EJBs can be less work to use, but
more work to build, and then you
discover they don't scale and have
to rewrite the underpinnings.
Jaz
Keith Kwiatek wrote:
Hello,
EJB's are great if you like tripling the amount of code you have to
write
How is everyone building their web
al Message-
From: Keith Kwiatek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 11:48 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: There has GOTTA be a BETTER way
Does anyone know if jdeveloper (which is based on Jbuilder)
has the same
functionality
When editing XML files, its not immediately apparent if there is a
problem
I know one thing that help solve that problem. If Sun would publish an
XMLSchema (instead of a DTD) then xml editors (like xml spy) can be used to
create the xml files and catch the mistakes as you make them.
Dave Ford
EJB's are great if you like tripling the amount of code you have to
write
Depends on what you are comparing it to--CMP reduces a lot of db code.
How is everyone building their web apps with hand coded programs, or
using automagic tools?
We're hand coding.
It sure seems like
If you take a look at all the code that Orion (and any other EJB server
product) "writes" for you when you deploy your beans, and all the code that
exists in the server to manage those beans, you'd see that the way EJBs work
REDUCE the amount of code you have to write.
EJBs are an immature
JBuilder 4 Enterprise allows you do build Entity CMP beans this way. You
can connect to a datasource and then select tables and keys for your beans.
It's wild. I'm still getting used to it.
Can anybody else with more experience using this tool give us a little
insight?
Thanks,
Cory
At
Am I off base here, or are ejb's a lot more work? How can people talk about
how EJB's "speed development time"?!?
alot more work than what ?
I to solve a problem using EJB's you should have a problem that EJB's were
designed to solve. And so if you have one of those problems. Then EJB
Keith Kwiatek wrote:
Hello,
EJB's are great if you like tripling the amount of code you have to
write
How is everyone building their web apps with hand coded programs, or
using automagic tools?
Mostly by hand.
It sure seems like there should be some sort of tool that
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Keith Kwiatek wrote:
How is everyone building their web apps with hand coded programs, or
using automagic tools?
I use JBuilder Enterprise 4 which does do skeletal work, including
matching up home remote interfaces to the businessmethods of
beans, and it produces
:35 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re: There has GOTTA be a BETTER way
EJB's are great if you like tripling the amount of code you have to
write
Depends on what you are comparing it to--CMP reduces a lot of db code.
How is everyone building their web apps with hand coded
Keith Kwiatek wrote:
Hello,
EJB's are great if you like tripling the amount of code you have to
write
How is everyone building their web apps with hand coded programs, or
using automagic tools?
It sure seems like there should be some sort of tool that you can just point
at
Does anyone know if jdeveloper (which is based on Jbuilder) has the same
functionality?
Keith
- Original Message -
From: Cory Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: There has GOTTA be a BETTER way
Sent by: cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
owner-orion-interest@orionSubject: Re: There has GOTTA
be a BETTER way
be a BETTER way
Does anyone know if jdeveloper (which is based on Jbuilder)
has the same
functionality?
Keith
- Original Message -
From: Cory Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: There has GOTTA
Pramati Stuido does that...
takes a DB Table (if you want one), and creates either BMP or CMP entities
It has a packager, and it also has a J2EE App Server + Web Server built in,
for development purposes, and allows for debugging of jsp/servlets EJBs
It also is 100% pure java, so you can run
15 matches
Mail list logo
