Python 2.4.4 works too. Both of these are on a 32 bit system. I just
re-read your message and saw that you're on a 64 bit system. Let me
try on the 64 bit system I have here and see what happens. But I won't
be able to get to it till tomorrow...
The sys.lib on 2.5 and 2.4.4 both come up as no attr
Just to let you know, I ran
./configure --with-python=/opt/python2.5/bin/python2.5
and it worked as expected. I don't think the problem is with 2.4.3 vs
2.5 but we'll have to dig a bit more into the configure script to
figure out what's going on.
- Peter
On 12/6/06, Brad Clements <[EMAIL PROT
I just did a csv co, bootstrap, and now I run configure with
./configure --disable-owphp --disable-owperl
--with-python=/usr/local/bin/python2.4
But python doesn't get enabled. I know I've mentioned this problem on the list
a
while back, and finally resorted to hacking configure. But, has a
Hi -
I just committed a new version to CVS with a couple of changes. It's
now possible to set the value of a field:
>>> s = Sensor('/10.B7B64D000800', 'localhost', 9876)
>>> s.temphigh
100
>>> s.temphigh = 98
>>> s.temphigh
98
Also note that the type of values have changed. The ownet code now
tr
Replies inline.
On 12/6/06, Paul Alfille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Curiouser and curiouser.
>
> So your tests are
> A -- single loop against DS18S20 sensor A
> A+A -- two processes against sensor A
> AB -- single loop against sensors A and B
> AB+AB -- two processes each AB style
>
> Only
Curiouser and curiouser.
So your tests are
A -- single loop against DS18S20 sensor A
A+A -- two processes against sensor A
AB -- single loop against sensors A and B
AB+AB -- two processes each AB style
Only AB+AB fails?
And the failure is after a number of readings?
Are A and B different? One
> The way I was doing my test was reading 4 sensors in a
> tight loop and then starting another process to read the same sensors.
> I'll modify the script to just hammer one of the sensors that throws
> the error.
>
Ok. in owpython i just did:
while 1:
temp = mySensor.temperature
print te
On 12/6/06, Paul Alfille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps there are some hints here.
> You are using external power (non-parasytic) and a DS18S20?
No, some of the DS18S20's are parasitic some are not. Only 2 are
throwing the error. If I remember correctly one is parasitic and one
isn't
>
Am Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 01:14 schrieb Paul Alfille:
> Currently, the only aggregate we support is the TAI-8570 barometer, which
> uses 2 DS2406. In that case, the DS2406 memory is used to point to the
> partner chip, so the aggregate can be "autodiscovered". There is certainly
> an appeal to
Yes, the "die" trim values and all that are exposed in OWFS.
Paul Alfille
On 12/6/06, Mark Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here.
David Lissuk who maintains 1wire.org has published a list of chips
identified to have the POR problem. Check over there for more details.
I've snatched it fr
Perhaps there are some hints here.
You are using external power (non-parasytic) and a DS18S20?
The code is supposed to lock the device (use a mutex to exclude other
threads from that chip) issue a CONVERT command, wait 1sec, then read
results. If it's functioning correctly, the only reason that 2
Here.
David Lissuk who maintains 1wire.org has published a list of chips
identified to have the POR problem. Check over there for more details.
I've snatched it from his page below:
06/02/04 - All DS18X20's B7 die chips identified
List of Chips with the B7 Die
1. Read the 18X20's ROM code.
Eric Vickery wrote:
> I disagree. 85 is a valid reading since the chip can read from -10 to
You disagree with what...? If with "It's inconsequential in the scheme
of things." I meant to say in the scheme of things in my software. It
*may not* be inconsequential for engineers who are trying to
Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2006 23:05 schrieb Gregg Levine:
>
> Oh and Jan do you want a GMail account to add to your lists of addresses?
>
Thanks for the invitation, but I don't really need it -- gmx.de has fit my
needs for years now. And I don't trust google besides from search results.
^___^
Fantastic! Once I've got my linux box back on the wireless network
(Don't ask) I'll beat it around for you.
Chris.
Peter Kropf wrote:
>Hi -
>
>I've committed to CVS the first draft of a new python module called
>ownet. It allows for interaction with a remote owserver without the
>need to have t
15 matches
Mail list logo
