https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
geoipupdate-2.2.1-2.el5, GeoIP-GeoLite-data-2015.04-2.el5, GeoIP-1.6.5-2.el5
has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still
persist, please
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
geoipupdate-2.2.1-2.el6, GeoIP-1.6.5-1.el6, GeoIP-GeoLite-data-2015.04-2.el6
has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still
persist, please
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
GeoIP-GeoLite-data-2015.04-1.fc20, geoipupdate-2.2.1-2.fc20, GeoIP-1.6.5-1.fc20
has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
GeoIP-GeoLite-data-2015.04-1.fc21, geoipupdate-2.2.1-2.fc21, GeoIP-1.6.5-1.fc21
has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
GeoIP-GeoLite-data-2015.04-1.fc22, geoipupdate-2.2.1-2.fc22, GeoIP-1.6.5-1.fc22
has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
GeoIP-GeoLite-data-2015.04-1.fc21,geoipupdate-2.2.1-2.fc21,GeoIP-1.6.5-1.fc21
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
GeoIP-GeoLite-data-2015.04-1.fc22,geoipupdate-2.2.1-2.fc22,GeoIP-1.6.5-1.fc22
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
GeoIP-GeoLite-data-2015.04-1.el6,geoipupdate-2.2.1-2.el6,GeoIP-1.6.5-1.el6 has
been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
GeoIP-GeoLite-data-2015.04-1.el5,geoipupdate-2.2.1-2.el5,GeoIP-1.6.5-1.el5 has
been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
GeoIP-GeoLite-data-2015.04-1.fc20,geoipupdate-2.2.1-2.fc20,GeoIP-1.6.5-1.fc20
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #41 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
EL-7 ships with GeoIP 1.5.0, which bundles geoipudate. This package would
therefore conflict with the EL-7 package if we built it for EPEL-7.
So unless something very unusual happens, I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #33 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
OK, I've had time to look at this today and here are my thoughts.
Firstly, the big change between GeoIP 1.5.x and GeoIP 1.6.x+geoipupdate is that
there is no libGeoIPUpdate any more. I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #28 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
You can't have noarch sub-packages with %{_isa}-based dependencies, as a noarch
package is not arch-specific.
I'm glad it failed though, because I think the IPv6 updates/cron issue needs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #29 from Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com ---
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #28)
You can't have noarch sub-packages with %{_isa}-based dependencies, as a
noarch package is not arch-specific.
Wasn't point
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #30 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
Requires:%{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}, crontabs(In reply to
Philip Prindeville from comment #29)
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #28)
You can't have noarch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #31 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
(In reply to Philip Prindeville from comment #29)
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #28)
You can't have noarch sub-packages with %{_isa}-based dependencies, as a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #32 from Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #31)
(In reply to Philip Prindeville from comment #29)
Wasn't point of comment #13 that the %{?_isa} was
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #26 from Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com ---
After an initial commit, I was building master and saw this. Is there a
problem with the state of one of the build servers?
$ fedpkg build
Building
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #27 from Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com ---
Seeing it for PPC on el6 builds as well:
$ fedpkg build
Building geoipupdate-2.1.0-1.el6 for el6-candidate
Created task: 8789907
Task info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #23 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
You can always release an update of GeoIP in F21 which Requires
geoipupdate-cron, and together with it, geoipupdate-cron which
Provides/Obsoletes GeoIP-update (like in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #24 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
I think this package should include a geoipupdate-cron6 package, like the
GeoIP-update6 package in current Fedora releases. Then we can have the
cron/cron6 packages obsolete/provide the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #14 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
(In reply to Philip Prindeville from comment #12)
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #11)
Yes, this should be:
Provides: GeoIP-update = 1.6.0
Obsoletes: GeoIP-update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: geoipupdate |Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #15 from Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #13)
- Add %config(noreplace) to the cron tab file.
- Add Requires: crontabs.
Done.
= MUST items =
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #17 from Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #16)
Please remove the extension from the man pages in %files:
%{_mandir}/man1/geoipupdate.1.*
etc. This
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #18 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
What I meant to say, I now see that this wasn't very clear, was that this
*version* with the specific Provides and Obsoletes works in F22. In F21 they
might need
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #20 from Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com ---
Oh, and I pushed a new .spec, etc. to fedorapeople.org with the migrated
Provides: and Obsoletes: as you suggested changing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #19 from Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #18)
BTW, I found a problem with the Provides and Obsoletes:
Provides: GeoIP-update = 1.6.0
Obsoletes:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #22 from Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #21)
Oh, I didn't notice that you're the co-maintainer. Sorry.
No worries.
You could play with Provides and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
--- Comment #21 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Oh, I didn't notice that you're the co-maintainer. Sorry.
You could play with Provides and Obsoletes and join updates of GeoIP and
geoipupdate, but is it worth the
38 matches
Mail list logo
