er 28, 2000 10:42 PM
Subject: JMS implementation, is it for real?
Is Orion's JMS implementation for real? While it supports the
simplistic behavior as demonstrated by the chat and coffeemaker demo it
doesn't appear to support much else.
JMS parts I can't get working:
o Transac
ay, October 28, 2000 10:42 PM
Subject: JMS implementation, is it for real?
Is Orion's JMS implementation for real? While it supports the
simplistic behavior as demonstrated by the chat and coffeemaker demo it
doesn't appear to support much else.
JMS parts I can't get working:
o Tr
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Rimmer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Orion-Interest" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 10:42 PM
Subject: JMS implementation, is it for real?
Is Orion's JMS implementation for real? While it supports the
ot; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2000 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: JMS implementation, is it for real?
Hi Jason,
We are using FioranoMQ and it seems to be working well. see:
http://www.fiorano.com/
OrionTeam - If your JMS implementation is good - do speak up. I've read
s
PROTECTED]
To: "Orion-Interest" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2000 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: JMS implementation, is it for real?
Just a follow up. I noticed that Fiorano is making a JMS test suite
available in case anyone wants to get it and run it against Orion. If you
Is Orion's JMS implementation for real? While it supports the
simplistic behavior as demonstrated by the chat and coffeemaker demo it
doesn't appear to support much else.
JMS parts I can't get working:
o Transactions. Doesn't seem to matter what you call: commit, rollback,
etc
