RE: orion-list 1QSb and 1QSa (and Daniel)

2001-10-13 Thread David C. Hindley
Russel, >>I don't think the author of Daniel had an accurate grasp of the chronology between the fall of Jerusalem and his own time, so I don't think we can be too precise on the early end of this period<< For various reasons, I suspect that the apparent confusion of chronology in Daniel, and ag

Re: orion-list 1QSb and 1QSa (and Daniel)

2001-10-13 Thread RGmyrken
Dear David, First, I see I made a typo: it should be J. Collins (not Collons) the author of _The Scepter and the Star_ (1995). Secondly, I grasp your take on Dan. 9, which is interesting, but I (and others, not that that matters) would see the 7 weeks, 62 weeks, and final week in st

RE: orion-list 1QSb and 1QSa (and Daniel)

2001-10-13 Thread David C. Hindley
Russell Gmirkin commented: >>J. Collons, _The Scepter and the Star_ (1995) has a chapter devoted to the Messiahs of Aaron and Israel (p. 74ff) that is fairly exhaustive in its use of secondary literature and basically considers the title to refer to eschatological high priestly and royal figures.

RE: orion-list 1QSb and 1QSa (and Daniel)

2001-10-13 Thread David C. Hindley
Russell, My apologies. "you are still looking at the sequence 7, 62, 1 as sequential" should be "you are still looking at the numbers 7, 62, 1 as chronologically sequential" Respectfully, Dave Hindley Cleveland, Ohio, USA For private reply, e-mail to "David C. Hindley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---

Re: orion-list 1QSb and 1QSa (and Daniel)

2001-10-13 Thread RGmyrken
David, 1QS 9:11 refers to the time when "there shall come the Prophet and the Messiahs of Aaron and Israel." The Messiah figure or figures we are discussing are thus distinguished from the coming Prophet. J. Collons, _The Scepter and the Star_ (1995) has a chapter devoted to the Messiahs

RE: orion-list 1QSb and 1QSa

2001-10-13 Thread David C. Hindley
Russell Gmirkin responded: >>On the first question, one might point to the Oniads as figures holding both high priestly and civil positions. The reference to "Messiah the Prince" (or "the Anointed Prince") at Dan. 9:25 is usually taken to refer to Onias III, assassinated in exile in 170 BCE. Doe

Re: orion-list 1QSb and 1QSa

2001-10-12 Thread RGmyrken
Herb Basser and David Hindley both propose interesting and original ways to understand a "Messiah of Aaron and Israel". David asks: > How many examples can we find in this general period of individuals > who hold several titles (and thus rule several domains) > simultaneously, and how

Re: orion-list 1QSb and 1QSa

2001-10-12 Thread Herbert Basser
The term law of Moses and Israel is used in wedding ceremonies to this day and Hanna Cotton discussed a similar term known from ketubot and talmuds-- the dual term Moses and Israel was understood in medieval times to mean "under the conditions approved by Rabbinic authority" likewise I assume

RE: orion-list 1QSb and 1QSa

2001-10-12 Thread David C. Hindley
Russell Gmirkin said: >>To my mind, a title "Messiah of Aaron and Israel" -- referring to a single individual -- makes no sense. It just seems unintelligible and self-contradicting, on a common sense level. Where, in the HB or the Qumran corpus (excluding the phrase in question) is Aaron synony

Re: orion-list 1QSb and 1QSa

2001-10-12 Thread RGmyrken
Dear Greg Doudna, To my mind, a title "Messiah of Aaron and Israel" -- referring to a single individual -- makes no sense. It just seems unintelligible and self-contradicting, on a common sense level. Where, in the HB or the Qumran corpus (excluding the phrase in question) is Aaron synon

Re: orion-list 1QSb and 1QSa

2001-10-11 Thread Greg Doudna
Russ Gmirkin writes: > On Greg's comments on 1QSa, I think > there's a pretty good case to be made that both priestly and lay messiahs are > referred to, as conventionally interpreted. Most superficially, other Serekh > texts distinguish the Messiahs of Aaron and Israel. Well, maybe they do and

Re: orion-list 1QSb and 1QSa

2001-10-11 Thread Barbara Leger
So let me ask this: what would be the proper definition of a Messiah or messiah in this context? Thanks, Barb Leger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I agree with Ian and Greg that there is no real basis for interpreting > 1QSb as addressed to the high priest. On Greg's comments on 1QSa, I think

Re: orion-list 1QSb and 1QSa

2001-10-11 Thread Barbara Leger
Forgive my ignorance, but who or what is the Maskil? Thanks, Barb Greg Doudna wrote: > Ian's question on 1QSb is insightful, and agrees with some > study I have done on this point. I think the alleged > 'high priest' as the addressee of 1QSb 1.19-3.19 (Milik) > and (though with some dispute as

Re: orion-list 1QSb and 1QSa

2001-10-11 Thread RGmyrken
I agree with Ian and Greg that there is no real basis for interpreting 1QSb as addressed to the high priest. On Greg's comments on 1QSa, I think there's a pretty good case to be made that both priestly and lay messiahs are referred to, as conventionally interpreted. Most superficially, ot