Re: Naming matters

2002-04-25 Thread Alan Stewart
Hi All A consulting company in Adelaide has recently invited me to join them as an associate. This arises through their coming to appreciate that OST provides a way forward in the kind of projects in which they are - and hope to be - engaged. Two queries: . What does one call oneself in such

Re: Naming matters

2002-04-24 Thread Ralph Copleman
On 4/24/02 11:02 PM, "Alan Stewart" wrote: > A consulting company in Adelaide has recently invited me to join them as > an associate. This arises through their coming to appreciate that OST provides > a way forward in the kind of projects in which they are - and hope to be - > engaged. > > Two

Re: Naming matters

2002-04-25 Thread BrendanMcKeague
Alan this is a bit similar to where I am at present, geographically also - not far away in Perth, WA I have been invited into association with a consulting/training group - and wish to be identified as an 'Open Spacer' - they currently list me as a Facilitator and Consultant which speaks to them

Re: Naming matters

2002-04-25 Thread WB-TrainConsult
Straße 88b/18, AT-1060 Wien, AUSTRIA fone & fax: +431 596 86 57 - Inscricao no grupo de discussao "Sistemas organizacionais": Escrever um email para o endereco On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 21:56:18 +, Ralph Copleman wrote: " Re: Naming matters On 4/24/02 11:02 PM, "Alan Stewa

Re: Naming matters

2002-04-25 Thread Meg Salter
MegaSpace Consulting 416/486-6660 meg.sal...@sympatico.ca www.megaspaceconsulting.com - Original Message - From: "WB-TrainConsult" To: Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 6:48 AM Subject: Re: Naming matters > Alan, Ralph, > > My association to peace-maker is COLT > &g

Re: Naming matters

2002-04-25 Thread Jeff Aitken
I use the term "collaboration" all the time -- but I do not use the term "collaborator" (California spelling?) to describe the people involved. Rather, I talk about "collaboration among" participants, members, staff, etc. Meg, I have also described my role as "consultant/facilitator" for a few yea

Re: Naming matters

2002-04-25 Thread florian fischer
Jeff Aitken schrieb: > .. described my role... yes description is important. description is much better than a fixed term, much better than a brand. description needs to describe within the context relating to the process which is involved and intended. some weeks ago I decided to desig

Re: Naming matters

2002-04-26 Thread Joelle Lyons Everett
Alan-- Like Ralph, I call myself a consultant, and let others ask me what kind of consulting I do--in my case, quite a bit of facilitation, some training, and often coaching as well. This leads to good conversations, and saves me from having to have new cards printed when I branch off in some new

Re: Naming matters

2002-04-26 Thread Alan Stewart
Hi All Ralph poses an interesting dilemma. Whether or not to indicate in what we call ourselves the nature of our services. Florian expresses the case for the latter with usual flair! To date I have gone along with this (although I have little evidence of its effectiveness). Whi

Re: Naming matters

2002-04-26 Thread Michael M Pannwitz
Dear Alan, when you look at my signature below, its just my name. My website, same thing. I have no business card nor letterhead. Sometimes I put "boscop" into the letterhead (boscop = berlin open space cooperative). Sometimes, especially asked if I am a consultant, I say that I am a consultant fo

Re: Naming matters

2002-05-03 Thread Fr Brian S Bainbridge
Dear Jeff Mike Bell talks of being an "animateur" - which I think is brilliant. Cheers and blessings, BRIAN. Jeff Aitken wrote: > I use the term "collaboration" all the time -- but I do not use the term > "collaborator" (California spelling?) to describe the people involved. > Rather, I talk abo