WG LC has closed on this document. There have been a few comments by
both opsawg members and others (after the extended sweep of RTG). The
authors have not yet addressed the comments in a published draft but
have proposed changes.
Adrian Farrel has graciously agreed to act as shepherd of this
Hi Julian,
Thank you for the comments.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : OPSAWG De la part de Julian Lucek
> Envoyé : jeudi 30 septembre 2021 17:00
> À : opsawg@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: L2NM document: draft-ietf-opsawg-l2n
A couple of comments:
1/ "evpn-type" seems redundant, as the allowed types are already covered by
"vpn-type". But if there is a reason to have it, also need "mpls-evpn" as an
allowed evpn-type.
2/ There is a container called "status" (imported from vpn-common). "Status" is
a yang keyword, so
/IETF-OPSAWG-WG/lxnm/tree/master/I-D-L2NM, fwiw.
Comments are still more than welcome.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : OPSAWG De la part de Joe Clarke (jclarke)
> Envoyé : jeudi 16 septembre 2021 17:59
> À : opsawg@ietf.org
> Objet : [OPSAWG] WG LC: L2NM docum
?
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : OPSAWG De la part de Joe Clarke (jclarke)
> Envoyé : jeudi 16 septembre 2021 17:59
> À : opsawg@ietf.org
> Objet : [OPSAWG] WG LC: L2NM document: draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm
>
> Hello, WG. We would like to kick off a WG LC for
From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Sent: 17 September 2021 18:17
On 9/17/21 04:34, tom petch wrote:
> From: OPSAWG on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke)
>
> Sent: 16 September 2021 16:59
>
> Hello, WG. We would like to kick off a WG LC for the
> draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm draft. As you review it, I would
On 9/17/21 04:34, tom petch wrote:
> From: OPSAWG on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke)
>
> Sent: 16 September 2021 16:59
>
> Hello, WG. We would like to kick off a WG LC for the
> draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm draft. As you review it, I would encourage
> looking back at draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common to
From: OPSAWG on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Sent: 16 September 2021 16:59
Hello, WG. We would like to kick off a WG LC for the
draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm draft. As you review it, I would encourage
looking back at draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common to make sure everything
lines up well. We'd like
Hello, WG. We would like to kick off a WG LC for the
draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm draft. As you review it, I would encourage
looking back at draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common to make sure everything
lines up well. We'd like to give two weeks for review, with LC closing
on October 1.
@Adrian Farrel you
