https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988193
hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(johannes.lips@goo |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985129
--- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
There are several issues. For example, see comment 4. I hope I've found all of
them, but I could not find a working package:
* It would be helpful, if with each new release of your
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972237
--- Comment #8 from Dridi Boukelmoune dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com ---
Hi,
I've started packaging vcsh on my own and ended up merging my work with what's
already been done here :). It's also based on a more recent version from a
couple days ago.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988997
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lemen...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988193
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
%post
touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/elementary-xfce /dev/null ||:
touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/elementary-xfce-dark /dev/null ||:
touch --no-create
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988193
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Why do you think that? Note that all three directories are included in the
package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988193
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #8)
Why do you think that? Note that all three directories are included in the
package.
Just keep the same style with postun and posttrans.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953514
--- Comment #8 from Dridi Boukelmoune dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com ---
Hi,
During the last months, the version 0.2 of the module, Fedora 19, and Varnish
3.0.4 have been released :)
Since Varnish 3.0.4 hasn't been packaged yet, I've made new
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988193
--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
The scriptlets are wrong, though, and inconsistant.
Just keep the same style with postun and posttrans.
Better forget about style and make them correct.
First of all, don't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988102
--- Comment #13 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for the hint, Michael!
#
Marcus, let me get all needed spec-changes together here:
...snip...
find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
find
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915920
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986608
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
cairocffi is absent.
I'll handle this in the next week.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989068
Bug ID: 989068
Summary: Review Request: google-api-python-client - Google APIs
Client Library for Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989069
Bug ID: 989069
Summary: Review Request: python-uri-templates - A Python
implementation of URI Template
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989068
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988193
--- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner raph...@web.de ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #10)
…
First of all, don't compare touch with gtk-update-icon-cache. While
touch is a coreutils tool, gtk-update-icon-cache may not be installed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988193
--- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner raph...@web.de ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #11)
see also
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10319652/check-if-a-file-is-executable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986608
--- Comment #7 from Eric Smith space...@gmail.com ---
Absent? The python-cairocffi update is submitted and there is a koji build root
override in place, so weasyprint builds successfully in koji.
Next week is fine. Thanks for reviewing!
Eric
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988193
--- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Do what works for you.
I'm not here to argue about which way to do it or whether a non-existant
touch is worth supporting. I've only mentioned the purpose of those || :.
The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989014
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989014
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||989106
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989014
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989014
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971431
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849496
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989112
Bug ID: 989112
Summary: Review Request: gmqcc - Improved Quake C Compiler
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989112
Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837450
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android-4.1.1.4-1.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958533
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android-json-org-java.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/android-json-org-java-4.2.2-0.1.r1.2.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989112
--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com ---
new spec: http://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/gmqcc.spec
koji task: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5664763
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989112
--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com ---
new spec: http://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/gmqcc.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989112
--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com ---
new spec: http://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/gmqcc.spec
new SRPM:
http://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/gmqcc-0.2.9-1.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989112
Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989112
Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989014
--- Comment #2 from Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt ---
Thanks for the review! :)
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #1)
Problem(s):
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file
from upstream, the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989014
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894524
Axilleas Pipinellis axill...@archlinux.gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988890
Axilleas Pipinellis axill...@archlinux.gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||894524
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984360
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984360
--- Comment #13 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989014
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989014
--- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989112
--- Comment #7 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989112
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976052
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ger...@ryan.lt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976052
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829676
Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952229
Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952229
Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989112
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gmqcc-0.2.9-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gmqcc-0.2.9-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989112
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917191
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917191
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
awake-1.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/awake-1.0-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917191
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
awake-1.0-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/awake-1.0-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989014
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989014
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jdf-stacks-client-1.0.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jdf-stacks-client-1.0.1-1.fc19
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989132
Bug ID: 989132
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sanitize - Whitelist-based
HTML sanitizer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986715
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974889
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktdre...@ktdreyer.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977132
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-lodash-1.3.1-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-lodash-1.3.1-3.el6
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989143
Bug ID: 989143
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-charlock_holmes - Character
encoding detecting library for Ruby using ICU
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989132
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976052
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985916
Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(limburgher@gmail. |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989132
--- Comment #2 from Axilleas Pipinellis axill...@archlinux.gr ---
Thanks for the review :)
Both those issues you mentioned are forgotten ones from previous packaging
attempt. I will fix them and push the updated spec to repos.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989132
Axilleas Pipinellis axill...@archlinux.gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952229
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
canl-c++-1.0.0-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/canl-c++-1.0.0-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952229
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
canl-c++-1.0.0-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/canl-c++-1.0.0-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952229
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
canl-c++-1.0.0-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/canl-c++-1.0.0-3.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952229
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
canl-c++-1.0.0-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/canl-c++-1.0.0-3.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952229
Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mattias.ellert@fy |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988193
--- Comment #14 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
We don't need to care about bash, in fact they are installed as default in
Fedora. Guideline has rules.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982161
--- Comment #8 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com ---
Hi,
regarding mpfit, the original code is here:
http://cow.physics.wisc.edu/~craigm/idl/cmpfit.html
The code has been modified to interface with Python. The number and types of
the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982161
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
You might have to raise an exception at FPC if needed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985916
--- Comment #4 from Peter Ajamian pe...@pajamian.dhs.org ---
Manually reviewing the licensing in the files:
gtkhtml/htmlentity.c is listed as Unknown or generated, it has a clear LGPL2+
header in it, but it is part way down in the file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974889
--- Comment #6 from Alex Chernyakhovsky acher...@mit.edu ---
Hi Ken,
I've updated the latest at the same URLs as before:
Spec URL: http://web.mit.edu/achernya/www/fedora/rubygem-mysql2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983922
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982336
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982336
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-dropbox-1.6-3.fc18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970130
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|git-extras-1.8.0-3.fc19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989068
--- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com ---
Whenever you have the time works for me :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988997
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Well, I'm not sure if thing related to bitcoin is approved now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510
--- Comment #51 from Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com ---
Nicolas,
Before I can sponsor you, I need to see 2-3 package reviews you have executed.
If you are unable to review some packages to show you understand the packaging
guidelines, I will be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821404
Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988997
--- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #2)
Well, I'm not sure if thing related to bitcoin is approved now.
It was never disapproved. ECC on the other hand is still banned,
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821404
--- Comment #33 from Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com ---
Vasiliy,
pkgconfig is not needed as a buildrequires - see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRequires
I believe this directory is unowned. This can be fixed by using a
86 matches
Mail list logo
