Re: [ovs-discuss] ovsdb: schema conversion for clustered db blocks preventing processing of raft election and inactivity probes

2023-03-27 Thread Frode Nordahl via discuss
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 9:50 PM Ilya Maximets wrote: > > On 1/23/23 11:44, Frode Nordahl wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 3:07 PM Ilya Maximets wrote: > >> > >> On 12/14/22 08:28, Frode Nordahl via discuss wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> When performing an online schema conversion for a clustere

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS and OVN compatibility matrix

2023-03-27 Thread Jake Yip via discuss
On 27/3/2023 10:19 pm, Ilya Maximets wrote: On 3/27/23 05:34, Jake Yip via discuss wrote: Hi all, Just following up this comment from Ilya in a separate thread from a discussion previously [1] I see that Ubuntu 22.10 is providing OVS 3.0 + OVN 22.09, which is a decent combination performan

Re: [ovs-discuss] ovsdb: schema conversion for clustered db blocks preventing processing of raft election and inactivity probes

2023-03-27 Thread Ilya Maximets via discuss
On 1/23/23 11:44, Frode Nordahl wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 3:07 PM Ilya Maximets wrote: >> >> On 12/14/22 08:28, Frode Nordahl via discuss wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> When performing an online schema conversion for a clustered DB the >>> `ovsdb-client` connects to the current leader of the clus

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS and OVN compatibility matrix

2023-03-27 Thread Ilya Maximets via discuss
On 3/27/23 05:34, Jake Yip via discuss wrote: > Hi all, > > Just following up this comment from Ilya in a separate thread from a > discussion previously [1] > >> I see that Ubuntu 22.10 is providing OVS 3.0 + OVN 22.09, which is >> a decent combination performance-wise.  But yeah, I'm not sure i

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS and OVN compatibility matrix

2023-03-27 Thread Frode Nordahl via discuss
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 5:34 AM Jake Yip via discuss wrote: > > Hi all, > > Just following up this comment from Ilya in a separate thread from a > discussion previously [1] > > > I see that Ubuntu 22.10 is providing OVS 3.0 + OVN 22.09, which is > > a decent combination performance-wise. But ye