https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889



--- Comment #14 from Paul Howarth <p...@city-fan.org> ---
(In reply to Philip Prindeville from comment #12)
> (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #11)
> 
> > Yes, this should be:
> > 
> > Provides: GeoIP-update = 1.6.0
> > Obsoletes: GeoIP-update < 1.6.0
> > 
> > You could arguably use %{version} in the Provides: line but I think it's
> > safer to stick with 1.6.0 as geoipupdate looks to have a different numbering
> > scheme to GeoIP.
> 
> Fixed.

We must make sure that anyone updating from GeoIP 1.5.x to 1.6.x gets the GeoIP
+ geoipupdate combination, as must anyone with GeoIP updating from F-21 to
F-22. People doing fresh installs on F-22 can install the two packages
independently. It can be tricky to get the provides/obsoletes/requires correct
for all of these cases, so they should be tested.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to