-Interest
Sent: 3/30/01 2:52 PM
Subject: JBoss verses Orion
I ported our Orion application to JBoss. I love JBoss for
usability, documentation and support. Unfortunately our application is
very
performance dependent the JBoss version ran very slow. After playing
with
cache setting, etc
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: JBoss verses Orion
Yes, the amount of charitable contributions made by the Orion team is of the
highest importance to me, too. And whether they supported Bush or Gore in
Florida. And whether their favorite color is blue - if it's not, then I HATE
ORION
mailing list, and Rickard and Marc are actively answering
questions in the Jboss mailing list, both on a regular basic.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 5:40 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: JBoss verses Orion
Yes
: Saturday, March 31, 2001 10:45 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JBoss verses Orion
I do like playing with the jboss/jetty combination (www.jboss.org)over the
jboss/tomcat combination, even though I started with the tomcat combination.
I agree that the Orion JSP engine is faster
in the Jboss
mailing list, both on a regular basic.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 5:40 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: JBoss verses Orion
Yes, the amount of charitable contributions made by the Orion team
10:02 AM
Subject: Re: JBoss verses Orion
(And we all know Karl wrote most of Orion at any
rate, he and Elin.)
Thanks for the history lesson. Magnus and Karl have done one superb job for two
people.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Sick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 10:20 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: JBoss verses Orion
When I was first introduced to Orion, Magnus
01 6:28 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: JBoss verses Orion
Magnus and Karl both chip in now and then, they used to do that more in
the past I guess, but (understandably) realised that it's a far better use
of their time to ensure they have a stellar product, than to respond to
endless complaints.
To: Orion-Interest
Sent: 3/30/01 2:52 PM
Subject: JBoss verses Orion
I ported our Orion application to JBoss. I love JBoss for
usability, documentation and support. Unfortunately our application is
very
performance dependent the JBoss version ran very slow. After playing
with
cache setting, etc
-user] JBoss verses Orion
I'm not completely sure if this is the reason but there is this "one
VM/classloader or multiple VMs/classloaders" distinction. I believe the
important point is that Orion is an EJB *and* Servlet container whereas
JBoss is only an EJB container. So if you
I ported our Orion application to JBoss. I love JBoss for
usability, documentation and support. Unfortunately our application is very
performance dependent the JBoss version ran very slow. After playing with
cache setting, etc. It seemed like the communications was the main bottle
neck.
To test
What version of JBoss? If 2.1 (beta) the latest binary or a build from
source? If source, what date? Earlier this year there were some
performance problems stomped, but I haven't done any testing for
performance.
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Fink, Paul wrote:
I ported our Orion application to
Sent: 3/30/01 3:21 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss verses Orion
What version of JBoss? If 2.1 (beta) the latest binary or a build from
source? If source, what date? Earlier this year there were some
performance problems stomped, but I haven't done any testing for
performance.
On Fri, 30 Mar
Oh sorry I should have said.
Jboss 2.1 binary (down loaded March 22)
Orion is 1.3.8
-Original Message-
From: Dan Christopherson
To: 'jBoss'
Cc: 'Orion-Interest'
Sent: 3/30/01 3:21 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss verses Orion
What version of JBoss? If 2.1 (beta) the latest binary
14 matches
Mail list logo
