Hi,
I observed the following in pacemaker Versions 1.1.3 and tip up to patch
10258.
In a small test environment to study fail-count behavior I have one
resource
anything
doing sleep 600 with monitoring interval 10 secs.
The failure-timeout is 300.
I would expect to never see a failcount highe
obtained and
the other one could not be obtained on a different node
IMHO sdb is not an alternative as this introduces a SPOF.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Holger Teutsch
From: Vladislav Bogdanov
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Date: 04.10.2010 06:33
Subject
The resource failed when the sleep expired, i.e. each 600 secs.
Now I changed the resource to
sleep 7200, failure-timeout 3600
i.e. to values far beyond the recheck-interval opf 15m.
Now everything behaves as expected.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Holger Teutsch
From
Hi,
found and fixed an error in Clusters from Scratch
- holger
___
WEB.DE DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 €/mtl.! Jetzt auch mit
gratis Notebook-Flat! http://produkte.web.de/go/DSL_Doppel_Flatrate/2
# HG changeset patch
# User Holger Teutsch
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 10:21 +0100, Christoph Herrmann wrote:
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Andrew Beekhof
> Gesendet: Di 11.01.2011 09:01
> An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager ;
> CC: Michael Schwartzkopff ;
> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Split-site cluster in two locations
>
>
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 17:10 +0100, Christoph Herrmann wrote:
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Dejan Muhamedagic
> Gesendet: Fr 14.01.2011 12:31
> An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager ;
> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Howto write a STONITH agent
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011
Hi,
the packages from rpm-next(64bit) for opensuse 11.3 do not install there (at
least true for 1.1.4 and 1.1.5).
The plugin is in
./usr/lib/lcrso/pacemaker.lcrso
but should be in
./usr/lib64/lcrso/pacemaker.lcrso
I think the patch below (borrowed from the 'official' packages) cures.
Regards
Ho
At least for Opensuse 11.3 x86_64. May be the title of my previous mail
was misleading.
-h
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 17:57 +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> Hi,
> the packages from rpm-next(64bit) for opensuse 11.3 do not install there (at
> least true for 1.1.4 and 1.1.5).
>
> The plugi
Hi,
small fix -> reload is implemented
- holger
diff -r cf4e9febed8e doc/Pacemaker_Explained/en-US/Ap-OCF.xml
--- a/doc/Pacemaker_Explained/en-US/Ap-OCF.xml Wed Feb 23 14:52:34 2011 +0100
+++ b/doc/Pacemaker_Explained/en-US/Ap-OCF.xml Tue Mar 01 09:34:55 2011 +0100
@@ -81,9 +81,8 @@
Hi,
I submit a patch for
"bugzilla 2541: Shell should warn if parameter uniqueness is violated"
for discussion.
devel1:~ # crm configure
crm(live)configure# primitive ip1a ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 params ip="1.2.3.4"
meta target-role="stopped"
crm(live)configure# primitive ip1b ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 10:55 +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 2011-03-03 10:43, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I submit a patch for
> > "bugzilla 2541: Shell should warn if parameter uniqueness is violated"
> > for discussion.
>
> I'll leav
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 12:40 +0100, patrik.rappo...@knapp.com wrote:
Hi,
assume the basic problem is in your raid configuration.
If you unmap one box the devices should not be in status FAIL but in
degraded.
So what is the exit status of
mdadm --detail --test /dev/md0
after unmapping ?
Furtherm
NAPP does not accept any liability for damage
> sustained as a result of such attachment being virus infected and
> strongly recommend that you carry out your own virus check before
> opening any attachment.
>
>
> Holger Teutsch
>
>
> 06.03.2011 19:56
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 13:06 +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 10:55 +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
> > On 2011-03-03 10:43, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I submit a patch for
> > > "bugzilla 2541: Shell should warn if parameter uni
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 12:07 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:15:01AM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 13:06 +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 10:55 +0100, Florian Haas wrot
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 19:26 +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 12:07 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi Holger,
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:15:01AM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2011-03-04
Hi Dejan,
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:00 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Holger,
> > > >
> > > > This would become:
> > > >
> > > >for p in all_obj_list: # passed from _verify()
> > > >if is_primitive(p.node):
> > > >
> > > > > +process_pri
Hi Dejan,
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 10:14 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 07:58:02PM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > Hi Dejan,
> >
> > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:00 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > > Hi Holger,
> >
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 14:21 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 09:12:46AM -0500, David McCurley wrote:
> > Are you wanting to move all the resources back or just that one resource?
> >
> > I'm still learning, but one simple way I move all resources back from nodeb
ing like
"crm_resource --move-off --resource myresource --node devel2" ?
or should
crm_resource refuse to work on clones
and/or should moving the master role be the default for m/s resources
and the "--master" option discarded ?
Regards
Holger
# HG changeset patch
# Use
Hi Dejan,
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 14:24 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:21:40PM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I would like to submit 2 patches of an initial implementation for
> > discussion.
..
> > To recall:
>
Hi Dejan,
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:11 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:55:57AM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > Hi Dejan,
> >
> > On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 14:24 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > &
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 11:05 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Holger Teutsch
> wrote:
> > Hi Dejan,
> >
> > On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 14:24 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 a
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 15:24 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 11:05 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Holger Teutsch
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Dejan,
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 21:31 +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 15:24 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Holger Teutsch
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 11:05 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Mar
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 11:48 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:31:02PM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 15:24 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > crm_resource --move-off --resourc
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 12:27 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > Hi Dejan,
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 11:48 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > > Hi Holger,
> > >
> > >
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 13:40 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:19:56PM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > Hi Dejan,
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 12:27 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:38 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:00:36PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic
> > wrote:
> > > Ah, right, sorry, wanted to ask about the difference between
> > > move-off and move. The descripti
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 08:57 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:38 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:00:36PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> > On Tue,
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 12:33 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > New syntax:
> > ---
> >
> > crm_resource --move-from --resource myresource --node mynode
> >-> all resource variants: check whether active on mynode, then create
> > standby constraint
> >
> > crm_resource --move-from --
Hi,
during work on the move-XXX stuff I discovered this.
Regards
Holger
# HG changeset patch
# User Holger Teutsch
# Date 1302259903 -7200
# Branch mig
# Node ID caed31174dc966450a31da048b640201980870a8
# Parent 9451c288259b7b9fd6f32f5df01d47569e570c58
Low: lib/common/utils.c: Don't t
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 20:50 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> why?
> CMD_ERR("Resource %s not moved:"
> " specifying --master is not supported for
> --move-from\n", rsc_id);
>
it did not look sensible to me but I can't recall the exact reasons 8-)
It's now implemented.
> also
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 17:58 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:31:33PM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 20:50 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > > why?
> > >
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 09:41 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >>
> > Unfortunately the devel code does not run at all in my environment so I
> > have to fix this first.
>
> Oh? I ran CTS on it the other day and it was fine here.
>
I installed pacemaker-devel on top of a compilation of pacemaker-1.
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:03 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Holger Teutsch
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 09:41 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >>> >>
> &g
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 16:15 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:03 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> > On Thu, May 5, 2
I had 1.1 but Dejan asked my to rebase my patches on devel.
So long story short: devel now works after upgrading to the rev you
mentioned and I got back to working on my patches.
Thanx
Holger
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 10:58 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> I thought you said you were running 1.1?
>
>
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 13:25 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Holger Teutsch wrote:
...
> > Remaining diffs seem to be not related to my changes.
>
> Unlikely I'm afraid. We run the regression tests after every commit
> and complain loudly
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 08:24 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Holger Teutsch wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 13:25 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Holger Teutsch
> >> wrote:
> > ...
> >> &
40 matches
Mail list logo
