Hi,
I have DPDK 16.11.1 and OVS 2.6.1, with 1 Gb Huge page/ and 2 NICs bound
with Igb_uio drivers.
I run in to trouble while creating DPDK ports on the OVS bridge.
*ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface dpdk-p1 type=dpdk*
works perfectly fine.
But,
*ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p0 -
Greetings,
My computer is setup using Ubuntu 18.04 with OVS 2.90 and dpdk 17.11.2-1.
I'm attempting to create a few virtual ports (type dkdkvhostuserclient) on
my OVS bridge (datapath_type=netdev) and assign an IP addresses to them.
ovs-vsctl add-br ovdkibr1 -- set bridge ovdkibr1 datapath_type=
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:36:23AM +0100, Advith Nagappa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have DPDK 16.11.1 and OVS 2.6.1, with 1 Gb Huge page/ and 2 NICs bound
> with Igb_uio drivers.
>
> I run in to trouble while creating DPDK ports on the OVS bridge.
>
>
> *ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface
It did not tell me anything:
*Mar 20 11:42:23 ovs-vsctl: ovs|1|vsctl|INFO|Called as ovs-vsctl
add-port br0 dpdk-p0 -- set Interface dpdk-p0 type=dpdk
options:dpdk-devargs=:00:0a.0*
*Mar 20 11:42:23 ovs-vswitchd[23906]: ovs|00042|bridge|WARN|could not open
network device dpdk-p0 (No such
From: Darrell Ball
Date: Monday, March 20, 2017 at 10:12 PM
To: Advith Nagappa , Ben Pfaff
Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org"
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK
From: on behalf of Advith Nagappa
Date: Monday, March 20, 2017 at 8:19 PM
To: Ben Pfaff
Cc: "disc...@openvswitc
d to your response.
Best Regards
Advith
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Darrell Ball
> *Date: *Monday, March 20, 2017 at 10:12 PM
> *To: *Advith Nagappa , Ben Pfaff
> *Cc: *"disc...@openvswitch.org"
> *Subject: *Re
scuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Advith Nagappa
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 8:12 AM
To: Darrell Ball
Cc: disc...@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK
I don’t see the pci memory mapping logs here.
Can you also attach the full dpdk logs ?
I have attached the dpdk-log
.7.0.
>
>
>
> If you can give these suggestions a shot it will help narrow down the
> issue at hand.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Ian
>
>
>
> *From:* ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-discuss-bounces@op
> envswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *A
g/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2016-March/040190.html
We could document this in OVS DPDK as it is function impacting.
From: Advith Nagappa
Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 2:46 PM
To: "Stokes, Ian"
Cc: Darrell Ball , "disc...@openvswitch.org"
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK
mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2016-March/040190.html
We could document this in OVS DPDK as it is function impacting.
*From: *Advith Nagappa
*Date: *Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 2:46 PM
*To: *"Stokes, Ian"
*Cc: *Darrell Ball , "disc...@openvswitch.org"
*Subject: *Re: [o
il/ovs-discuss/2016-March/040190.html
>
>
>
> We could document this in OVS DPDK as it is function impacting.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Advith Nagappa
> *Date: *Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 2:46 PM
> *To: *"Stokes, Ian"
> *Cc: *Darrell Ball , "
a previous thread that answers this question:
>
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2016-March/040190.html
>
>
>
> We could document this in OVS DPDK as it is function impacting.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Advith Nagappa
>
> *Date: *Tuesd
h.org" <mailto:disc...@openvswitch.org>
<mailto:disc...@openvswitch.org>
*Subject: *Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK
Hi Ian,
Yes, I am using OVS-2.6.1 release.
And yes, you are correct.
/ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface dpdk-p1
type=dpdk/, infac
, how does the dpdk port know which interface should it bind to
>> when its not specified.. “
>>
>>
>>
>> Here is a previous thread that answers this question:
>>
>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2016-March/040190.html
>>
>>
>>
>&g
Hi all
I have a question about a performance in a specific use case, and any
suggestions how to improve it. Use case:
Host runs Fedora 23, with kernel 4.4, ovs 2.7.2 and dpdk 16.11. There are
few interfaces: first one does not support DPDK, all others support it.
Tested topology:
port 1 ---> ovs
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 05:18:08PM -0400, Pedro Serrano wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> My computer is setup using Ubuntu 18.04 with OVS 2.90 and dpdk 17.11.2-1.
> I'm attempting to create a few virtual ports (type dkdkvhostuserclient) on
> my OVS bridge (datapath_type=netdev) and assign an IP addresses
Flavio,
Thanks. That's what I suspected. I guess if too many packets that are
meant to be managed by DPDK get exposed to the kernel space via a TAP
interface then the speed gains would be lost.
I've also found that solutions to manage Layer 3 for DPDK devices are not
part of OVS. Either OVN o
Folks,
I have configured ovs-dpdk to replace sriov deployment for bonding
support. everything good but somehow as soon as i start hitting
200kpps rate i start seeing packet drop.
I have configured CPU isolation as per documentation to assign a
dedicated pmd thread. I have assigned 8 dedicated PMD
We use ovs2.17.2 and dpdk 22.0. After configuring SNAT，we encountered coredump
problems.
Please take the trouble to look at these problems，thank you！
#0 0x7f249b6ad03b in __GI_raise (sig=0, sig@entry=6) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:46
#1 0x7f249b68c859 in __GI_abort () at a
We use ovs2.17.2 and dpdk 22.03. After configuring SNAT，we encountered
coredump problems.
Please take the trouble to look at these problems，thank you！
#0 0x7f249b6ad03b in __GI_raise (sig=0, sig@entry=6) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:46
#1 0x7f249b68c859 in __GI_abort () at
Hello all,
I've started to look at the OVS-DPDK vxlan tunneling feature as well as the
different examples in openvswitch.org.
I have a few questions/notes on which I would be glad to have your opinion and
thoughts.
1. When configuring port as type vxlan the remote_ip option is a must.
It ca
How is the future support planned for OVS+DPDK+Conntrack?
Is it like this:
UserMode: OVS+DPDK
Kernel Mode: Conntrack
--
with regards,
Purnendu Ghosh
___
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discu
We are playing with OVS/DPDK and have noticed that STT does not seem to be
supported in userspace. Wondering if anyone happens to be working on
implementing this or has any suggestions for making it work
Testing on OVS 2.7.9 and DPDK 16.11
thanks
Luca.
__
Are we using DPDK Bond-PMD library for OVS bonding feature ? Or is it
completely implemented in OVS itself ?
Regards,
Vishal
___
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
Dear All,
I'm using ovs-dpdk with lacp bond_mode=balance-tcp.
VT-x enabled via intel_iommu=on iommu=pt.
Sometime, when ovs-dpdk start, it raised exception like below.
I have tried remove 'intel_iommu=on iommu=pt', it returned success.
We are ussing 'Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller X710
On 30/10/2021 06:07, Satish Patel wrote:
Folks,
I have configured ovs-dpdk to replace sriov deployment for bonding
support. everything good but somehow as soon as i start hitting
200kpps rate i start seeing packet drop.
I have configured CPU isolation as per documentation to assign a
dedicated
Thank you for reply kevin,
I do have a multi queue configuration, as you can see following. Let
me tell you what tools I am using for traffic generation. We run VoIP
services (pretty much telco style) so we need low latency for the
network to provide quality audio experience for customers. We
deve
Hello,
I have very excited to explore OVS DPDK and want to know the following:
1. Can I install OVS-DPDK for Baremetal with mellanox NIC.
2. If yes, is there any specific documentation I can follow to proceed
with this configuration?
3. Do you have any slack channel or any other forum for discuss
Hi,
Any update with this issue? This issue happens with OVS 3.0.1 and DPDK
21.11.3 too.
Best regards,
> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 15:45:37 +0800 (CST)
> From: ?? <13813836...@163.com>
> To: b...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk crash
> Message-ID: <
Hi,
Any update with this issue?
This issue happens with OVS 3.0.4 and DPDK 21.11.2 too.
Best regards
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailma
Hi,What is the current state about the ovs-dpdk TSO offload feature? Is this planned any time soon?___
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
Hi,
I have a performance issue on vxlan tunnelling at dpdk built ovs platform.
Bridge and port structure and other system informations of both sides are
shown below.
Our scenario is iperf load test between VM's, which are connected to br-int
switches at both sides. Firstly I have route the tr
Hi all,
I've been trying to extend an existing OVS installation on CentOS 7 to
support DPDK, but could not find a way without a clean install. Is it
possible to configure OVS with DPDK without reinstalling it? [1]
# ovs-vsctl --no-wait set Open_vSwitch . other_config:dpdk-init=true
# ovs-vsctl ge
On 17 November 2016 at 19:44, Purnendu wrote:
> How is the future support planned for OVS+DPDK+Conntrack?
> Is it like this:
> UserMode: OVS+DPDK
> Kernel Mode: Conntrack
OVS v2.6 already introduced initial support for connection tracking in
userspace for DPDK:
https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/
Hello.
Meta.
OVS ver: 2.7.90, today master (stp tests skipped)
Compiler: GCC 5.3.1, default flags
DPDK: 16.11.1 (from Ubuntu Cloud Archive: Ocata)
Env: Ubuntu 16.04.1 up-to-date.
Kernel: 4.8.0-41-generic
Problem.
When I adds a vhost-interface into bridge OVS specifies incorrect rights
for the s
Hello,
If one is setting up a OVS Switch with DPDK on a Intel Server with Intel
NICs on Ubuntu 16.10, they could just use the UIO drivers right? Do they
don't need VFIO configuration [1] correct? Assume that they Intel Server
here is mainly acting as a hardware soft-switch is not running any
vir
Regards
_Sugesh
From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org
[mailto:ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Vishal Deep Ajmera
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 8:01 AM
To: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk bond mode
Are we using DPDK Bond-PMD library for OVS
Hi guys,
Seems OVS-DPDK still missing IP fragmentation support, is there any
schedule to have it? I'm transferring to use OVN, but for those nodes
which have external network connection, they may face this problem, except
to configure Jumbo frames, is there any other workaround?
BR.
Hui.
_
Hi Everyone,
I would greatly appreciate any input.
The setting that i am working with is a host with ovs-dpdk connected to a
VM.
What i see when i do performance test is that after about a minute or two
suddenly i have many drops as if the cache was full and was dumped
improperly.
I tried to pla
Hi,
I switched from OVS to OVS-DPDK and changed the VNFs to use vhost-user
backend. I used iperf to compare the performance of vhost-net and
vhost-user backend performance. Despite tuning on all fronts [more queues,
more pmd threads chaining affinities, socket memory, increase cpus] get
the below
March 2021 16:57
To: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: [ovs-discuss] Ovs-dpdk bonding error
Dear All,
I'm using ovs-dpdk with lacp bond_mode=balance-tcp.
VT-x enabled via intel_iommu=on iommu=pt.
Sometime, when ovs-dpdk start, it raised exception like below.
I have tried remove 'inte
DPDK
> 19.11.2 and saw no error
>
> when I created bond port listed below.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Emma Finn
>
>
>
> *From:* discuss *On Behalf Of *KhacThuan
> Bk
> *Sent:* Tuesday 9 March 2021 16:57
> *To:* ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
> *Subject:* [ovs-disc
Sorry to interrupt you ,
When testing ovs-dpdk-meter (ovs-2.11.0 / dpdk-18.11.0 /
kernel-lt-5.4.119-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64) ,I met some issues;
if meter added to flow, the virtual machine will receive packets according
to the setting rate (by pktps) only just at the starting moment, then d
Folks,
I have deployed ovs-dpdk using legacy neutron-openvswitch-agent. My
openstack version is wallaby and the OVS version follows. My issue is
I have multiple VMs running on this compute node and interestingly if
I run tcpdump on vm-A then I can see traffic of vm-B which is hosted
on the same hy
Hello Folks,
I have a host with a DPDK physical interface attached to br0 and access to this
host is through an IP address on the bridge interface.
On enabling userspace_tso with the intention of bringing up VM's with
vhost_user.
Strangely I noticed that after ssh to this host from an external ho
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 10:06 AM Rahul Shah via discuss
wrote:
>
> I am testing the OVS-DPDK with KNI port type but have been getting the ‘Not
> supported’ error. I checked my OVS iface_types and KNI is not listed in the
> port type.
>
> I am using the latest OVS and DPDK 21.11. The DPDK is built
Hi, ALL
A assert panic was trigger when I run ovs-dpdk tests.
one vm is nginx server, another vm run wrk.
I guss the reason is key of default conn and rev_key of natted conn are same,
hash caculated from default conn and natted conn are same too,
and the two conns insert into the same list, th
On 9/12/2018 7:02 AM, multi_task wrote:
Hi,
What is the current state about the ovs-dpdk TSO offload feature? Is
this planned any time soon?
There is ongoing work to enable TSO for OVS with DPDK.
There are patches available that are under review currently but have not
been upstreamed to m
Hello,
I have a compute node installed with OVS+DPDK, and I am running a WRL Guest
VM which also has DPDK app running inside it.
This Guest VM has two interfaces - 1 VirtIO (mgmt) + 1 SRIOV (used by DPDK
app). I am observing that as soon as my DPDK app starts, my mgmt interfaces
goes down.
Any i
Hello,
I want to use Open vSwitch with DPDK enabled. For this purpose, I first
allocate 512 HugePages of size 2MB to have a total of 1GB of HugePage memory
available for OVS-DPDK. (I don’t set any value for dpdk-socket-mem so the
default value of 1GB is taken). Then I set dpdk-init=true. This n
-discuss] OVS+DPDK on CentOS 7
Hi all,
I've been trying to extend an existing OVS installation on CentOS 7 to support
DPDK, but could not find a way without a clean install. Is it possible to
configure OVS with DPDK without reinstalling it? [1]
# ovs-vsctl --no-wait set Open_vS
t; *From:* ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org <
> ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org> on behalf of Nicolas Vazquez <
> nicovazque...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 10, 2019 4:30 PM
> *To:* ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
> *Subject:* [ovs-discuss] OVS+DPDK on CentO
I dont think is dpdk enabled package...
you need to get the ovs from the openstack repo...
From: Nicolas Vazquez
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 5:05 PM
To: Alon Dotan
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS+DPDK on CentOS 7
Version is 2.9.2
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:30:12AM -0300, Nicolas Vazquez wrote:
> I've been trying to extend an existing OVS installation on CentOS 7 to
> support DPDK, but could not find a way without a clean install. Is it
> possible to configure OVS with DPDK without reinstalling it? [1]
>
> # ovs-vsctl --no-
Thank you both.
I tried replacing the OVS packages. Have bind NIC to DPDK support:
# dpdk-devbind --status
Network devices using DPDK-compatible driver
:02:04.0 '82545EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) 100f'
drv=igb_uio unused=
However whenev
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 04:16:14PM -0300, Nicolas Vazquez wrote:
> Thank you both.
>
> I tried replacing the OVS packages. Have bind NIC to DPDK support:
> # dpdk-devbind --status
>
> Network devices using DPDK-compatible driver
>
> :02:04.0 '82545
My mistake :)
Been checking the /var/run/openvswitch/ovs-vswitchd.log and found this is
the error:
2019-07-11T03:11:31.789Z|00226|netdev_dpdk|INFO|Socket
/var/run/openvswitch/test created for vhost-user port test
2019-07-11T03:11:31.790Z|00227|dpif_netlink|WARN|system@ovs-system: cannot
create po
It looks like dpdkvhostuser ports are deprecated, although they should
still work.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 12:35:53AM -0300, Nicolas Vazquez wrote:
> My mistake :)
>
> Been checking the /var/run/openvswitch/ovs-vswitchd.log and found this is
> the error:
>
> 2019-07-11T03:11:31.789Z|00226|netdev
I forgot to finish my thought.
For the most recent version of OVS, if DPDK is supported, so is
dpdkvhostuser (and dpdkvhostuserclient, which is not deprecated). Maybe
dpdkvhostuser was optional in 2.9.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 01:22:20PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> It looks like dpdkvhostuser ports
Thanks Ben and Alon for your help.
I want to share the solution in case someone else hits the same issue:
dpdkvhostuser type requires the bridge to be created with
datatype_path=netdev as stated in the documentation:
http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/dpdk/
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
El j
Hello,
I am using OVS DPDK 2.9.2 with TRex traffic generator to simply forward the
received traffic back to the traffic generator (i.e. ingress0->egeress0,
egress0->ingress0) over 2 port 10G NIC.
The OVS throughput with this setup matches the traffic generator (all packets
sent by TG are receive
Hello,
I am using OVS DPDK 2.9.2 with TRex traffic generator to simply forward the
received traffic back to the traffic generator (i.e. ingress0->egeress0,
egress0->ingress0) over 2 port 10G NIC.
The OVS throughput with this setup matches the traffic generator (all
packets sent by TG are received
From: on behalf of Aynur Shakirov
Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 6:17 AM
To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS+DPDK: socket permissions' problem
Hello.
Meta.
OVS ver: 2.7.90, today master (stp tests skipped)
Compiler: GCC 5.3.1, default flags
DPDK
37 AM, Darrell Ball wrote:
*From: * on behalf of Aynur
Shakirov
*Date: *Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 6:17 AM
*To: *"ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
*Subject: *[ovs-discuss] OVS+DPDK: socket permissions' problem
Hello.
Meta.
OVS ver: 2.7.90, today master (stp tests skipped)
Compiler: GCC
2017 03:37 AM, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> From: on behalf of Aynur Shakirov
>
> Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 6:17 AM
> To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
> Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS+DPDK: socket permissions' problem
>
>
>
&
Regards
_Sugesh
From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org
[mailto:ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Shivaram Mysore
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 10:54 AM
To: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS DPDK and VFIO/UIO
Hello,
If one is setting up a OVS Switch
vswitch.org [mailto:ovs-discuss-bounces@
> openvswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *Shivaram Mysore
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 23, 2017 10:54 AM
> *To:* ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
> *Subject:* [ovs-discuss] OVS DPDK and VFIO/UIO
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> If one is setting up a OVS
Regards
_Sugesh
From: Shivaram Mysore [mailto:shivaram.mys...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:56 PM
To: Chandran, Sugesh
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS DPDK and VFIO/UIO
Thanks Sugesh.
Is VFIO required only when we have a virtualized
; *Cc:* ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
> *Subject:* Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS DPDK and VFIO/UIO
>
>
>
> Thanks Sugesh.
>
>
>
> Is VFIO required only when we have a virtualized infrastructure?
>
> *[Sugesh] Do you mean running OVS-DPDK inside VM/Connecting VMs to the
>
@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS DPDK and VFIO/UIO
Nope. I meant OVS as the switching fabric for a virtualized infrastructure -
need VFIO
If using OVS as a hardware switch (server with NICS where clients are connected
to raw ethernet ports for switching), then UIO is the way to go
ide.gitlab.io/dpdk-guide/setup/binding.html
>
>
>
>
>
> *Regards*
>
> *_Sugesh*
>
>
>
> *From:* Shivaram Mysore [mailto:shivaram.mys...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 23, 2017 1:04 PM
>
> *To:* Chandran, Sugesh
> *Cc:* ovs-discuss@op
ons, however.
Maybe we can resurrect these efforts, but with client mode available, I
don't see a huge reason to do so.
On 03/22/2017 03:37 AM, Darrell Ball wrote:
From: on behalf of Aynur Shakirov
Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 6:17 AM
To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch
Hi,
I used dpdk-17.2 and ovs-2.7 to rpm a package follows the instructions on
:http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/intro/install/fedora/
first,I have RPM the dpdk package, and rpm i dpdk.rpm and insmod the igb_uio.ko,
then, I start to RPM the ovs-2.7, with next cmd:
# ./boot.sh
#./configure
Hi all.
I am setting up a network node for the OpenStack cluster (mitaka) in the
classic scenario with OpenvSwitch (
https://docs.openstack.org/liberty/networking-guide/scenario-classic-ovs.html#openstack-services-network-node).
On the network node a neutron is launched. The neutron controls the
O
Hi All,
I have ovs 2.6.1 with dpdk-stable-16.07.2 , I'm trying to create an af_packet
vdev interface with the following commands:
1.ip tuntap add dev tap1 mode tap
2.ovs-vsctl add-port br0 tap1 -- set Interface tap1 type=dpdk \
options:dpdk-devargs=eth_af_packet0,iface=t
From: on behalf of Hui Xiang
Date: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 7:47 PM
To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require
Hi guys,
Seems OVS-DPDK still missing IP fragmentation support, is there any schedule
to have it?
OVS 2.9
I'
Thanks Darrell, comment inline.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of Hui Xiang <
> xiangh...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 7:47 PM
> *To: *"ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
> *Subjec
From: Hui Xiang
Date: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 9:43 PM
To: Darrell Ball
Cc: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require
Thanks Darrell, comment inline.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Darrell Ball
mailto:db...@vmware.com>&g
well.
[image: Inline image 1]
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Hui Xiang
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 9:43 PM
> *To: *Darrell Ball
> *Cc: *"ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
> *Subject: *Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DP
From: Hui Xiang
Date: Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 3:18 AM
To: Darrell Ball
Cc: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require
Blow is the diagram (using OVS-DPDK):
1. For packets coming to vm1 from internet where could have MTU 1500, th
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Hui Xiang
> *Date: *Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 3:18 AM
> *To: *Darrell Ball
> *Cc: *"ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
> *Subject: *Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require
>
From: Hui Xiang
Date: Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 6:59 PM
To: Darrell Ball
Cc: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Darrell Ball
mailto:db...@vmware.com>> wrote:
From: Hui Xia
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Hui Xiang
> *Date: *Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 6:59 PM
> *To: *Darrell Ball
> *Cc: *"ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
> *Subject: *Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require
>
From: Hui Xiang
Date: Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 8:10 PM
To: Darrell Ball
Cc: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Darrell Ball
mailto:db...@vmware.com>> wrote:
From: Hui Xia
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Darrell Ball wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Hui Xiang
> *Date: *Thursday, July 27, 2017 at 8:10 PM
>
> *To: *Darrell Ball
> *Cc: *"ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org"
> *Subject: *Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK IP fragmentation require
Hi All,
I am using OVS2.7.0 and DPDK 16.11, and testing rate limit function.
I found that if the policing_rate is set very large, say 5Gbps, the rate is
limited dramatically to very low value, like 800Mbps.
The command is as below:
ovs-vsctl set interface port-7zel2so9sg ingress_policing_rate=50
& DPDK, have you
tried the same tests using the latest OVS 2.9 and DPDK 17.11?
Ian
From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org
[mailto:ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of michael me
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 10:42 AM
To: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: [ovs-discuss]
gt; *From:* ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-discuss-bounces@
> openvswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *michael me
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 17, 2018 10:42 AM
> *To:* ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
> *Subject:* [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk performance not stable
>
>
>
> Hi Eve
me [mailto:1michaelmesgu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 2:23 PM
To: Stokes, Ian
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk performance not stable
Hi Ian,
In the deployment i do have vhost user; below is the full output of the
ovs-appctl dpif-netdev/pmd
y even if some of the configuration
> commands may have changed
>
>
>
> https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/configure-vhost-
> user-multiqueue-for-ovs-with-dpdk
>
>
>
> Ian
>
>
>
> *From:* michael me [mailto:1michaelmesgu...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednes
scuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk performance not stable
Hi Ian,
Thank you for you answers!
it is correct that i am using ovs-vsctl set Interface dpdk0 options:n_rxq=8
commands for the queues.
Could you please expand on the sentence " It will be split between queues
based
From: Stokes, Ian
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 9:51 PM
To: michael me <1michaelmesgu...@gmail.com>
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org; Mooney, Sean K
Subject: RE: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk performance not stable
Hi Michael,
“It will be split between queues based on des tip so it’s importan
:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Stokes, Ian
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 19, 2018 9:51 PM
> *To:* michael me <1michaelmesgu...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org; Mooney, Sean K >
> *Subject:* RE: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk performance not stable
>
>
>
> Hi Michael,
&
Pradeep
I have tried few tests by trying to turn on TSO , but according to my
observation, ovs-dpdk doesn't support TSO Offloading.
You can try this reference from the following page:
http://dpdk-test-plans.readthedocs.io/en/latest/vhost_tso_test_plan.html
Thanks
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:39 A
I believe I had same issue and patch is available in 2.16.x version of OVS. TSO
TX offload not supported in OVS.
I’m not expert so let someone else chime in.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 5, 2021, at 2:32 PM, Thilak Raj Surendra Babu
> wrote:
>
>
> Hello Folks,
> I have a host with a DPDK
Thanks for your reply!
Can you share the commit that had disabled it in the later versions if you have
it handy?
Thanks
Thilak Raj S
From: Satish Patel
Sent: 06 November 2021 07:25
To: Thilak Raj Surendra Babu
Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk and userspace
Hi,ALL
After natted, hash values caculated from key and rev_key are different, natted
conn is for lookup
connection if packet come from reply dirction. natted conn is not add count of
connections.
memory doubled if natted
Hi, ALL
A assert panic was trigger when I run ovs-dpdk tests.
one v
Hi,
it looks like I ran into the same bug
(https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2022-September/052065.html).
Did you find a solution for the problem?
Best regards
Michael
___
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.ope
Hello all,
I need to run OVS-DPDK version inside several virtual machines for testing out
some scenarios. Is it possible to install OVS-DPDK inside the VM and configure
one ore more of its interfaces as dpdk ports? If yes what type of interfaces do
I need to attach to the VM and which pmd driv
Hello everyone,
I’m enabling DPDK on a system and I don’t see any errors while doing so.
However, after enabling DPDK, I can see that my system has way less free
hugepages than expected. It should only be using 512 at that point but it’s
using 1914. OvS is the only potential candidate that can
1 - 100 of 245 matches
Mail list logo
