, some players have been less than colloborative, power
alliances within the group are more clearly defined and there is heightened
mistrust. Has anyone used open space in similar circumstances and do you have
advice other than "trust the process"?
Regards,
Bert Elliott
Program Administr
ople are there because they want to
> be rather because they feel they have to be I'd appreciate your
> thoughts and experiences. Joe Szostak
--
Bert Elliott
Program Administrator
Staff Development and Training, Ministry of Health
848 Pandora Avenue, Victoria, B.C. V8W 1P2
Phone:
I don't think one can hold the space and fill the space at the same time. In my
mind, the choice is to facilitate or join the group providing ideas. One cannot
fufil both roles at the same time and the facilitator role is too important to
the entire process to abandon. If one's passion for the c
I have enjoyed reading about the liberating and empowering effect this
law has on fellow facilitators. In Open Spaces sessions, however, I
have noticed that people are reluctant to apply it at first. Traditional
meeting etiquette prevails and it looks like some people should
butterfly or bumblebee
I have just experienced 45 minute sessions and I would not recommend it. Last
week I
ran Open Space as a demonstration for our office group. We had two discussion
sessions, one of 45 minutes and one of 30 minutes. In some of the groups, there
was
not enough time to clarify and discuss the issue a
Here goes:
Ascending beyond constricted diatribes
Enlightening fear-gripped henchmen
Igniting jaded knotted leaders
Mountaineering new open precipices
Quietly restoring space to
Understand, value, wish
X-citing your zuchini
Well- my dictionary had a really small "Z" section and all the good ones
