Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System
2011-03-05 22:40:45 EST ---
knights-2.2.0-4.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 sta
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System
2011-03-05 18:02:47 EST ---
knights-2.2.0-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 sta
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System
2011-03-05 17:56:58 EST ---
knights-2.2.0-4.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 sta
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System
2011-02-15 15:43:28 EST ---
knights-2.2.0-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System
2011-02-15 15:41:34 EST ---
knights-2.2.0-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System
2011-02-15 15:39:18 EST ---
knights-2.2.0-4.fc15 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
Julian Aloofi changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-15 14:24:12 EST
---
I also added an f15 branch.
Git done (by process-git-requests)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
Julian Aloofi changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #16 from Julian Aloofi 2011-02-13
14:51:47 EST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> All right, no further objections.
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
Golo Fuchert changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #14 from Golo Fuchert 2011-02-13 05:44:08 EST
---
All right, no further objections.
Package APPRO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #13 from Julian Aloofi 2011-02-12
20:00:36 EST ---
Here are the new packages with fixed .desktop file permissions:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #12 from Golo Fuchert 2011-02-09 17:22:36 EST
---
Julian,
the package is almost ready, only the permissions for on
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #11 from Martin Gieseking 2011-02-08
02:06:09 EST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> "GPLv2 and GPLv3" with a comment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #10 from Julian Aloofi 2011-02-07
18:00:10 EST ---
I got a reply from Fedora legal, and the appropriate License wou
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #9 from Golo Fuchert 2011-02-07 15:16:33 EST
---
I agree with Martin on this. I think this should be clarified, esp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #8 from Julian Aloofi 2011-02-07
14:54:24 EST ---
I'll send them a mail now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking 2011-02-07
14:42:38 EST ---
To my limited legal knowledge, GPLv2+ is not quite correct her
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #6 from Julian Aloofi 2011-02-07
14:10:06 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I'd say the license is "GPLv2 or GPLv3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #4 from Julian Aloofi 2011-02-07
09:09:27 EST ---
> > - The headers of the source files state:
> > "GNU General P
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #3 from Julian Aloofi 2011-02-07
07:50:22 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Here are some initial comments/questio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
--- Comment #2 from Golo Fuchert 2011-02-06 18:09:35 EST
---
Here are some initial comments/questions before the review.
- I t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674180
Golo Fuchert changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
28 matches
Mail list logo
