https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
--- Comment #26 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Fixed.
---
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/libsodium.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/libsodium-0.4.5-2.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to František Dvořák from comment #8)
Yes, I can review it. :-)
Do you plan to push it to EPEL? I can imagine dput could be useful also
there (RHEL or RHEL-based server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032670
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
docker-registry-0.6.0-4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docker-registry-0.6.0-4.fc19
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032670
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
docker-registry-0.6.0-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docker-registry-0.6.0-4.el6
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032670
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
docker-registry-0.6.0-4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docker-registry-0.6.0-4.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031318
--- Comment #7 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
Thank you for comments!
Before I modify my package:
(In reply to Ken Dreyer from comment #6)
- The rabbirc command requires the net-irc Gem, and it will crash without it.
I'm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398
Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nalimi...@club.fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398
--- Comment #48 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi ---
No, I hadn't thought about it at all...
I believe we can't make the 64-bit interface the default, because this needs to
be taken care of in the user side as well.
Anyway, patches are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018546
--- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
I could request rebuilds with the new soname version, just to be sure.
Evaluating whether the dependencies would rebuild (with the new lib being
API-compatible) is a prerequisite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861498
Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1010003 (bigdata-review)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861498
Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003960
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003960
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008189
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008189
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
--- Comment #27 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #26)
Fixed.
---
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/libsodium.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/libsodium-0.4.5-2.fc21.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014738
Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014738
Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(bjoern.esser@gmai |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #4 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
The package has been tested on the dependence of java-1.7.0-openjdk, it is
not necessary for the functionality.
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?p=1679298postcount=14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
--- Comment #28 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Jose Pedro Oliveira from comment #27)
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #26)
Fixed.
---
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/libsodium.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #20 from Branislav Blaškovič bblas...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
http://blaskovic.fedorapeople.org/fedora-gooey-karma/fedora-gooey-karma.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
--- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991621
Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008189
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008189
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
varnish-agent-2.1-5.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/varnish-agent-2.1-5.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008189
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
varnish-agent-2.1-5.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/varnish-agent-2.1-5.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
--- Comment #32 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #28)
(In reply to Jose Pedro Oliveira from comment #27)
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #26)
Fixed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
--- Comment #33 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #32)
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #28)
(In reply to Jose Pedro Oliveira from comment #27)
(In reply to Christopher Meng
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||susi.leht...@iki.fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905304
Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||warl...@mit.edu
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
--- Comment #35 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #28)
(In reply to Jose Pedro Oliveira from comment #27)
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #26)
Fixed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861498
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861498
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861498
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031318
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
--- Comment #36 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt ---
Christopher,
Please do a proper specfile/SRPM update.
/jpo
PS - And don't forget to add this ticket number to the changelog entry.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003960
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003960
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
glite-lb-client-6.0.8-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-client-6.0.8-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003960
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
glite-lb-client-6.0.8-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-client-6.0.8-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003960
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
glite-lb-client-6.0.8-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-client-6.0.8-2.fc18
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003960
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
glite-lb-client-6.0.8-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-client-6.0.8-2.el6
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861498
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861498
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jdbi-2.49-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jdbi-2.49-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
--- Comment #16 from Pete MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com ---
Switched to manual xmvn build and install instead of macros to work around
system scope limitation:
SPEC URL: http://pmackinn.fedorapeople.org/datanucleus/datanucleus-core.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035661
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||496968 (DebugInfo)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035661
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.sky...@iki.fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
--- Comment #17 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
why this package as marked as noarch?
if the builder system is for e.g. x64 then the build deps [1] are in /usr/lib64
after in the pom file, are not available on x86 arch ...
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035661
--- Comment #24 from Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com ---
Thank you! Fxd.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/luajit.git/commit/?id=f05c145cb149f6aa507c7c6c30edd203316dd022
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
Pete MacKinnon pmack...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo+ |
--- Comment #19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003960
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008189
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861498
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
--- Comment #20 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Pete MacKinnon from comment #19)
The eclipse dependencies are marked as optional in maven. Thus, they do not
transfer arch requirements beyond the datanucleus-core package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011705
--- Comment #21 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
observed issues:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Apache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025977
--- Comment #16 from Michele Baldessari mich...@acksyn.org ---
Updated packages:
Spec URL: http://acksyn.org/files/rpms/captcp/captcp.spec
SRPM URL: http://acksyn.org/files/rpms/captcp/captcp-1.7-2.fc20.src.rpm
- Fixed Licensing tag after
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025977
Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mizde...@redhat.com |sso...@redhat.com
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025977
Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025977
--- Comment #17 from Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com ---
Looks good to me!
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025977
Simo Sorce sso...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991624
Will Benton wi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877096
--- Comment #26 from John Heidemann jo...@isi.edu ---
Created attachment 834601
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=834601action=edit
updated perl-Fsdb.spec wrt comment 23 to comment 25
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974852
Andy Lutomirski l...@mit.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@mit.edu
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991621
Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991621
Will Benton wi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036462
--- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
I am not sure why fonts-b...@lists.fedoraproject.org got removed from cc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974852
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Andy Lutomirski from comment #4)
I'd like to take this over. I need a sponsor.
Spec URL: http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/fish.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974852
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039814
Bug ID: 1039814
Summary: Review Request: criu (crtools) - Tool for
Checkpoint/Restore in User-space
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039814
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039814
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Vagin ava...@gmail.com ---
As far as I know Adrian doesn't have objections against these changes. I talked
with him about this one week ago. He doesn't have time to do it himself. Adrian
is in CC.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039818
Bug ID: 1039818
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-wikicloth - Mediawiki parser
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798891
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mfab...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798891
--- Comment #11 from Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com ---
Sure, please.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798891
--- Comment #12 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com ---
Thanks Daiki :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035661
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999366
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|se-sandbox-runner-1.3.3-2.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025368
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-jira-0.13-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819687
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025368
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-jira-0.13-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999366
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|se-sandbox-runner-1.3.4-1.f
85 matches
Mail list logo