Re: Development on Macintosh

2005-01-31 Thread Logan Shaw
Aaron Ardiri wrote: For now, I don't believe we'll see Simulators on the Mac in the foreseable future, mainly because resources to port the sim seem to be limited at PalmSource. It's safer to keep a cheap PC (and certainly faster than running VPC, unless you have an ass-kicking 2x2.5Ghz G5 with

Re: Development on Macintosh

2005-01-31 Thread Aaron Ardiri
have you considered WINE? http://www.winehq.com/ Err, umm, doesn't WINE only run on x86 machines (which the Mac is not)? Or has that changed? http://www.winehq.com/site/docs/wine-faq/index#IS-WINE-AN-EMULATOR you are right - wine executes x86 in place; but, technically that could be

Re: Development on Macintosh

2005-01-31 Thread C. B. Schofield
On 1/31/05 12:05 PM, Aaron Ardiri wrote: you are right - wine executes x86 in place; but, technically that could be changed; with the right developer initiative to integrate something like bochs or plex86. I think DarWINE is working toward this goal, but they are still in the alpha stages of

Re: Development on Macintosh

2005-01-30 Thread Florent Pillet
For now, I don't believe we'll see Simulators on the Mac in the foreseable future, mainly because resources to port the sim seem to be limited at PalmSource. It's safer to keep a cheap PC (and certainly faster than running VPC, unless you have an ass-kicking 2x2.5Ghz G5 with lots of RAM). Also, I

Re: Development on Macintosh

2005-01-30 Thread Aaron Ardiri
For now, I don't believe we'll see Simulators on the Mac in the foreseable future, mainly because resources to port the sim seem to be limited at PalmSource. It's safer to keep a cheap PC (and certainly faster than running VPC, unless you have an ass-kicking 2x2.5Ghz G5 with lots of RAM).

Re: Development on Macintosh

2005-01-22 Thread Florent Pillet
For development, you can use CodeWarrior for Palm OS v8.0. Even though Metrowerks doesn't update CW for Palm OS anymore, this release works fine and this is actually what I use for development. Keep your Windows box around: you'll need it to run the simulators. I have a small PC (a Shuttle) on

Re: Development on Macintosh

2005-01-22 Thread C. B. Schofield
On 1/22/05 7:21 AM, Florent Pillet wrote: Keep your Windows box around: you'll need it to run the simulators. Yes, it's safe to say you'll still need your Windows box. Until about a year ago, all of my Palm development was 100% Mac-based. I'm crossing my fingers (but not holding out any real

Development on Macintosh

2005-01-11 Thread Laurie Davis
I am currently using Codewarrior on Windows. I also use both Constructor and PilRC. I am contemplating scrapping my Windows machine and buying a Macintosh. It is not clear what my options would be for Palm development. One potential option is to use VirtualPC and continue using Codewarrior. Does

Re: Development on Macintosh

2005-01-11 Thread news
On Jan 11, 2005, at 3:51 AM, Laurie Davis wrote: One potential option is to use VirtualPC and continue using Codewarrior. Does anyone have experience with this option? I tried that for awhile, then went out and bought a Windows box. It was just too slow. Regards, Steve Mann --

Re: Development on Macintosh

2005-01-11 Thread Ted Peters
You can use CodeWarrior for Palm OS v8.0 which is Mac OS X native. This tool works very well for developing 68K Palm applications. The Palm OS Emulator also works well on OS X, and ROMs are available up through OS 4.1. CodeWarrior comes with Constructor for resource editing, although I prefer