BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+
TZOFFSETTO:+
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+
TZOFFSETTO:+
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20181127T153000Z
DTEND:20181127T163000Z
DTSTAMP:20181127T071745Z
ORGANIZER;CN=trinaths@gmail.com:mailto:trinaths@gmail.com
Hello Edge Cloud Team,
We are going to have our first edge cloud meeting after the OpenStack summit
this Wednesday, Nov. 28, at 13:00 UTC.
Look forward to see you then.
Best,
Qihui
China Mobile Research Institute
(+86) 13810659120
From: qihuiz
Date: 2018-11-21 20:22
To: fuqiao; beth.cohen;
Hi Bin,
Perhaps 'integrated' is a better word here than 'supported'. A lot of
the work in OPNFV involves integrating many of these upstream components
which in turn exposes bugs, or creates features that enable an NFV use
case.
I'm quite terrible with examples, but I'm sure others from the
Team,
Due to the need to have an extended TSC meeting, our release meeting on Nov
27 will start 30 minutes later than usual (7:30 PST) and will be reduced to
30 minutes.
David
Title: OPNFV Release meeting
David McBride is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
Join from PC, Mac,
Trevor,
Thank you for your question.
Can you give more details and examples of "doing what we're best at, which is
getting NFV supported by upstream projects."?
Thank you
Bin
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Bramwell
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 4:17 PM
To: HU, BIN
Cc: Tim Irnich
Hi Bin,
I'm still unclear on the first point: "Enabling and automating
stakeholders’ business transformation into DevOps organization"
From what I've read it seems like the suggestion is to package up
everything that makes up OPNFV (Platform, CI/CD piplines, testing /
verification /
On 11/26/18 4:40 PM, HU, BIN wrote:
>
> If I understand correctly, Point #1 and #3 are actually the same question,
> i.e. what will we do in the next step?
No, I'm rather suggesting to make sure our understanding is complete
before we proceed. We clearly do not yet sufficiently understand what
Hi Bin,
In slide 3, you have this: –Addressing key roadblock of other open source
communities (e.g. ONAP, OpenStack, Acumos etc.)
It would be good if you can add K8S too as an example. Like this: –Addressing
key roadblock of other open source communities (e.g. ONAP, OpenStack, Acumos,
K8S etc.)
Srini,
Thank you for input.
The details of K8S and how it should work with NFV need to be addressed at a
more tactical level, because K8S is one of the technologies in CN paradigm. E.g:
- Step 2+: when defining how a CN-based platform is composed of, how packaged
CN-based testing tool is
Manuel,
Thank you for your great question. I would say that slide #13 provides the
strategy and vision at a high level, and slide #16 provides more clarity of
steps to execute towards the strategy and vision. The others are background and
supporting material. I think our discussion is more
Hi Bin,
Reading all your answers (thanks for that!), I think I was confused
because your slides contain much more content that what you really want
us to approve, right? If I understand correctly, basically tomorrow you
would like the TSC to *only* vote on your proposed "strategy (vision
and
Hi Bin,
My 2 cents from strategy perspective.
I see that Cloud native and micro services mentioned in your presentation. But
I did not see any Kubernetes term used anywhere. Hence, I thought I would bring
this up.
So far, majority of the OPNFV focus seems to be supporting openstack based
Hi all,
I'll be 10-15 minutes late today. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Regards,
Trevor Bramwell
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#22431):
-Original Message-
From: Tim Irnich
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 8:37 AM
To: HU, BIN ; AshYoung ; Georg Kunz
; Manuel Buil
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-...@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tsc] Discussion of OPNFV Strategic Plan
Hi all,
having read the entire
Hi all,
having read the entire thread again this morning, I'd like to offer the
following thoughts to hopefully help us make progress:
- We need to make sure the decision we take triggers action and change
(since I think we all agree that we need to change something in OPNFV).
To achieve this,
16 matches
Mail list logo
