ded in the Action Pack distribution for evaluation
and demonstration purposes and cannot be upgraded with additional user
licences or CALs.
Microsoft Dynamics CRM 4.0 (workgroup edition CALs) Business Solutions 5
CALs may be used in user or device mode.
Cheers,
Trevor Andrew
From: ozd
as
Victoria Park, Western Australia
_
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Trevor Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, 24 March 2010 5:38 PM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: [OT] Action Pack subscription
Hi Ian,
I renewed mine most recently a
the Empower program will already have Access to VS2010?
So if anyone has thoughts / opinions / experiences regarding the Empower
program, or greater detail on the new "Development and Design" Action Pack,
I'd be delighted to hear them.
Cheers,
Trevor Andrew
Hi Jorke (and list),
Any further news on these changes?
Regards,
Trevor Andrew
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Jorke Odolphi
Sent: Thursday, 15 April 2010 10:06 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: RE: Empower Program being terminated / new
HI Michael,
The things you need to ask an account about is "How familiar are you with
Personal Services Income workers". That's the ATO term for contractors who
earn 100% or nearly 100% of their income from a single source.
If you don't have multiple clients then the Tax Office wants you to
l-time job does it J
Cheers,
Trev
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of David Burstin
Sent: Thursday, 29 April 2010 5:12 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Contracting to a single company
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Trevor Andrew
wrote:
ould hear her complain about it. And I have
to really pay her to do it. The ATO understand.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:12 PM, David Burstin
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Trevor Andrew
wrote:
What they don't want to see is your company earns X, and you pay a salary of
X/2 to you
That kind of thing only.
Cheers.
James.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Trevor Andrew
Sent: Friday, 30 April 2010 11:58
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: Contracting to a single company
Hi James,
But if you are a "one
:19, Trevor Andrew wrote:
I guess the reason I responded originally was that the original poster
(Michael) thought that working in this way was no longer possible, or that you
were in some way in breach of ATO laws and regulations.
The complexity of this thread and the differing opinions should
Hi Matt,
Text wrapping got the best of you I suspect ... The 'x' from the .aspx
extension was wrapped onto the next line of the message.
Cheers,
Trevor
-Original Message-
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, 2 June
wn opinion.
But I'm pretty sure that this isn't the forum to express them.
Cheers,
Trevor Andrew
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of .net noobie
Sent: Saturday, 10 July 2010 3:04 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Friday - Con
David,
I think that Stephen's original rant was not that this was one example of a
page documentation needing improvement, but that the entire style of the
documentation is so minimal as to be close to useless.
Unless I'm getting to the wrong bits, very little of the documentation I
reach i
12 matches
Mail list logo
