I've been told the same thing, but the reasoning was that they couldn't guarantee what
was put out for download was actually the correct build. Not sure that's very
reassuring, either.
Jim
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 12:34 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORA
--- Markus Reger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > out of
curiosity : did you ever check the filesizes
> in bytes of yr first corrupt downloads with the
> bytes of the files on the download site?
I did. They bear some resemblace, but figures are not
exactly the same.
I also compared sizes of files I
Oracle Corp. finds the checksum concept to be alien. They actually
posted these words to me in a tar at metalink, "We don't support
servers that are installed via download from otn." I guess "network
computing" really is dead. ;)
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 07:54:27AM -0800, Boris Dali wrote:
>
out of curiosity : did you ever check the filesizes in bytes of yr first corrupt
downloads with the bytes of the files on the download site? i'm running O9i too, now
wondering if this test might suffice to tell whether the download was successful or
not. i didn't experience any probs so far unti
Ray, right on target!
After looking for disk errors in dmesg output,
/var/log/messages to no avail, I finally uninstalled
the whole 9.2 OH last night,
re-downloaded/re-burned/re-... and this time
installation of both 9.2.0.1 and a patch went with no
glitches.
Apparently Disk2 was corrupted/missi
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:50:52PM -0800, Boris Dali wrote:
> I guess disk explanation is the most logical one to
> assume, but I've no idea how to confirm and overcome
> it. As I mentioned I re-installed it in different
> combinations multiple times. Would this file always go
> the same place on d
Thanks for reply, Ray.
I guess disk explanation is the most logical one to
assume, but I've no idea how to confirm and overcome
it. As I mentioned I re-installed it in different
combinations multiple times. Would this file always go
the same place on disk (say same bad sector)?
One interesting th
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:53:37AM -0800, Boris Dali wrote:
>
> Hope not everybody is off to OOW :(
>
> Did anybody get the above combo working? I know that
I have installed Oracle 9.2.0.1 on Mandrake 9 twice
on marginal machines without any such behavior. Could
you have gotten an i/o error o
Hope not everybody is off to OOW :(
Did anybody get the above combo working? I know that
Oracle is not certified on Mandrake and I don't
care... as long as I can make it work that is
Here are the facts:
1) HW: One way 2.4 GH box with 1GB DDR RAM, plenty of
disk space
2) SW/OS: Mandrake 9 / 2.4.1
