Invoking session Bean second time gives me error

Hi, I am getting the following error when I am invoking my session bean second time. First time it works perfectly and second time it gives the following error. How can I solve this error. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks Ritesh. My Code: private IntialContex getInitialContext

Re: Library placement

It sounds like Struts (like many projects from jakarta) has broken classloading. You can print out the current classloader in Orion from any class to see what paths are included. These consist of: paths specified in orion-application.xml via jar/zip files in orion/lib jar/zip files in mywebapp/W

Library placement

What is the correct placement of supporting libraries for an application within Orion? We are running into continual class loader issues no matter where we place them. We have tried: - The approved J2EE blueprints location which is WEB-INF/lib. This works fine in Tomcat, however, I get a

Re: orion xml's

On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Morten Wilken wrote: > Am i the only one who thinks that the idea that you have to edit the > autogenerated files like orion-ejb-jar.xml etc. is a bit problematic? Probably. > sure it can be done and it works, but i would be much happier if i could > have 2 sets of xml fil

Re: Presentation & Business tier JSP-Servlet Deployment

At 11.52 19/10/2001, Prashant Gaikwad wrote: >Now requirment says that the presentation JSP's will be deployed on Apcahe >web server and servlets-java beans holding bisuness workflow logic to be >deployed on J2EE container i.e OC4J or Orion. Why this requirement? Be very careful not to mistake Ap

Re: SV: MDB in orion 1.5.2 using Queue

Magnus, I created my own resource provider for Tibco JMS and it would work, but only for the Queue/Topic returned by getDefaultResource() (can't remember the exact method name off the top of my head). Anyway, my orion-ejb-jar.xml would like like: My queue would be located at java:comp/resourc

Transaction behaviour

Hi all, We have implemented a session facade architecture, with session beans calling multiple entity beans. We have configured the as "Required" for everything, as normal. What is the exact criteria for a session method to rollback? Is it that it must be a system initiated exception, or else t

Re: SV: MDB in orion 1.5.2 using Queue

Magnus, When could we expect the durable subscription-type tag to work? Currently it does not work. I have used resource-provider to connect my MDB to an external JMS server and I noticed that if I set the subscription-type to durable then when I use my declared connectionfactories in re

RE: JavaMail problem

Hi, Thanks for the replies. Still no joy, this is strange behaviour. We don't want to enable relaying totally, because of the security risks. Yet its still a problem if we enable it for specific IP addresses, it doesn't work. We can enable routing to specific external domains, and this works. An

RE: MDB in orion 1.5.2 using Queue

On Fri, 2001-10-19 at 02:38, Romen Law wrote: > > I did find two things though: > 1. someone posted before saying that in Orion you should not make MDB > implement MessageListener, otherwise it will not work. I found that to be > false. Cool. Sorry for the false info. I was referring to this prev

Presentation & Business tier JSP-Servlet Deployment

Hello friends I'm developing a system which contains JSP's that hold presentation code and business code is governed by servlets-java bean combination. The web server is Oracle HTTP server(uses apache) which is part of Oracle 9iAS. Now requirment says that the presentation JSP's will

SV: MDB in orion 1.5.2 using Queue

Hi. 1) In 1.5.3 Orion will tell you if you havent implemented MessageDrivenBean and MessageListener in your MDB. 2) Orion will use the default JMS resource if you dont specify a destination-location etc in orion-ejb-jar.xml. ResourceProviders, made public in 1.5.2, lets you use 3rd party resour

RE: Nimda Virus

Title: RE: Nimda Virus er no ... you meet on IRC get the other guys IP and then you ...   Justin -Original Message-From: Nusairat, Joseph F. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 18 October 2001 04:02To: Orion-InterestSubject: RE: Nimda Virus Wow i didnt believe rudeness