;
Subject: RE: [PacketFence-users] VLAN Enforcement with MAC address
authentication
Hello Thapeli,
According to radius.log, it looks like you have a SSL issue.
Your node needs to have CA certificate that signed PacketFence RADIUS
certificate in its certificate store or directly PacketFe
Hello Thapeli,
According to radius.log, it looks like you have a SSL issue.
Your node needs to have CA certificate that signed PacketFence RADIUS
certificate in its certificate store or directly PacketFence RADIUS certificate.
Nicolas Quiniou-Briand
Product Support Engineer
[cid:image001.png@01
Hello,
In packetfence.log you provided, I didn’t see any RADIUS request processed.
Are you sure your PacketFence server received traffic from your switch ?
Nicolas Quiniou-Briand
Product Support Engineer
[cid:image002.png@01D774D1.CA2CCEC0]
Office: +33156696210
Akamai Technologies
145 Broadwa
ind regards,
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Zammit, Ludovic
> *Sent:* 08 July 2021 09:28 PM
> *To:* Thapeli Matsabu
> *Cc:* packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* Re: [PacketFence-users] VLAN Enforcement with MAC address
> authentication
>
>
>
?
From: Zammit, Ludovic
Sent: 06 July 2021 02:41 PM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Thapeli Matsabu
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] VLAN Enforcement with MAC address
authentication
Hello there,
Multiple things that you can verify.
1. Make sure in Auditing that the
Ludovic mailto:luza...@akamai.com>>
> Sent: 06 July 2021 02:41 PM
> To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Cc: Thapeli Matsabu mailto:thap...@dataproof.co.za>>
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] VLAN Enforcement
Hello there,
Multiple things that you can verify.
1. Make sure in Auditing that the radius reply for that Mac address contain the
Tunnel-Private-Group-Id = “1"
2. Re-check if the radius CoA is correctly configured to disconnect user
(radius dynamic authorization)
3. Show us your configuration
Hi all,
I have been through this mailing trying to find if someone had this problem
before, but I could not find anything similar.
I am trying to configure VLAN Enforcement with MAC address authentication:
* I am using Cisco 2950 with PF 10 on Centos 7
* I have configured 4 networ
Hello Rafael,
vlan 10 is for registration so it's normal that you don't have internet
access.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2017-06-12 à 16:14, Diogo Rafael via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> Im trying to implement VLAN Enforcement on my environment but im
> having some troubles
>
> I have
Hi,
Im trying to implement VLAN Enforcement on my environment but im having some
troubles
I have to interfaces eth0 that connects to the internet and eth1.
On the interface eth1 i have 3 VLANs, VLAN 10 for registration, VLAN 20 for
Isolation, and VLAN 30 is none.
When a user try to regist
users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: [PacketFence-users] Vlan enforcement mode deployment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 29/07/2016 03:14, Sallee, Jake ha scritto:
> Eloge:
>
> I have been running PF in production for years with a very similar
> setup to the one you ha
ssage.
Best Regards,
Eloge Bapfunya
Network and Systems Administrator
University of Burundi
De : Kisakye Alex [mailto:kisa...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 29 juillet 2016 03:34
À : packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: [PacketFence-users] Vlan enforcement
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 29/07/2016 03:14, Sallee, Jake ha scritto:
> Eloge:
>
> I have been running PF in production for years with a very similar
> setup to the one you have described.
I Jake,
I was tempted to answer myself with a "yes, it's possible. Definite
stem Engineer
> University of Mary Hardin-Baylor
> WWW.UMHB.EDU
>
> 900 College St.
> Belton, Texas
> 76513
>
> Fone: 254-295-4658
> Phax: 254-295-4221
> ________
> From: Eloge Bapfunya
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 2:57 AM
> To: pac
B.EDU
900 College St.
Belton, Texas
76513
Fone: 254-295-4658
Phax: 254-295-4221
From: Eloge Bapfunya
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 2:57 AM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PacketFence-users] Vlan enforcement mode deployment
Hi All,
I come to yo
Hi All,
I come to you for clarification about my project. We had started a project
to deploy packetfence 3 years ago but I gave up as we found we were not
ready for the big project.
This time we are about to revive the project for our institution which is a
university.
We have an hybrid network
Hello Mark,
where is connected the registration interface ?
Is the packetfence network interface card is directly connected to the
switch (like eth1 on a port access 302) ?
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2013-11-13 04:54, Mark Gmeiner a écrit :
So, I've got PacketFence up and running now - partly ...
M
So, I've got PacketFence up and running now - partly ...
My gear:
PF 4.0.6-2 on a Centos 6.4 x64 Server
Extreme Networks Summit X460-48t, XOS 15.3.1.4-patch19, all ports configured
into macregistration-vlan (tag 302)
PacketFence properly learns all the nodes on my network, I can manually
pre-
Francis,
Ignore my two last messages ..., its working now. I did forgot to
remove the NodeBak.pm from the dir.
Cheers
LT
Citando luis torres :
Hi Francis,
this is also what happen when change the Node Status from "Grace"
to "Registered"
May 23 11:56:57 httpd.admin(0) I
Hi Francis,
this is also what happen when change the Node Status from "Grace" to
"Registered"
May 23 11:56:57 httpd.admin(0) INFO: loading Net::MAC::Vendor cache from
/usr/local/pf/conf/oui.txt (pf::util::load_oui)
May 23 11:57:13 httpd.admin(0) INFO: grace expired on violation 121
for no
Hi Francis,
thank you for your support.
Im afraid its still doesnt work as expected..., same behavior. Heres
the packetfence.log.
For a Reg or Unreg Status:
"
May 23 09:40:21 httpd.admin(0) INFO: loading Net::MAC::Vendor cache from
/usr/local/pf/conf/oui.txt (pf::util::load_oui)
M
Hi Luis
On 2013-05-20, at 7:03 AM, luis torres wrote:
> trought the browser , in nodes section, I can only enforce vlans on a
> specific node , between Register or Unregiste, Grace and Pending doesnt do
> nothing..., however if I give the cmd (/usr/local/pf/bin/pfcmd node edit
> 00:0b:5d:23:0
Hi,
trought the browser , in nodes section, I can only enforce vlans on a
specific node , between Register or Unregiste, Grace and Pending doesnt do
nothing..., however if I give the cmd (/usr/local/pf/bin/pfcmd node edit
00:0b:5d:23:02:4d pid=admin,status="grace") on the linux with root user,
Interesting. Thank you for the reply.
Ill take a look and chime in. Oh browser troubles.
T
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 5, 2012, at 4:09 AM, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:46:46AM -0400, Carl "Thomas" Guething wrote:
>> Can someone point me in the direction of where to go f
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:46:46AM -0400, Carl "Thomas" Guething wrote:
>Can someone point me in the direction of where to go for information
>related to troubleshooting the "Web Configurator"
>
>No matter what I do it seems to want to setup inline mode. If I click
>vlan enforcemen
Hi Jake,
I do not see the RADIUS request line or the snmp trap in there. This is
the only reason I can think of right now.
On 2012-08-02 10:13 PM, Sallee, Stephen (Jake) wrote:
> I am getting the following error in the log and my users are not getting
> their vlan switched when their status ch
I am getting the following error in the log and my users are not getting their
vlan switched when their status changes (reg/unreg/violation etc.)
I masked out my MAC address ... I am feeling a bit extra security conscious for
now : )
Aug 02 21:05:37 register.cgi(0) INFO: 10.11.30.15 - XX:XX:XX:
27 matches
Mail list logo