On 2013-04-21T09:57:02, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Because the author wanted it removed from Pacemaker, at which point someone
> would have needed to navigate the red tape to get it back into the
> distribution.
It is easier to include a new package in Fedora than to manage a package
split? I had
On 19/04/2013, at 7:37 PM, T. wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
>> No, you're definitely not missing anything. The 'pcs cluster cib'
>> output isn't pretty.
> why there is an approach to build a new config-tool at all?
>
> Why not use the crmsh? Why it was dropped in the RHEL-build?
Because the author wa
On 19/04/2013, at 8:18 PM, emmanuel segura wrote:
> I don't know why redhat doesn't give to the users the alternatives to use
> what they want
Because they'd have to support both options which means double the engineering
+ QE effort.
More actually because people would end up using both and t
I don't know why redhat doesn't give to the users the alternatives to use
what they want
sorry for my ugly english :-)
Thanks
2013/4/19 T.
> Hi Chris,
>
> > No, you're definitely not missing anything. The 'pcs cluster cib'
> > output isn't pretty.
> why there is an approach to build a new co
Hi Chris,
> No, you're definitely not missing anything. The 'pcs cluster cib'
> output isn't pretty.
why there is an approach to build a new config-tool at all?
Why not use the crmsh? Why it was dropped in the RHEL-build?
Does it have some relevant disadvantages?
--
To Answer please replace "in
On 04/17/13 23:05, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On Apr 17, 2013, at 8:04 PM, Chris Feist wrote:
On 04/17/13 11:13, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On Apr 17, 2013, at 11:57 AM, T. wrote:
Hi,
b) If I can't do it woith pcs, is there a reliable
and secure way to do it with pacemaker low level tools?
why not
On Apr 17, 2013, at 8:04 PM, Chris Feist wrote:
> On 04/17/13 11:13, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 17, 2013, at 11:57 AM, T. wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
b) If I can't do it woith pcs, is there a reliable
and secure way to do it with pacemaker low level tools?
>>> why not just installin
On 04/17/13 11:13, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On Apr 17, 2013, at 11:57 AM, T. wrote:
Hi,
b) If I can't do it woith pcs, is there a reliable
and secure way to do it with pacemaker low level tools?
why not just installing the crmsh from a different repository?
This is what I have done on CentOS 6
On 18/04/2013, at 2:13 AM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 11:57 AM, T. wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> b) If I can't do it woith pcs, is there a reliable
>>> and secure way to do it with pacemaker low level tools?
>> why not just installing the crmsh from a different repository?
>>
>> T
Thank you for the links.
Best regards
Andreas Mock
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: T. [mailto:nos...@godawa.de]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 21:44
An: pacema...@clusterlabs.org
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] pcs equivalent of crm configure erase
Hi,
> Can you please point me t
Hi,
> Can you please point me to a repository where I can find
> crmsh fitting to RHEL6.4 or clones?
haven't looked if there is a repo-file, I just installed via RPM:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/ha-clustering/CentOS_CentOS-6/x86_64/crmsh-1.2.5-55.3.x86_64.rpm
http://downlo
Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] pcs equivalent of crm configure erase
On Apr 17, 2013, at 11:57 AM, T. wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> b) If I can't do it woith pcs, is there a reliable and secure way to
>> do it with pacemaker low level tools?
> why not just i
On Apr 17, 2013, at 11:57 AM, T. wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> b) If I can't do it woith pcs, is there a reliable
>> and secure way to do it with pacemaker low level tools?
> why not just installing the crmsh from a different repository?
>
> This is what I have done on CentOS 6.4.
My sentiments exactly. A
Hi,
> b) If I can't do it woith pcs, is there a reliable
> and secure way to do it with pacemaker low level tools?
why not just installing the crmsh from a different repository?
This is what I have done on CentOS 6.4.
--
Chau y hasta luego,
Thorolf
___
, 17. April 2013 00:23
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Cc: Andreas Mock
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] pcs equivalent of crm configure erase
On 04/14/13 02:52, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> can someone tell me what the pcs equivalent to
>
> crm configure erase is?
From m
On 04/14/13 02:52, Andreas Mock wrote:
Hi all,
can someone tell me what the pcs equivalent to
crm configure erase is?
From my understanding, 'crm configure erase' will remove everything from the
configuration file except for the nodes.
Are you trying to clear your configuration out and sta
icht-
Von: Rasto Levrinc [mailto:rasto.levr...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. April 2013 10:45
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] pcs equivalent of crm configure erase
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I try to b
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I try to bring that topic up once again because
> it's still unresolved for me:
>
> a) How can I do the equivalent of 'crm configure erase'
> in pcs? Is there a way?
>
> b) If I can't do it woith pcs, is there a reliable
> and secu
Thank you in advance.
Best regards
Andreas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Gesendet: Montag, 15. April 2013 05:49
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] pcs equivalent of crm configure erase
On 14/04/2013, at 5
ger
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] pcs equivalent of crm configure erase
On 14/04/2013, at 5:52 PM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> can someone tell me what the pcs equivalent to crm configure erase is?
>
> Is there a pcs cheat sheet showing the common tasks?
> Or a doc
On 14/04/2013, at 5:52 PM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> can someone tell me what the pcs equivalent to
> crm configure erase is?
>
> Is there a pcs cheat sheet showing the common tasks?
> Or a documentation?
"pcs help" should be reasonably informative, but I don't see anything equivale
21 matches
Mail list logo
