[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

2015-12-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 --- Comment #17 from mreyno...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #15) > Created attachment 1102297 [details] > simplify topdir usage in spec file > > > %setup -qc > > mv %{name}-%{version}-1 src_root > > > %build > >

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

2015-12-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 --- Comment #14 from mreyno...@redhat.com --- > Command for testing considers downloading of 'python-krbV' that is already > provided in Fedora. 'setup.py' must use that one in Fedora. I will remove the requirement for python-krbV > > +

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

2015-12-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 --- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt --- Created attachment 1102297 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1102297=edit simplify topdir usage in spec file > %setup -qc > mv %{name}-%{version}-1 src_root >

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

2015-12-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 --- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt --- Btw, all Python modules in Fedora's package collection are named python-foo, following the %parent-%child naming guidelines for Python add-ons:

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 --- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to mreynolds from comment #2) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1) > > >%{!?__python2: %global __python2 %__python} > > >%{!?python2_sitelib: %global

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 --- Comment #5 from mreyno...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #4) > (In reply to mreynolds from comment #2) > > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1) > > > >%{!?__python2: %global __python2 %__python} > > >

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 --- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to mreynolds from comment #5) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #4) > > (In reply to mreynolds from comment #2) > > > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 --- Comment #7 from mreyno...@redhat.com --- > > > > Why? Please explain. Since "release" gets %{?dist} I can not reuse > > "release" for the source code version/layout. Using "prerel", or some other > > variable, would make future

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 --- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to mreynolds from comment #7) > > > > > > Why? Please explain. Since "release" gets %{?dist} I can not reuse > > > "release" for the source code version/layout. Using

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 --- Comment #9 from mreyno...@redhat.com --- Upstream ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48358 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 --- Comment #10 from mreyno...@redhat.com --- Updated spec and srpm have been updated. Thanks, Mark -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 --- Comment #13 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to mreynolds from comment #12) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11) > > (In reply to mreynolds from comment #10) > > > Updated spec and srpm have been

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 --- Comment #11 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to mreynolds from comment #10) > Updated spec and srpm have been updated. > > Thanks, > Mark Your package cannot be built without the packages required for building.

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

2015-12-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 --- Comment #12 from mreyno...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11) > (In reply to mreynolds from comment #10) > > Updated spec and srpm have been updated. > > > > Thanks, > > Mark > > Your package cannot be built

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

2015-12-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 mreyno...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)

[Bug 1287846] Review Request: lib389 - python module to access the 389 DIrectory Server

2015-12-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287846 --- Comment #3 from mreyno...@redhat.com --- $ rpmlint ./lib389-1.0.1-1.fc22.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ./lib389-1.0.1-1.fc22.src.rpm lib389.src: W: file-size-mismatch