-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It didn't seem to work. Which server(s) do you use? Maybe that has
something to do with it.
Thanks so far!
Frivolous lawsuits. Unlawful government seizures. It's a scary world
out there!
Protect your privacy, keep what you earn, and even earn more in
Hello,
I would like to know what is the meaning of the fourth figure (in this
example, the one after 5 and 4) in the data displayed by the Tor Network
Status at serifos.eecs.harvard.edu ?
FR *clearstream 20541
Thanks in advance.
Pascal Levasseur
Andrew Del Vecchio wrote:
> Dear fellow "Torizens",
> I use the Enigmail Thunderbird extension (enigmail.mozdev.org) for
> my GPG encryption needs. I've followed the directions on
> http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorifyHOWTO#head-33bccb11670a9c8e0e4c08fa6f0b94716627bdb0,
> but h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear fellow "Torizens",
I use the Enigmail Thunderbird extension (enigmail.mozdev.org) for
my GPG encryption needs. I've followed the directions on
http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorifyHOWTO#head-33bccb11670a9c8e0e4c08fa6f0b94716627
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Very true. Add to this the use of secure apps. This means no Skype,
which codes your local IP into headers, etc.
~Andrew
Frivolous lawsuits. Unlawful government seizures. It's a scary world
out there!
Protect your privacy, keep what you earn, and eve
Peter Palfrader wrote:
> For some reason you don't have a 127.0.0.1. Make sure you didn't remove
> the loopback device from your networking config.
I have solved the problem making a new networking configuration by the
installer of FreeBSD. Now it works (fine) for the web whereas not for
the mai
For content retrieval: Freenet/Gnunet.
For anonymous services: I2P(possibly)
For anonymous Internet: Tor
For anonymous email: Onion Routers
Each piece of software fills a niche in this hierarchy. Tor is the most
important as it lets people use existing applications anonymously. Sure,
Tor will have
Total Privacy wrote:
> Thank you very much, that will do the trick I think, but still; have to
> get an email accout somewhere to put into it, to serv.
> Then to use my standard ISP supplied account would spoil the idea with
> anonymity and Tor usage, so the second trick will be to find an very
Thank you very much, that will do the trick I think, but still; have to
get an email accout somewhere to put into it, to serv.
Then to use my standard ISP supplied account would spoil the idea with
anonymity and Tor usage, so the second trick will be to find an very
best to use free account for
"Taka Khumbartha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is the issue here not with gmail, but perhaps javascript? can anyone
> confirm that there is no in-secure re-direction if javascript is
> dis-abled? if there still is (in-secure re-direction), please be
> specific about how to observe such an in-secu
Hi *Exile In Paradise* :
>> [2 lignes citées masquées]
>
> It makes no sense to me at all to use TOR to access
> a service nominated (and shortlisted) over and over
> for Privacy International's "Big Brother" Awards:
>
> http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd[347]=x-347-182940&
On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 11:11 -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:35:04AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > i2p is not realy new.-) The Version History started in 2003.
>
> Personally, my position on I2P is that I hav
Hi *Arrakistor* :
> Personally it sounds good to me as long as you use SSL. As long as you
> never exposed yourself to the email or contaminated the information in
> the email, it looks good. Torbird is available in a alpha form right
> now, which includes Tor + Thunderbird + OpenPGP + Enigma
Tim McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> top posted (please don't):
> Jason Holt wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Tim McCormack wrote:
> >
> >> The problem is that Google puts the auth tokens in an http:// GET
> >> request -- you can see for yourself. And then it switches to
> >> https://. The exit
Anothony Georgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Firefox/1.5.0.7 honours an unencrypted redirect
> > as response for a https connection request.
> > You don't get a warning, but of course if you look
> > for it, you can see that the connection is
> >
Claude LaFrenière <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi *Fabian Keil* :
>
> > Just in case you wondered whether Tor and Gmail are a good
> > combination: They are not.
>
> Just one remark Sir.
>
> This site is accessible by anybody in clear :
> http://serifos.eecs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/exit.pl?texto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> >> > Just in case you wondered whether Tor and Gmail are a good
> >> > combination: They are not.
> >> I'm not quite sure what you are saying?
> >>
> >> Are you saying that some info gets leaked if you use
> >> unencrypted http to transfer mai
> > Just in case you wondered whether Tor and Gmail are a good
> > combination: They are not.
It makes no sense to me at all to use TOR to access
a service nominated (and shortlisted) over and over
for Privacy International's "Big Brother" Awards:
http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml
Personally it sounds good to me as long as you use SSL. As long as you
never exposed yourself to the email or contaminated the information in
the email, it looks good. Torbird is available in a alpha form right
now, which includes Tor + Thunderbird + OpenPGP + Enigmail.
download: http://www.free
Hi *Fabian Keil* :
> Just in case you wondered whether Tor and Gmail are a good
> combination: They are not.
Just one remark Sir.
This site is accessible by anybody in clear :
http://serifos.eecs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/exit.pl?textonly=1
which reveal these informations:
DE *zwiebelkuchen
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:11:29AM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:35:04AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > i2p is not realy new.-) The Version History started in 2003.
>
> Personally, my position on I2P is tha
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:35:04AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> i2p is not realy new.-) The Version History started in 2003.
Personally, my position on I2P is that I have no idea how secure its
design is, since I haven't seen a protocol spe
Original message
>Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:43:12 -0500
>From: Edward Langenback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re[2]: [INFO] new anonymizing software
>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
>> i2p is not realy new.-) The Version History started in 2003.
>
>> I have some expirience with it, but i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 19, 2006 at 4:35:04 AM
in Message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, bagelcat wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> i2p is not realy new.-) The Version History started in 2003.
> I have some expirience with it, but i thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
i2p is not realy new.-) The Version History started in 2003.
I have some expirience with it, but i think its offtopic here. Or
not? well just a fes comments..
- - it a java-app running on java 1.5
- - like to get a lot of cpu time+ram
- - like to
I just read this article on a new software that
try to harden the Tor protocol.
The related paper sound interesting
Any maillist member has comments or maybe some experience to share?
http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=06/09/12/1828258
http://www.cs.duke.edu/~jadrian/Hooks and Miles - Onion R
26 matches
Mail list logo
