https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|fedora-gooey-karma-0.1-4.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #32 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com ---
We should probably write up gooey-karma in the appropriate places on the wiki,
just like easy-karma...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
fedora-gooey-karma-0.1-4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-gooey-karma-0.1-4.fc19
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
fedora-gooey-karma-0.1-4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-gooey-karma-0.1-4.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Branislav Blaskovic branis...@blaskovic.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #23 from Branislav Blaškovič bblas...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
http://blaskovic.fedorapeople.org/fedora-gooey-karma/fedora-gooey-karma.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(msu...@redhat.com |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Branislav Blaškovič bblas...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #20 from Branislav Blaškovič bblas...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
http://blaskovic.fedorapeople.org/fedora-gooey-karma/fedora-gooey-karma.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #19 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com ---
Can you please post link to your latest SPEC and SRC.RPM? Oh, I see you are
still updating the same files. Please do not do that. Every change - even if it
is just your own and it does
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msu...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #17 from Branislav Blaškovič bblas...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Terje Røsten from comment #15)
Thanks for improvements, if you could post urls to your updated spec, srpm
and do a koji scratch build it would help a lot :-)
It
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #15 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no ---
Thanks for improvements, if you could post urls to your updated spec, srpm
and do a koji scratch build it would help a lot :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
File at Spec URL differs from spec file in src.rpm at SRPM URL. The %doc
line is different.
If you kept those two lines in the review ticket up-to-date, it would become
convenient
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #14 from Branislav Blaškovič bblas...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 816073
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=816073action=edit
Icon mockup
fedora-gooey-karma has icon!
I've asked Máirín Duffy for them and she
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #13 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com ---
branislav: I think it's fine to skip the man pages, and the other two steps
would be nice but probably don't block the review. We should probably try and
find you a sponsor.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #11 from Branislav Blaškovič bblas...@redhat.com ---
I might change the Source0 to
https://github.com/blaskovic/fedora-gooey-karma/archive/%{name}-%{version}.
tar.gz , as that's what the file is actually called once it gets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #12 from Branislav Blaškovič bblas...@redhat.com ---
TODO:
- Man pages for binary? (man fedora-gooey-karma)
- Graphical icon?
- Summary improve.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Branislav Blaškovič bblas...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com ---
First thing I see, no check on the .desktop file is run:
It is not simply enough to just include the .desktop file in the package, one
MUST run desktop-file-install (in %install) OR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #2 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com ---
You can drop the Buildroot:
Fedora (as of F-10) does not require the presence of the BuildRoot tag in the
spec and if one is defined it will be ignored. The provided buildroot will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #3 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com ---
The provided .src.rpm doesn't seem to have been built from the provided .spec:
its Source0 is http://blaskovic.fedorapeople.org/fedora-gooey-karma/0.1.tar.gz
, which doesn't match the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #4 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com ---
The source tree clearly specifies the license to be GPLv3+, but the License:
tag in the spec file states GPLv2+ .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #5 from Branislav Blaškovič bblas...@redhat.com ---
Thank you for review!
(In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #1)
First thing I see, no check on the .desktop file is run:
Added.
(In reply to Adam Williamson from comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com ---
I might change the Source0 to
https://github.com/blaskovic/fedora-gooey-karma/archive/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
, as that's what the file is actually called once it gets through
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #7 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com ---
Why is the .desktop file marked OnlyShowIn=GNOME; ? Is there some reason it
won't work on other desktops?
The app not having an icon is kinda bad, you could ask if the art team could
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|awill...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020839
--- Comment #9 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com ---
Going through the review process, consider all 'MUST' and 'SHOULD' elements as
OK unless posted here...
rpmlint output:
[adamw@vaioz noarch]$ rpmlint
37 matches
Mail list logo
