https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288645
Dmitry Mikhirev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846
--- Comment #22 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to mreynolds from comment #21)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #20)
> >
> > See line #481.
>
> Ah, I had python-krbV listed in my setup.py file. Do I need
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269844
--- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski ---
CubeReader is a GUI application so you need to require java, not java headless.
Also, you need to install a wrapper script to run the application, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277505
--- Comment #15 from gil cattaneo ---
Other trick
Remove
BuildRequires:jpackage-utils
BuildRequires:maven-local
Requires:java-headless
Requires:jpackage-utils
and add
BuildRequires:javapackages-local
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288610
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-lazy-object-proxy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159220
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270355
--- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
I've added /usr/x86_64-nacl ownership.
I think chromium broke on the softlinks. Would rather just keep it as is, where
I know it works.
This toolchain (nacl-binutils,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281532
--- Comment #24 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
praiskup's scratch build of example-0.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for f23 failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12057711
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288610
--- Comment #5 from Brian Lane ---
Spec URL:
https://bcl.fedorapeople.org/python-lazy-object-proxy/python-lazy-object-proxy.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285471
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-spdx-exceptions
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144865
--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
pbrobinson's scratch build of
glite-lb-client?#ab3f7850e46d640d3844321d6a0bdde00e9d34f0 for
epel7-archbootstrap and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144865
--- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
pbrobinson's scratch build of
glite-lb-common?#15e85324e0a340ac46100a3ae2af1c3572693837 for
epel7-archbootstrap and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283190
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-is-my-json-valid-2.12.3-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190735
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284155
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
python-rpdb-0.1.5-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
python-alembic-0.8.3-3.fc22, python-editor-0.4-4.fc22 has been pushed to the
Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110070
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157179
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131019
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286001
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286006
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284945
--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith ---
Not sure why it's failing for you in mock -- I've run it multiple times in mock
myself (against rawhide), and it's running perfectly fine. Mind trying again?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269844
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159687
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277505
--- Comment #13 from Damian Wrobel ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #10)
> instead of maven-local you should use javapackages-local
>
Gil, thanks for your hints, I started to look at them and compare
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159691
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279786
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279786
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
python-dbf-0.96.005-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4a867ad4e4
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281532
Pavel Raiskup changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159688
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277505
--- Comment #16 from gil cattaneo ---
Damian javapackages-tools-doc package provides
https://fedorahosted.org/released/javapackages/doc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281532
--- Comment #25 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
praiskup's scratch build of example-0.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for f23 failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12058344
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284255
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288453
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
The point of the -doc subpackage is to avoid duplication to save disk space. It
also saves user confusion, because the don't have to look at python2-*-doc
first, and then
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268083
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185665
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282893
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282640
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181317
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Hm, I lost track of this ticket. I can review it, but there are some things to
fix:
Python packaging guidelines have been nicely simplified. You should now use
%py2_build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179484
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240116
--- Comment #22 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
zbyszek's scratch build of python-music21-2.1.2-2.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide
completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287794
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287794
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
archaius-0.7.3-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3ae4cc39c5
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240116
--- Comment #21 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Thanks for taking on the review!
(In reply to William Moreno from comment #20)
> Package Review
> ==
>
> 1. The doc and common subpackage both ship the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188
--- Comment #26 from Andrew Morton ---
Wrapping up my end of things...
Andy confirmed that my gnubby key is an old one which doesn't fully implement
the U2F HID spec. Here's his fix (which worked for me) (thanks)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288100
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
console-image-viewer-1.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-11f979ec71
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288100
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
console-image-viewer-1.2-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-cb16dbf919
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264546
--- Comment #52 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
glchaves's scratch build of soletta-0.0.1-beta13.1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
failed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288610
David Shea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ds...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287435
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279786
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288610
--- Comment #2 from Brian Lane ---
(In reply to David Shea from comment #1)
> fedora-review is taking its sweet time, so a couple of comments while that's
> running:
>
> - might as well just remove %check. The tests aren't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264546
--- Comment #53 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
glchaves's scratch build of soletta-0.0.1-beta13.1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287435
--- Comment #4 from Randy Barlow ---
I have built release 1 for Rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12055294
I intend to release release 1 on F23, and I'll update release 2 on Rawhide to
include
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287435
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
vagrant-hostmanager-1.6.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-146e85b73e
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846
mreyno...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846
--- Comment #19 from mreyno...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #18)
> > >
> > > Also, tests are not run:
> > >
> > > > Ran 0 tests in 0.000s
> >
> > I'm not sure what this is. I do not see this in my rpmbuild or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846
--- Comment #20 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to mreynolds from comment #19)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #18)
>
> > > >
> > > > Also, tests are not run:
> > > >
> > > > > Ran 0 tests in 0.000s
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288610
--- Comment #1 from David Shea ---
fedora-review is taking its sweet time, so a couple of comments while that's
running:
- might as well just remove %check. The tests aren't hooked up via setup.py,
and actually running them
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266429
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jdulaney's scratch build of cmark-0.22.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12055569
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270382
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-on-headers-1.0.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270385
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284155
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270385
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-unpipe-1.0.0-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271802
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-boolbase-1.0.0-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271795
Bug 1271795 depends on bug 1271802, which changed state.
Bug 1271802 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-boolbase - Two functions: One that
returns true, one that returns false
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271802
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271802
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288610
David Shea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287820
John Dulaney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288453
--- Comment #2 from Julien Enselme ---
SPEC: http://dl.jujens.eu/SPECS/python-CommonMark.spec
SRPM: http://dl.jujens.eu/SRPMS/python-CommonMark-0.5.4-2.fc23.src.rpm
* Fri Dec 4 2015 Julien Enselme -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267009
John Dulaney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264546
--- Comment #54 from Gustavo Lima Chaves ---
New spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/solettaproject/soletta-packaging/v9/rpm/soletta.spec
New SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287820
John Dulaney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283190
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-is-my-json-valid-2.12.3-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284155
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
python-rpdb-0.1.5-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
python-alembic-0.8.3-3.fc23, python-editor-0.4-4.fc23 has been pushed to the
Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283190
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Bug 1258182 depends on bug 1258166, which changed state.
Bug 1258166 Summary: Please remove macros.golang from golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258166
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270382
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269813
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269813
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go-2.2.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272248
Bug 1272248 depends on bug 1269813, which changed state.
Bug 1269813 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go - Golang
implementation of JSON Web Tokens (JWT)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269813
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274738
Bug 1274738 depends on bug 1271802, which changed state.
Bug 1271802 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-boolbase - Two functions: One that
returns true, one that returns false
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271802
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159226
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162011
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159703
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159223
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159220
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159217
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159220
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159687
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159691
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162000
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157298
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
201 - 300 of 302 matches
Mail list logo