Am 04.12.2016 um 10:19 schrieb Rainer Dorsch:
> Hi Jan,
>
> the state of the patches is still new, does that mean they are far
> away from being integrated in mainline? If yes, do you have any
> experience or estimate how long it takes to see your nice patches in
> mainline?
>
You have to ask
Hi Jan,
the state of the patches is still new, does that mean they are far away from
being integrated in mainline? If yes, do you have any experience or estimate
how long it takes to see your nice patches in mainline?
Many thanks for the patches
Rainer
On Saturday 08 October 2016 00:03:54 Jan
Am 07.10.2016 um 23:05 schrieb Rainer Dorsch:
>
> Do you have any plans to upstream it? I think if you do, many more people
> benefit from it...
>
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/678037/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/678038/
Kind regards
Jan
Hi Jan,
On Sunday 10 July 2016 03:21:13 Jan Kandziora wrote:
> Am 29.12.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Ursin Soler:
> >
> > By this year (initial release 7/15) Maxim released the DS28E17 [1]
> > which is in my oppinion a game changer. This is (to my knowledge) the
> > first time a 1-wire slave has been
Am 29.12.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Ursin Soler:
>
> By this year (initial release 7/15) Maxim released the DS28E17 [1]
> which is in my oppinion a game changer. This is (to my knowledge) the
> first time a 1-wire slave has been released that allows to connect
> any micro-proc (like Arduino/AVR) in a
On 04.01.2016 09:36, Solèr Ursin wrote:
> I guess this "adding code written in whatever language" does not affect the
> slaves, right?
Nope. This is about code that interfaces with OWserver (or KNX or …).
> I guess an e.g. AVR type of 1wire slave will be some C/C++ derivate or ASM,
> correct?
>> I do agree here as well, but I have to ask for a simple MOAT example,
>> beginners guide,
>> how to tutorial that explains how to get started with MOAT (set it up from
>> bare metal).
>> I did not had the time to look into MOAT yet - can you tell me how complex
>> the code is?
>> Is it
Hello
Thanks for your participation and hints.
> I don't get what you mean by "generic interface as for any other chip
> supported by OWFS". Do you mean we should provide a framework for
> bitbanging arbitrary data through the I?C interface, tunneled through
> onewire?
What I think of is an
Am 02.01.2016 um 01:08 schrieb Solèr Ursin:
Am 01.01.2016 um 14:25 schrieb Solèr Ursin:
> Hello
>
> Thanks for your participation and hints.
>
>> I don't get what you mean by "generic interface as for any other
>> chip supported by OWFS". Do you mean we should provide a framework
>> for
Am 29.12.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Ursin Soler:
>
> By this year (initial release 7/15) Maxim released the DS28E17 [1]
> which is in my oppinion a game changer.
>
I like to add, the DS28E17 is only available in a very tiny 16TQFN-EP
package, which is very hard to solder by hand (0.5mm pitch, no
I can see no reason for not using moat, aside from differences in failure
state, if any.
C
> On Dec 29, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Jan Kandziora wrote:
>
>> Am 29.12.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Ursin Soler:
>>
>> By this year (initial release 7/15) Maxim released the DS28E17 [1]
>> which is
Am 29.12.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Ursin Soler:
>
> By this year (initial release 7/15) Maxim released the DS28E17 [1]
> which is in my oppinion a game changer. This is (to my knowledge) the
> first time a 1-wire slave has been released that allows to connect
> any micro-proc (like Arduino/AVR) in a
Hello!
By this year (initial release 7/15) Maxim released the DS28E17 [1] which is in
my oppinion a game changer. This is (to my knowledge) the first time a 1-wire
slave has been released that allows to connect any micro-proc (like
Arduino/AVR) in a generic and easy way. Even though the DS2408
On 30.12.2015 06:02, Jan Kandziora wrote:
> is it possible to create a Onewire->I²C bridge with your MOAT? If
> possible as a drop-in replacement of the DS28E17, at least from onewire
> view?
I see no immediate technical problem with either mimicing the 'E17 or
adding a I²C bus channel to the
Am 30.12.2015 um 06:37 schrieb Matthias Urlichs:
> On 30.12.2015 06:02, Jan Kandziora wrote:
>> is it possible to create a Onewire->I²C bridge with your MOAT? If
>> possible as a drop-in replacement of the DS28E17, at least from onewire
>> view?
>
> I see no immediate technical problem with
Am 29.12.2015 um 19:43 schrieb Jan Kandziora:
> Am 29.12.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Ursin Soler:
>>
>> By this year (initial release 7/15) Maxim released the DS28E17 [1]
>> which is in my oppinion a game changer.
>>
> I like to add, the DS28E17 is only available in a very tiny 16TQFN-EP
> package,
16 matches
Mail list logo