 Thread David McBride
Team, I have a conflict at 9 a.m. (PST) next Tuesday, so I will be cutting the release meeting short by 15 minutes. David -- *David McBride* Release Manager, OPNFV Mobile: +1.805.276.8018 Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org Skype: davidjmcbride1 IRC: dmcbride ___

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][danube] proposed schedule slip for MS5 and MS6

2017-01-10 Thread David McBride
Team, In case you weren't on the call this morning, the TSC approved the proposed schedule slip. I will be updating the schedule on the Danube release page this week. Let me know if you have any questions. David On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:46 PM, David McBride wrote: > Reminder - discussion and

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [mano-wg] [MANO] Meeting #16 Recap 2015+ D-Release Priority including Scenario , Installers Features and Tetsing vIMS

2017-01-10 Thread Prakash Ramchandran
Please join us tomorrow for MANO WG setting D-Release Proirities for Integration with OPNFV VIM and test vIMS as priority. Agenda: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6827111 Meeting Times: Every Even Wednesday at 15.00 UTC (7.00 am PST) as per Project requests IRC#opnfv-m

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Community] Inputs to 2nd Multi-SDO-OpenSource Info Modeling Workshop uploaded

2017-01-10 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Hi all, The inputs to the 2nd Multi-SDO - Open Source Info Modeling Workshop have been uploaded to the OPNFV wiki at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/COM/Multi-SDO-Open+Source+Information+Modeling+Collaboration. In OPNFV we will be using that page and the linked pages for the action items to tra

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Infra Working Group Meeting

2017-01-10 Thread Morgan, Jack
BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Pacific Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0700 TZOFFSETTO:-0800 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02000

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting 1/13

2017-01-10 Thread Tianhongbo
BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:China Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:DAYLIGHT E

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar] Reminder of call this thursday 11AM US EST - also send me suggestions on when to do a F2F

2017-01-10 Thread Margaret Chiosi
Folks: Sounds like ONS may be the best time for us to do F2F vs Openstack in Atlanta next month. Let me know which conferences you will be attending to see if we can get a quorum at one of these: 1. Openstack Atlanta, Feb 2. Openstack Boston, May? 3. ONS Santa Clara, April 4. Layer 123 Santa Clara,

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Follow-up on the meetings wiki page discussion

2017-01-10 Thread Raymond Paik
All, Following up on our conversation from the TSC call... As discussed, we streamlined the project/working group meetings information on the wiki (https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings) so that you don't have to update the same meeting information both on the main meetings page and the daughte

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs IFA00[56] gap analyzis

2017-01-10 Thread joehuang
Ok. If IFA005/IFA006 is not defined as the API interface syntax, just for functionality description, I think the gap is not so huge. So only need to check for each interface defined in IFA005/IFA006 whether this interface's function could be supported by OpenStack. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang (jo

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs IFA00[56] gap analyzis

2017-01-10 Thread Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)
Hi, Exactly. We limit OpenStack to the projects with tc:approved-release tag and the functionality should be accessible via a NB API (not an API designed for communication between OpenStack components). Br, Gerg0 From: joehuang [mailto:joehu...@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 8:2

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Follow-up on the meetings wiki page discussion

2017-01-10 Thread Yujun Zhang
Done for QTIP. See https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/QTIP Please check if this is the expected result. [image: Screen Shot 2017-01-11 at 3.38.32 PM.png] × Yujun On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 2:02 PM Raymond Paik wrote: > All, > > Following up on our conversation from the TSC call... > > As di