[opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] Beijing design summit session recap - Doctor host maintenance

In this session [1] we discussed what has been tried to have in OpenStack the last year for planned host maintenance. Why changes were not done and what next to move this topic forwards. Shortly what was tried in the past year and why it did not realize: - There was discussions with OpenStack op

[opnfv-tech-discuss] TSC/Board and Board meeting summary

Here is a summary of the TSC/Board joint meeting and the Board meeting last Friday June 16, right after the Summit in Beijing. * LF Networking projects harmonization update: There was a discussion on proposed steps/structure for a new organization for networking projects in the LF. Discussion w

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [dovetail] TSC and DoveTail meeting to discuss scope and needs for CVP testing

Dave, all, > I would like to see us document some of the NFV related requirements > which are common across all RFCs from telcos, and which are available in all > viable VIM products. This is exactly the intention of the proposal, under the side constraint of drawing from already existing tests.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Survey of VSPERF Users and Contributors

Hi see answers below /Morgan On 19/06/2017 18:22, Cooper, Trevor wrote: I am collecting feedback about VSPERF from users and contributors … the main purpose is to help me motivate for our ongoing investment in the project. I already approached a few people … even if you have already given

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Survey of VSPERF Users and Contributors

Answers inline. Regards, Mark Mark Beierl SW System Sr Principal Engineer Dell EMC | Office of the CTO mobile +1 613 314 8106 mark.bei...@dell.com On Jun 19, 2017, at 12:22, Cooper, Trevor mailto:trevor.coo...@intel.com>> wrote: I am collecting feedback about VSPER

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Infra][Pharos][Releng][Octopus][Security] Infra Working Group Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:W. Europe Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T03 TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-marketing-committee] OPNFV Summit Day 2 Recap

Hi Joe, We are adding recordings to the OPNFV YouTube channel as they are being edited. Here is the link to the videos that are available so far. We will be adding the Chinese translation version next week once those are edited. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLiM029E-zvrtlTmH0h0mHt_-g8B-

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Update

Hi folks [barometer] Update Shout outs * Bryan, Aimee and Volodymyr for their work on the VES Demo. * D3: * CI jobs were green till 2 days ago - the fail seemed to be related to yardstick * Looks like there might be more delays due to environment instability * E Release * Next Milestone

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [barometer] Update

Thanks Maryam! Please see one update below, to help with your action item... From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Tahhan, Maryam Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 12:45 PM To: 'TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV' Cc: Power, Damien; Mcmahon,

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project

Hello, I'd like to poll the various groups about ideas for how to handle this scenario. I have interns working on breaking down services from StorPerf into different containers. In one case, it will be a simple docker compose that is used to fire up existing containers from the repos, but the

[opnfv-tech-discuss] functest in master (euphrates milestone 3.1)

Hi Ray, David, It looks like SNAPS/Functest is now fixed. I see our master healthcheck passed here: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/35999/ Thanks Steve, Jose and Cedric for fixing this during the busy summit week. Tim Rozet Red Hat SDN Team ___ o

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Multiple docker containers from one project

Hi Mark, It is perfectly fine to have different build processes and/or number of artifacts for the projects from releng point of view. Once you decide what to do for storperf, we can take a look and adapt docker build job/script to build storperf images, create additional repos on docker hub t

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] functest in master (euphrates milestone 3.1)

Awesome, thanks for the update! On 6/20/17, 11:54 AM, "Tim Rozet" wrote: Hi Ray, David, It looks like SNAPS/Functest is now fixed. I see our master healthcheck passed here: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/35999/ Thanks Steve, Jose and Cedric for fixing this during the

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Apex deployment fails

Hi Thomas, Is that the output from 'openstack stack failures list overcloud --long' ? Return code 6 means it is probably a puppet issue. If you source stackrc, nova list, ssh heat-admin@ and check /var/log/messages. Search for 'puppet apply' and look for the failure if the first command listed

[opnfv-tech-discuss] TSC vote requested for security fix

OPNFV TSC Members: Sorry for the short notice, but earlier today the Linux Foundation IT team has been made aware of a high priority security issue (see https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/stackguard) and need to apply package errata and perform systems reboot as soon as possible.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [APEX] Apex virtual deployment install fails with error

Hi Srikanth, The failure you see is caused by a syntax error in ovs-dpdk-preconfig.yaml that we use to configure ovs-dpdk. I submitted a patch to fix this: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/36277/ You could either wait for this fix to be merged or apply and build this patch yourself. Thanks Fe

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [dovetail] TSC and DoveTail meeting to discuss scope and needs for CVP testing

Hi Tim, On 06/20/2017 09:02 PM, Tim Irnich wrote: >> I would like to see us document some of the NFV related requirements >> which are common across all RFCs from telcos, and which are available in all >> viable VIM products. > > This is exactly the intention of the proposal, under the side cons

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] TSC vote requested for security fix

+1 to fixing security issues. I have no preference on times. Thanks, Dave. On 06/21/2017 07:07 AM, Raymond Paik wrote: > OPNFV TSC Members: > > Sorry for the short notice, but earlier today the Linux Foundation IT > team has been made aware of a high priority security issue > (see https://access

[opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [opnfv-tsc] TSC vote requested for security fix

+1, security is very important. hongbo -邮件原件- 发件人: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] 代表 Dave Neary 发送时间: 2017年6月21日 11:03 收件人: Raymond Paik; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org 抄送: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 主题: Re: [opnfv-tech-d

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [qtip][storperf] minimum development environment for running storperf

Hi, Mark Following up the project breakout session[1] on summit, we have kicked off the integration of storperf testing for storage QPI. The first question we have is the minimum requirements for running storperf for *development* purpose. From my understanding, it seems to be a regular openstack

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] TSC vote requested for security fix

- +1. - Either. Bin From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 3:08 PM To: opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [opnfv-tech-dis

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] TSC vote requested for security fix

+1 - Either Stuart -914 886 2534 From: on behalf of Raymond Paik Date: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 3:07 PM To: "opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org" Cc: "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] TSC vote requested for security fix OPNFV TSC Members: Sorry for the short notice,

[opnfv-tech-discuss] New meeting time for the TSC call

All, As discussed on the TSC call today, I'd like to propose changing the TSC meeting time to 6am Pacific Time. This would make it slightly easier for community members in Asia to join the weekly call. Obviously, an earlier start will make things a little painful for people in Pacific Timezone (

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [vsperf] Survey of VSPERF Users and Contributors

Comments inline Note: some of these comments might already be outdated Regards, *Christo Kleu* On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Cooper, Trevor wrote: > I am collecting feedback about VSPERF from users and contributors … the > main purpose is to help me motivate for our ongoing investment in the

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] New meeting time for the TSC call

+1 for canceling the meeting on July 4th ☺ From: opnfv-tsc-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tsc-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:03 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org Subject: [opnfv-tsc] New meeting time for

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] TSC vote requested for security fix

+1 no preference Morgan On 21/06/2017 06:54, Stuart Mackie wrote: +1 - Either Stuart -914 886 2534 *From: * on behalf of Raymond Paik *Date: *Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 3:07 PM *To: *"opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org" *Cc: *"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" *Subject: *[opnfv-tech-discuss]

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] TSC vote requested for security fix

+1 No preference. /Fatih On 21 Jun 2017, at 08:28, wrote: +1 no preference Morgan > On 21/06/2017 06:54, Stuart Mackie wrote: > +1 - Either > > Stuart > -914 886 2534 > > From: on behalf of Raymond Paik > > Date: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 3:07 PM > To: "opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org" >

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Apex deployment fails

Hello Tim, this was the printed output during deployment (nohup.out). Initially I thought it was related with resources and focused on undercloud RAM availability. The ODL restarts during next steps explains it... Thanks a lot BRs/ Thomas On 20/06/17 22:09, Tim Rozet wrote: Hi Thomas, Is tha