https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981200
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915144
--- Comment #26 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Not sure.
Waiting for reviewer.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915144
--- Comment #27 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich kr...@land.ru ---
If you don't mind, I would like to left both of them.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667
Bug ID: 988667
Summary: Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the
vala project
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988682
Bug ID: 988682
Summary: Review Request: narayana - Distributed Transaction
Manager
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988682
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988687
Bug ID: 988687
Summary: Review Request: merge review: skkdic - Dictionaries
for SKK (Simple Kana-Kanji conversion program)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988687
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
--- Comment #35 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
the %{_isa} macro which the guide does not also appear to recommend.
Sure it does.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
Requires: cairo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950699
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987433
Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akozu...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950699
Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987472
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915144
--- Comment #28 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Which type to remove, txt or html?
Neither one. ;-p Keep'em all. Nothing wrong with that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988687
Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988102
--- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
2. Why mark these as %doc:
*.pod eg ?
That's a strange question. Could you be more verbose, please, and explain your
thoughts?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987433
Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988687
Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950699
--- Comment #19 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
OK. No need to open a new bug. I just sent an email to him.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987433
--- Comment #2 from Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com ---
the package builds fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987433
--- Comment #1 from Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com ---
automated output seems fine:
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987433
--- Comment #3 from Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com ---
rpmlint on the spec gives warnings:
[akozumpl@localhost ~/Downloads]$ rpmlint libcomps.spec
libcomps.spec:5: W: macro-in-comment %global
libcomps.spec:119: W: macro-in-comment %doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987433
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Remove rm -rf %{buildroot} in install section.
Suggestions:
README.md COPYING can be put into main package, -doc subpackage should only
contains some real documents.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987433
--- Comment #5 from Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com ---
This is a nit, but can you please change the description from:
Alternative for yum.comps written in C
It shouldn't reference yum.comps as that's about to disappear soon and many
people
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877096
--- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Please run rpmlint (or rpmlint -I) on the src.rpm *and* all built rpms. Feel
free to ignore obvious false positives, but fix reported issues and/or comment
on them.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988102
--- Comment #10 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #8)
Thanks, for you remarks.
This package is in my repo ;) I've packaged it.
Issues besides Bjorn's:
1. Remove find %{buildroot}
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988102
--- Comment #11 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Björn Esser from comment #10)
Any clarifying link to this? For which dists this is fixed? Is el5 still
affected or are things fixed there, too?
As far as I see, this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987433
Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986550
--- Comment #8 from Lars Kiesow lkie...@uos.de ---
Suggestions included.
New files can be found here:
Spec URL: http://larskiesow.de/python-xmp-toolkit/python-xmp-toolkit.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984360
--- Comment #8 from Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com ---
If you want the review to proceed, you can just apply the aforementioned
changes to the spec file; it is perfectly acceptable to add autotools in
BuildRequires.
You can later remove
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988728
Bug ID: 988728
Summary: Review Request: chinese-calendar - Chinese traditional
calendar
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895073
Marcel Wysocki m...@satgnu.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(m...@satgnu.net) |
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=91
Matej Stuchlik mstuc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=91
--- Comment #14 from Matej Stuchlik mstuc...@redhat.com ---
Whops, that was supposed to be:
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: python-flask-admin
New Branches: el6
Owners: mstuchli
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894413
Marcel Wysocki m...@satgnu.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(m...@satgnu.net) |
--- Comment #28 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988102
--- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
But if you say el5, I think you may need to preserve it again.
Nope. ;-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984360
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
NEW SPEC URL: http://cicku.me/joyce.spec
NEW SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/joyce-2.2.5-2.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961419
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Hi,
Since versioned docdir path will be replaced by unversioned, can you revise
your spec?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs
Thanks.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833115
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832698
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bress...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909674
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
I think you should change BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel
to
BuildRequires: python-setuptools.
And, can you explain this:
# debian dash doesn't support pushd?
Thanks.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988193
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983784
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mray...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980851
Dario Faggioli raist...@linux.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984360
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894413
--- Comment #29 from Marcel Wysocki m...@satgnu.net ---
Update:
Spec URL: http://maci.satgnu.net/rpmbuild/SPECS/davmail.spec
SRPM URL: http://maci.satgnu.net/rpmbuild/SRPMS/davmail-4.3.3-3.fc19.src.rpm
Changelog:
* Fri Jul 26 2013 maci
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980851
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(cicku...@gmail.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821404
--- Comment #32 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/RussianFedora/gimp-dds-plugin/master/gimp-dds-plugin.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988789
Bug ID: 988789
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-hoptoad_notifier - Send your
application errors to our hosted service and reclaim
your inbox
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904843
--- Comment #38 from Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com ---
The original patches that provided this
support are still carried along for iasl
Thanks for confirming, that's enough to avoid regressions!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875213
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875213
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=91
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981200
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=91
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981200
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986715
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986715
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981200
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962838
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mgold...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988818
Bug ID: 988818
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-xmlhash - A small C module
that wraps libxml2's xmlreader to parse a XML string
into a ruby hash
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905304
--- Comment #24 from Patrick Laimbock patr...@laimbock.com ---
Created attachment 778766
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=778766action=edit
OpenDMARC spec file version 1.1.3-3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905304
--- Comment #25 from Patrick Laimbock patr...@laimbock.com ---
Created attachment 778767
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=778767action=edit
OpenDMARC SRPM version 1.1.3-3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905304
--- Comment #26 from Patrick Laimbock patr...@laimbock.com ---
Here are the updated spec file and SRPM (version 1.1.3-3).
About the list in comment #23:
0) I tested the package with the default config and it starts (and stops) fine
1)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905304
--- Comment #27 from Patrick Laimbock patr...@laimbock.com ---
Changelog from the spec file for easier browsing:
* Mon Jul 22 2013 Patrick Laimbock patr...@laimbock.com 1.1.3-3
- add %{?_isa} to Requires
- add sendmail-milter to Requires
- set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827723
antonio montagnani antonio.montagn...@alice.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827723
--- Comment #13 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com ---
You will need to install, setup trytond, tryton and postgresql using the
installation documentation at:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/GNU_Health/Installation
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985129
--- Comment #7 from Veaceslav Mindru mind...@gmail.com ---
Name: text2nato
Version: 0.4
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Convert text into nato phonetic alphabet
Group: Applications/Text
License: GPLv2+
%description
Convert text
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988853
Bug ID: 988853
Summary: Review Request: libevent2 - Abstract asynchronous
event notification library [EPEL]
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988853
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905304
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #772337|0 |1
is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988866
Bug ID: 988866
Summary: Review Request:php-pecl-event - Provides interface to
libevent library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979738
--- Comment #9 from Nazar Mishturak na...@gmx.us ---
Does license tag apply only to binaries and files included in package?
Because this is what licence.txt says(#my comment):
Dungeon Crawl Stone Soup
Copyright 1997-2013 Linley Henzell, the dev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988890
Bug ID: 988890
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sass-twitter-bootstrap - Gem
of the Twitter Bootstrap
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985129
--- Comment #8 from Veaceslav Mindru mind...@gmail.com ---
Hopefully last version.
Name: text2nato
Version: 0.5
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Convert text into nato phonetic alphabet
Group: Applications/Text
License: GPLv2+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988890
--- Comment #1 from Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com ---
RPMLINT VALUES:
$ rpmlint rubygem-sass-twitter-bootstrap.spec
rubygem-sass-twitter-bootstrap-2.0.1-1.fc20.src.rpm
rubygem-sass-twitter-bootstrap-2.0.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967337
Axilleas Pipinellis axill...@archlinux.gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986715
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-cairocffi-0.5.1-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cairocffi-0.5.1-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986715
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986715
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-cairocffi-0.5.1-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cairocffi-0.5.1-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986715
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-cairocffi-0.5.1-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cairocffi-0.5.1-2.el6
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875213
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-cssselect-0.8-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cssselect-0.8-1.el6
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988938
Bug ID: 988938
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-orm_adapter - Provides a
single point of entry for using basic features of ruby
ORMs
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988938
--- Comment #1 from Axilleas Pipinellis axill...@archlinux.gr ---
Forgot koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5661167
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950699
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-path-3.0.1-2.fc19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986712
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985814
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985818
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848314
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986634
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974005
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|libuv-0.10.12-1.fc19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877096
--- Comment #8 from John Heidemann jo...@isi.edu ---
rpmlint found some problems; I'll fix them in the next release.
Thanks for the pointers wrt optimize/find/etc. There's some level of cargo
cultery there (rpm documentation is not always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816991
Axilleas Pipinellis axill...@archlinux.gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986715
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-cairocffi-0.5.1-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cairocffi-0.5.1-3.el6
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988997
Bug ID: 988997
Summary: Review Request: bfgminer - A BitCoin miner
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904843
--- Comment #39 from Al Stone a...@redhat.com ---
Successful koji scratch build for f19 on ppc/ppc64:
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1265768
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986608
--- Comment #5 from Eric Smith space...@gmail.com ---
All the prerequisites have been approved and submitted for updates, there are
koji buildroot overrides, and koji scratch builds have succeeded for rawhide,
f19, f18, and epel6.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989014
Bug ID: 989014
Summary: Review Request: jdf-stacks-client - JBoss Stacks
Parser
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989015
Bug ID: 989015
Summary: Review Request: makeself - Make self-extractable
archives on Unix
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
