https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935255
--- Comment #12 from Karolina Surma ---
All looks good to me. The package can be APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936772
Bug ID: 1936772
Summary: Review Request: sixel - Encoder and decoder for DEC
Sixel
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936414
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936055
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Remi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851463
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919606
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1920675
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936727
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1694168
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936728
Rich Mattes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1694168
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936728
Bug ID: 1936728
Summary: Review Request: ignition-fuel-tools - C++ client
library and CLI tools for interacting with Ignition
Fuel servers
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936727
Bug ID: 1936727
Summary: Review Request: ignition-common - AV, Graphics,
Events, and much more
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928969
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936715
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1936714
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936714
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1936708
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936713
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1936714
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936715
Bug ID: 1936715
Summary: Review Request: rust-diffus-derive - Finds the
difference between two instances of any data structure
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936715
--- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=63383516
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936714
Bug ID: 1936714
Summary: Review Request: rust-diffus - Finds the difference
between two instances of any data structure
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Package Review has canceled Package
Review 's request for Dylan
Stephano-Shachter 's needinfo:
Bug 1723575: Review Request: python-insights-core - data collection and
processing framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936713
--- Comment #1 from Fabio Valentini ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=63383395
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936713
Bug ID: 1936713
Summary: Review Request: rust-snake_case - String-like type
that can only contain valid non-empty snake_case
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934396
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934395
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934394
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934393
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934392
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934391
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934390
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934389
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934387
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934386
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934385
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934383
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934384
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934382
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932760
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-16525d15e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925322
ericedens changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ericedens@google. |
|com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919712
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-b0b8a01fbe has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919712
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-6babac6a50 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919712
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936138
Antonio T. sagitter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1913737
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-450431ab2b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-450431ab2b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1913737
Bug 1913737 depends on bug 1744725, which changed state.
Bug 1744725 Summary: Lutris package ready for EPEL 8 need cabextract
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744725
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936138
--- Comment #3 from c...@musicinmybrain.net ---
Actually, I guess that
%global distprefix %{nil}
before %forgemeta should prevent the snapshot versioning too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936138
--- Comment #2 from c...@musicinmybrain.net ---
> - Just a comment about versioning.
> Have the rpms a "snapshots" form of versioning?
>
> (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_snapshots)
Yes, when you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933988
--- Comment #20 from c...@musicinmybrain.net ---
The idea of a -filesystem package is that, when all you need is the directory
to store files in “in case they are needed,” you can depend on the -filesystem
package instead of pulling in another
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912856
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936138
--- Comment #1 from Antonio T. sagitter ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
- Just a comment about versioning.
Have the rpms a "snapshots"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936494
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932728
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
--- Comment #6 from Aleksei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933988
--- Comment #19 from Antonio T. sagitter ---
(In reply to code from comment #17)
> I’m not sure that requiring all of CMake from -devel to own the directory is
> the right approach. Is the goal to support EPEL7, where this package is not
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932728
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932728
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(alebastr89@gmail. |
|com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936138
Antonio T. sagitter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925940
--- Comment #1 from Terje Røsten ---
Update:
0.1.4
Fix Python provide for Fedora 32.
spec: https://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-cwcwidth/python-cwcwidth.spec
srpm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731
--- Comment #66 from Mattia Verga ---
*** Bug 1020292 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925322
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(ericedens@google.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931054
--- Comment #7 from Terje Røsten ---
Thanks!
SCM request sent:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32642
Could you please consider to have a look at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925940
too? I think it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936494
--- Comment #4 from Artem ---
Great. Thanks.
New spec and srpm:
https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/fuzzel.spec
https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/fuzzel-1.5.1-2.fc34.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919712
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-c8a929affd has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-c8a929affd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932728
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(alebastr89@gmail.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932728
--- Comment #2 from Davide Cavalca ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- systemd_user_post is invoked in %post and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936494
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919712
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-b0b8a01fbe has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b0b8a01fbe
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922166
sorensen...@tuta.io changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869109
sorensen...@tuta.io changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932728
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1935923
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932728
Davide Cavalca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcava...@fb.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919712
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-6babac6a50 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6babac6a50
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929992
Lumír Balhar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lbal...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919712
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912585
--- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks!
$ fedpkg request-repo golang-github-insomniacslk-xjson 1912585
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32641
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936055
Gwyn Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936055
Gwyn Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936055
Gwyn Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gw...@protonmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922315
Ben Cotton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #5 from Ben Cotton ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934194
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-23c3fbaa92 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925761
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-d2cfe9bac0 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936494
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alebast...@gmail.com
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935650
--- Comment #10 from Jarek Prokop ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #9)
> I just wonder, do we really need this package? As far as I understand, this
> is required to satisfy Cucumber test requirements. I realize this can be
> also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936494
--- Comment #1 from Artem ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=63350773
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936494
Bug ID: 1936494
Summary: Review Request: fuzzel - Application launcher for
wlroots based Wayland compositors
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910504
c...@musicinmybrain.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(timothee.floure@p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936425
Tomáš Hrnčiar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936414
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vasc...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936414
alexfa...@yandex.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919606
Ben Cotton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bcot...@redhat.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922315
Ben Cotton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bcot...@redhat.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922315
--- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
- Is there any need for the static subpackage? We shouldn't ship static libs
without strong reason, e.g. from the packaging guidelines [1]:
"In general, packagers SHOULD NOT ship static libraries."
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933988
c...@musicinmybrain.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936425
Tomáš Hrnčiar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936425
Karolina Surma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936425
Karolina Surma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|thrnc...@redhat.com
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935255
--- Comment #11 from Tomáš Hrnčiar ---
Apologies, disregard previous links. I made a couple of minor changes.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936425
Bug ID: 1936425
Summary: Review Request: python-docs-theme - theme for Python
documentation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922315
--- Comment #3 from Gabriel Gaspar Becker ---
Fedora 35 (rawhide) scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=63328734
Requests:
1) Please add comment explaining why this package has to use a specific commit
hash
2)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935255
--- Comment #10 from Tomáš Hrnčiar ---
Hello Karolina, here is the updated spec file, thank you.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936414
Bug ID: 1936414
Summary: Review Request: cotila - Compile-time Linear Algebra
Header only library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917075
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935255
--- Comment #9 from Miro Hrončok ---
> I always struggle to use the correct GitHub URL's when working with archives.
The URLs that work are:
https://github.com///archive/.zip
https://github.com///archive/.tar.gz
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo