RE: Stress orion => servlet engine failed arround 200 users

: Re: Stress orion => servlet engine failed arround 200 users Christian Sell wrote: > $14900 is a nice pricetag, indeed - depending from whose side you look at > it. I dont see the similarities with orion, however (and sure am glad) Loadtesting tools do come with a hefty pricetag, agreed.

Re: Stress orion => servlet engine failed arround 200 users

"Joseph B. Ottinger" wrote: > It's always nice to see these! What URL? http://www.ideit.com /Marcus -- Marcus Ahnve email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lecando AB Office: +46-(0)8-634 94 18 Sweden Mobile: +46-(0)70-462 19 18

Re: Stress orion => servlet engine failed arround 200 users

Christian Sell wrote: > $14900 is a nice pricetag, indeed - depending from whose side you look at > it. I dont see the similarities with orion, however (and sure am glad) Loadtesting tools do come with a hefty pricetag, agreed. Compared to products like LoadRunner I continue to see it as a reason

RE: Stress orion => servlet engine failed arround 200 users

--Original Message- > From: Chris Bartling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 6:35 PM > To: Orion-Interest > Subject: RE: Stress orion => servlet engine failed arround 200 users > > > Anyone willing to write up a little summary of what the

RE: Stress orion => servlet engine failed arround 200 users

PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joseph B. Ottinger Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 4:26 AM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: Stress orion => servlet engine failed arround 200 users On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Marcus Ahnve wrote: > > While I'm at it I might as well recommend PureLoad from InnovativeI

Re: Stress orion => servlet engine failed arround 200 users

> > While I'm at it I might as well recommend PureLoad from InnovativeIT. > Excellent tool with a nice pricetag - much like Orion. > $14900 is a nice pricetag, indeed - depending from whose side you look at it. I dont see the similarities with orion, however (and sure am glad) regards

Re: Stress orion => servlet engine failed arround 200 users

On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Marcus Ahnve wrote: > > While I'm at it I might as well recommend PureLoad from InnovativeIT. > Excellent tool with a nice pricetag - much like Orion. > It's always nice to see these! What URL? (I've been looking into a better tool than httpbench myself, and I'm writing so

Re: Stress orion => servlet engine failed arround 200 users

We've performed quite a few loadtests with logins, insertion into databases etcetera. The server used for testing has two PII 550 and 768 MB of RAM. As long as there are enough connections to the database (see previous posts about that) we can see very stable performance from Orion. We've had 40 t

RE: Stress orion => servlet engine failed arround 200 users

8:54 AM > To: Orion-Interest > Subject: Stress orion => servlet engine failed arround 200 users > > > > > hello, > > we do stress tests using webLoad (http://www.radview.com) on > our full j2ee > application with orionserver on a full NT 100Mbits

Stress orion => servlet engine failed arround 200 users

hello, we do stress tests using webLoad (http://www.radview.com) on our full j2ee application with orionserver on a full NT 100Mbits nerwork. our current configuration is: - Web Server:orion1.3.8+jdk1.3(or jrockit) on a PIII 700MHz - 512 Mo RAM and all ejb call are remote call to f