https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #17 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Unfortunately, the upcoming 0.4 version of Julia does not work with 3.4, in
which MCJIT was introduced and wasn't very stable IIUC. Upstream is not very
keen on continuing to support five different
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #13)
> You can't see llvm34? (comment 11)
Ugh, that should have read "You can't *use* llvm34?"
(Since you mentioned that version in version 11.)
(In reply to Mil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #15 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Actually, I already have an llvm3.3 package ready for a long time, which I can
rename to llvm33. I was more asking for your opinion about having another
versioned-LLVM package in Fedora, since anywa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen ---
> Once you have llvm34.spec it should be pretty trivial to tweak it to llvm33.
> You can give it a try locally first. :)
Assuming you don't need clang?
> (I still vote for calling this llvm33;)
> Are th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen ---
(In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #12)
> The Haskell compiler has done the same recently with LLVM 3.4, for the very
> same reason:
Yeah I we probably need llvm35 too for ghc-7.10
> Jens, Mu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #12 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
I'd like to raise this issue again. Julia has been FTBFS for several weeks in
Rawhide because of the update to LLVM 3.6. Clearly the current strategy isn't
viable if we want a working Julia in Fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
Milan Bouchet-Valat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
Milan Bouchet-Valat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #10 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
As I said in the description:
> This package is just a modification of the llvm package version 3.3 which was
> > included in F20. All paths have been changed to include the version, so that
> they
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #9 from Neal Becker ---
Makes it hard to build julia. Is there a julia build f20 x86_64 available for
me to try?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||or...@cora.nwra.com
--- Comment #8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
Neal Becker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ndbeck...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #6 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
> (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> > > Per your strategy, will there come llvm3.4,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #3)
> (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> > Per your strategy, will there come llvm3.4, llvm3.5 in the future? Because
> > LLVM API is never st
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #4 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Bump!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #3 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> Per your strategy, will there come llvm3.4, llvm3.5 in the future? Because
> LLVM API is never stable.
Well, it really depends on how Fedora's and Jul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen ---
Does Julia upstream have any plans to move to llvm-3.4 btw?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng ---
Per your strategy, will there come llvm3.4, llvm3.5 in the future? Because LLVM
API is never stable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
Milan Bouchet-Valat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1040517
Referenced Bugs:
http
19 matches
Mail list logo
