https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
Susi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|505154 (FE-SCITECH) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
Dave Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #29 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/hypre
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #28 from Dave Love ---
Thanks. Yes, I should have commented on the patches.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #27 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #26 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #25)
> (In reply to Dave Love from comment #24)
> > In what circumstances are the tests not performed? I see them run.
>
> On fedora rawhide i386:
>
> + ./runtest.s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #25 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #24)
> In what circumstances are the tests not performed? I see them run.
On fedora rawhide i386:
+ ./runtest.sh TEST_ij/agg_interp.sh TEST_ij/coarsening.sh TEST_ij
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #24 from Dave Love ---
In what circumstances are the tests not performed? I see them run.
What's one supposed to do about s390? None of the MPI packages I've seen, nor
the MPI packaging guide, mention it, and I don't know of any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #23 from Antonio Trande ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Tests are not performed.
- No OpenMPI on s390x ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #22 from Dave Love ---
Shortly after posting that I noticed what the problem probably was
(conditionals for openblas) and have tried another build. I'll upload a new
version later if that works.
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #21 from Dave Love ---
I now have packaging of the current version buildable x86_64, and against which
I can build PETSc. A scratch build on koji has failed on arm, at least, but I
can't access the logs either via the web site or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #20 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #18)
> Hi Dave,
>
> please update to latest release.
I'll have to check whether it works with the PETSc package, which was the main
reason for wanting hypre, but 2.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #19 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Oops, sorry, I missed your answer, until Antonio added his comment. I'll reply
anyway, even though he's taking the review.
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #17)
> (In reply to Zbigniew J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #17 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #16)
> Use %autosetup please with so many patches.
Than I wouldn't be able to use it on the platform I care about (el6).
> A single Requires/Provides pe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #15 from Dave Love ---
This is the current upstream version, which should work with the current petsci
(work in progress):
Spec URL: https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/hypre.spec
SRPM URL: https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #13 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
loveshack's scratch build of hypre-2.10.1-1.el6.src.rpm for f23-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12021656
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #12 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to José Matos from comment #11)
> I am interested in reviewing hypre but the srpm is not available.
>
> Coud you, please, fix this? :-)
Oh dear; I hadn't seen this, sorry. I've missed a number of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jama...@fc.up.pt
--- Comment #11 from Jo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
Dave Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #10 from Dave Love ---
Bother. That should have been
SRPM: https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/hypre-2.8.0b-16.el6.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #9 from Dave Love ---
I made some updates, particularly to survive el6 and rawhide scratch builds,
not just copr.
SRPM: https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/hypre-2.8.0b-15.el6.src.rpm
Scratch builds:
http://koji.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #8 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) from comment #7)
> > In %files section, %defattr is not needed unless you are changing default
> > permission
>
> Explained here:
> https://fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
---
> This is not mentioned on fedora packaging guideline wiki but I got
> this feedback for my package from package reviewer
There is absolutely no technical reason to sp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #6 from Sinny Kumari ---
This is un-official review of the package
Hi,
Comments mentioned by me were suggestions not a blocker, they are not mandatory
to follow.
> > * In BuildRequires section, it is preferred to write each buil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #5 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Sinny Kumari from comment #4)
> This is un-official review of the package
>
> Few suggestions in spec file:
> * In BuildRequires section, it is preferred to write each build require
> package in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
Sinny Kumari changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ksi...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #3 from Dave Love ---
The internal superlu needed disabling. New source
https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/hypre-2.8.0b-15.el6.src.rpm
and copr
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/loveshack/livhpc/build/65601/
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #2 from Dave Love ---
I don't know where they went, but they're back now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
Dave Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR),
32 matches
Mail list logo
