On 4 March 2016 at 18:03, Greg Keogh wrote:
> Folks, anyone using Azure Tables Storage in anger? I really like it, simple
> and effective.
>
> What is the query syntax equivalent of SQL "not null", that is, a row has a
> named property? I have a table with tens of thousands of rows, but only a
> s
>
> I stumbled upon this MSDN "Patterns and Practises" page that describes
> what I am talking about.
>
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-au/library/dn589791.aspx
>
I like that article, it's sensible and it describes when you should and
should not use the technique of making artificial indexes to
Greg,
On 4 March 2016 at 18:03, Greg Keogh wrote:
> Folks, anyone using Azure Tables Storage in anger? I really like it, simple
> and effective.
>
> What is the query syntax equivalent of SQL "not null", that is, a row has a
> named property? I have a table with tens of thousands of rows, but onl
On 4 March 2016 at 18:03, Greg Keogh wrote:
> Folks, anyone using Azure Tables Storage in anger? I really like it, simple
> and effective.
>
> What is the query syntax equivalent of SQL "not null", that is, a row has a
> named property? I have a table with tens of thousands of rows, but only a
> s
mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913 fax
SQL Down Under | Web: www.sqldownunder.com<http://www.sqldownunder.com/>
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Greg Keogh
Sent: Monday, 7 March 2016 10:09 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Azure Table query "not n
ent).
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg
>
> Dr Greg Low
>
> 1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913
> fax
> SQL Down Under | Web: www.sqldownunder.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-b
gt;
> Dr Greg Low
>
>
>
> 1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913
> fax
>
> SQL Down Under | Web: www.sqldownunder.com
>
>
>
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Greg Keog
| Web: www.sqldownunder.com<http://www.sqldownunder.com/>
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Greg Keogh
Sent: Monday, 7 March 2016 9:46 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Azure Table query "not null"
Hi Ian et al, I reckon most of th
on SO – see the side-panel links to
> other questions on null testing) some of which lead to Microsoft guides,
> which may be helpful.
>
>
>
> Ian Thomas
>
> Albert Park, Victoria 3206 Australia
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Greg Low (??)
Sent: Sunday, 6 March 2016 10:19 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: RE: Azure Table query "not null"
Hi Ian,
It’s a tough question.
For me, the biggest issue is where th
zdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Ian Thomas
Sent: Sunday, 6 March 2016 6:45 PM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: Azure Table query "not null"
I wondered about Azure SQL vs Azure Table Storage pros and cons, and to lessen
my ignorance looked at a few Q&A at Stackoverflow.
This par
ject: Re: Azure Table query "not null"
On 4 March 2016 at 18:03, Greg Keogh wrote:
> Folks, anyone using Azure Tables Storage in anger? I really like it,
> simple and effective.
>
> What is the query syntax equivalent of SQL "not null", that is, a row
>
--Original Message-
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Thomas Koster
Sent: Sunday, 6 March 2016 5:27 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Azure Table query "not null"
On 4 March 2016 at 18:03, Greg Keogh < <mailto:gfke...@gma
On 4 March 2016 at 18:03, Greg Keogh wrote:
> Folks, anyone using Azure Tables Storage in anger? I really like it, simple
> and effective.
>
> What is the query syntax equivalent of SQL "not null", that is, a row has a
> named property? I have a table with tens of thousands of rows, but only a
> s
14 matches
Mail list logo
