On Sat, 8 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While it is true that all services running on UNIX and requiring a bind on
ports below 1024 must start as root, it isn't accurate to say that all of
them run as root. All of the servers that we run on our production servers
provide us with a way to
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Dale Bronk wrote:
I have an application that uses Apache, JRun, and standard JDBC calls (no
EJB) all in the same vm (no distributed objects). It has it's own smtp
mailer, connection manager/pooler, etc. Am I going to have problems porting
this to Orion since I see that
On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Raymond Offiah wrote:
Hi, I've just installed Netscape 6, and now I can't start Orion.
It seems that it checks the registry for Version 1.2 of the Java RunTime,
but Netscape 6 upgrades it to 1.3.
Is there any way around this, since I have other stuff that needs
On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
Has anyone successfully installed Orion on Linux? I've got it installed and
running as root.
I've also create an orion user group to run the server, but when I start
the server as the user 'orion' it won't allow me to start the httpd daemon -
On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Robert Krüger wrote:
At 15:41 08.04.00 , Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
Has anyone successfully installed Orion on Linux? I've got it installed and
running as root.
you mean on a port below 1024? that's not possible AFAIK unless you use a
native library for the SUID stuff
On 26 Mar 2000, Jay Jayaprasad wrote:
I would like to execute a finder for a CMP EJB that uses a selection criteria
based on a table other than the table in which the entity exists. This does
not seem to be possible in Orion today as it requires adding another table in
the from clause of the
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Barry Fujii wrote:
Has anyone tried using the ejb samples that came with orion on a solaris 7
box?
# java -version
java version "1.2.2"
Solaris VM (build Solaris_JDK_1.2.2_05, native threads, sunwjit)
i added the following to my server.xml file:
application
Orion 0.9.1n (and propably a few versions before that) has major problems
with Sybase. The problem seems to be in the connection pooling mechanism.
For some reason it tries to use database connections that has been closed.
I get the following error message when deploying a bean whose tables
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Magnus Rydin wrote:
But if your system does not need this (now or in the future), Databasesystems
like MySQL is excellent.
Under what cicumstances is mysql better than one of the four? Or even
PostgreSQL?
_like_ MySQL :)
That is small, cheap, and fast on
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000, Magnus Rydin wrote:
Foreign keys are good for making sure your data is consistant, for example you
cant reference a bank account that does not exist.
They are also good for defining delete rules, such as if this order is deleted,
make sure all orderrows are deleted too.
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Kucera, Rich wrote:
Isn't container-managed transactions the point of EJBs anyway? So database
transaction
facilities are no longer mission critical? Or am I missing something...
Yes, No. Container-managed transactions are a big point of using EJB's.
But what transaction
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Kucera, Rich wrote:
Where's the beef in EJB anyway? I thought we had a transactional layer in
middleware with ejb...
datasources wouldn't necessarily need to be transactional themselves (they
wouldn't need to be
full-blown databases).
You can't do it. In the end there
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Brien Voorhees wrote:
From: "Frank Apap" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am currently using hSql for my db with my ejb operations, but I want to
switch over to a more reliable and documented db. Does anyone have any
recommendations for simply but reliable database that will be
13 matches
Mail list logo
