[PacketFence-users] Captive Portal Issues v10.0.1

2020-06-04 Thread Ryan Radschlag via PacketFence-users
We're having issues with the clients not getting redirected to the captive portal. From what I can find, all of the DNS requests return 192.0.2.1 now. Is this supposed to work? Our clients sit idle and cant get to the portal even if we manually enter the dns or ip address. Currently we're runnin

Re: [PacketFence-users] Captive Portal Issues v10.0.1

2020-06-04 Thread Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
If it's a layer 2 registration network then the dns will answer with the ip 192.0.2.1 (to fix the samsung captive portal detection) So check to see if the ip is on the lo interface (ip a), if it's the case check to see if the haproxy-portal is listening on this ip (netstat -nlp| grep 443) Al

Re: [PacketFence-users] Captive Portal Issues v10.0.1

2020-06-05 Thread Ryan Radschlag via PacketFence-users
Looks like the ip is assigned: 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet 192.0.2.1/32 scope link lo valid_l

Re: [PacketFence-users] Captive Portal Issues v10.0.1

2020-06-05 Thread Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
Hum weird, when you try to ping 192.0.2.1 from your device can you see the request on the registration interface ? It's sounds to me that you have something local on your device that route 192.168.2.1 somewhere, can you verify the routing table ? Regards Fabrice Le 20-06-05 à 12 h 01, Ryan