Re: Bi-directional relations (my kludge)

2001-04-06 Thread Ray Harrison
To: "Orion-Interest" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 6:47 PM Subject: Re: Bi-directional relations (my kludge) Hi Reid - What App Servers currently offer m-n relationships - I'm interested in exploring how some of them operate. Cheers Ray --- Reid Hartenbo

RE: Bi-directional relations (my kludge)

2001-04-06 Thread Jeff Schnitzer
Cc: Subject: Re: Bi-directional relations (my kludge) Hi Reid - What App Servers currently offer m-n relationships - I'm interested in exploring how some of them operate. Cheers Ray --- Reid

Re: Bi-directional relations (my kludge)

2001-04-05 Thread Reid Hartenbower
I have found the lack of bi-directional support very frustrating, and think that it so impedes CMP functionality that it should be qualified as a bug, and not a pending feature. I also don't see what the big technical challenge in implementing it would be. If Orion is going to be this sluggish

Re: Bi-directional relations (my kludge)

2001-04-05 Thread Ray Harrison
Hi Reid - What App Servers currently offer m-n relationships - I'm interested in exploring how some of them operate. Cheers Ray --- Reid Hartenbower [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have found the lack of bi-directional support very frustrating, and think that it so impedes CMP functionality that

Re: Bi-directional relations (my kludge)

2001-04-05 Thread Hani Suleiman
This might come as a bit of a surprise...but bi-directional relationships are a feature of EJB2.0, which is not final, and in fact if the rumours are to be believed, will undergo major changes in the next draft. I find it astounding that someone thinks that incomplete partial support for a moving