fact that you don't care about (or seem to even notice) the
> less than ideal actions of thermostats doesn't make it something others
> should not pursue.
>
> People who walk into my house instantly feel the difference from how a
> normal house feels. That's not an acci
need to be defined by the components in the particular
> system and the service agreements between messaging agents that present
> those components. My goal is to be able to have agents that implement
> control algorithms / architectures and allow those to interact with real
> world syste
need to be defined by the components in the particular
> system and the service agreements between messaging agents that present
> those components. My goal is to be able to have agents that implement
> control algorithms / architectures and allow those to interact with real
> world syste
> On Feb 23, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>
> Arley Carter writes:
>
>> Have you looked at the work done by the OPC Consortium?
>
> Not yet.
>
> [three hours later] O … K … Skip ahead if you don't want to read me ranting.
>
> If you want
Have you looked at the work done by the OPC Consortium? They are rather
far down the track in the direction you are headed.
It is a quasi-open source project (membership in the club required ). I
believe it was initially funded by Siemens, AB, Honeywell and others.
In other words heavy hitter
What you are proposing appears to be a large development project with
lots of risks that aren't addressed in the doc you have published thus far.
Some ideas to consider:
1. Scope of project release 0.10, deliverables and time line for
reference release 0.1
2. Funding necessary for 1 above
3.
Has anybody used Jerry Scharf's python script recently?
I changed the import psycopg to import psycopg2
and ow.init to /dev/ttyUSB0.
The script runs but doesn't read any sensors.
outputs "sensors read = 0 " on each loop.
Any ideas out there?
Perhaps Jerry could provide insight if he is out there?
