Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-15: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
> Thank you for addressing Paul’s and Roman’s comments. I will wait for
> Roman to confirm whether the changes you have made, mostly deleting the
> paragraphs that he put a DISCUSS on, whether he is ok with removing his
> DISCUSS on the document.
Hi Michael,
Thank you for addressing Paul’s and Roman’s comments. I will wait for Roman to
confirm whether the changes you have made, mostly deleting the paragraphs that
he put a DISCUSS on, whether he is ok with removing his DISCUSS on the document.
At the same time, looking at the number of
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-16.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG
of the IETF.
Title: Extended TCP Options and IPv6 Extension Headers IPFIX Information
Elements
Authors: Mohamed Boucadair
On Jun 24, 2024, at 8:38 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke)
wrote:
>
> Grrr, forgot the link for convenience. Please provide WG LC reviews for the
> following draft:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13/
I have general concerns about the document, which I've raised
Grrr, forgot the link for convenience. Please provide WG LC reviews for the
following draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13/
Thanks.
Joe
From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Date: Monday, June 24, 2024 at 08:36
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: u...@ietf.org
Subject:
We’re up to WG LC on this draft. We want to reconfirm any known IPR related to
this work:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13/
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this
With shepherd in hand (thanks, Med), we are kicking off a two-week working
group last call for the TACACS+ secured with TLS 1.3 draft. This draft has
received several reviews, and the authors have addressed all outstanding
comments. That said, I have re-requested reviews from SEC DIR and OPS
Hi Tero,
Thanks for the review.
We can update Section 6.1 with another example. Please see
