https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
Martin Perina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
Piotr Kliczewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mper...@redhat.com
Flag
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Piotr Kliczewski has canceled Package Review
's request for Piotr Kliczewski
's needinfo:
Bug 1149176: Review Request: vdsm-jsonrpc-java - jsonrpc communication lib for
ovirt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
automat...@ovirt.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||oVirt gerrit 63673
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
--- Comment #19 from Piotr Kliczewski ---
Michael thank you for your feedback. Will follow your suggestions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
--- Comment #18 from Michael Simacek ---
Looks much better now.
Issues I found so far:
- There are missing BuildRequires, so the package doesn't build in mock. Most
notably "maven-local" package which provides mvn_build. For other maven
depen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
--- Comment #17 from Piotr Kliczewski ---
I removed old spec and srpm and uploaded updated schema and newly created srpm:
Spec URL: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByDkUDLXsT0YYTZqTGc2YTJnSDQ
To download: wget --no-check-certificate
'https:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
--- Comment #16 from Michael Simacek ---
Great.
Most of the links to relevant documentation are available in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
Java packaging HowTo is available at
https://fedora-java.gith
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
--- Comment #15 from Piotr Kliczewski ---
Will do that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
--- Comment #14 from Michael Simacek ---
I only see the comment saying that you updated it, but not the updated
specfile.
I'd like to note that while Fedora and RHEL based products use RPM specfiles,
their usage and guidelines can differ a lo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
Piotr Kliczewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(pkliczew@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(pkliczew@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
--- Comment #11 from Piotr Kliczewski ---
The spec was updated long time ago and still waiting on review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
Douglas Schilling Landgraf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|dougsl...@redhat.com|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
Douglas Schilling Landgraf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dougsl...@redhat.com
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
--- Comment #9 from Piotr Kliczewski ---
(In reply to Douglas Schilling Landgraf from comment #6)
> Hi Piotr,
>
> I see you updated the package. Let's start with the below, please also
> consider the previous comments.
>
> - Point the spec a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
--- Comment #8 from Piotr Kliczewski ---
El6 is supported as well and we build it every time there is change in the code
within this package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
--- Comment #7 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf ---
Also, please also double check if vdsm-jsonrpc-java spec should keep the EL6
support, looks like the current vdsm only supports EL7 in current days.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
--- Comment #6 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf ---
Hi Piotr,
I see you updated the package. Let's start with the below, please also consider
the previous comments.
- Point the spec and srpm to a different url, so it can easily downloaded by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
--- Comment #5 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf ---
Hi Piotr,
As mentioned in comment#3 it's recommended to provide the spec and sprm in it
can be downloaded directly with tools like wget. The Source is pointing to
Version 1.0.8 which is not a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mizde...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msima...@redha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Blocks|201449 (F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
Piotr Kliczewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(pkliczew@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msima...@redhat.com
Flag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
Referenced Bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
28 matches
Mail list logo
