I would like to work with the ParaView 3.8 branch. What is the
"official" way to get the code? Git or CVS? The Git server at GitHub
seems NOT to have all the source code for the branch. Is the CVS
server still active?
Thanks
___
Mike J
The official way is to use cvs until the transition occurs. I am using cvs
for building the 3.8 release binaries because cvsexport is just another
level of complexity I don't want to deal with, especially for merging fixes
onto the branch. I am not certain why GitHub didn't import the entire branch
Mike,
We are working on the official ParaView/VTK Git repositories. These
will soon replace the current github repository. Though may still be
co-hosted on gitorious and/or github, it will have a totally different
history from the current version.
Until that happens, the current github repo may no
Thanks guys. That is what I was thinking but just wanted to be sure.
--
Mike Jackson
On Apr 6, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
Mike,
We are working on the official ParaView/VTK Git repositories. These
will soon replace the current github repository. Though may still be
co-hosted on
Hello,
I'm trying to generate data in the programmablesource with time.
till now a can produce the data, fill the output, but I do not know
how to put the time information. (I read that I have to correctly set
the DATA_TIME_STEPS, TIME_RANGE, TIME_STEPS and the TimestepValues
variables).
That's crazy :-)
You need something like this:
for i in range(x):
self.GetExecutive().GetOutputInformation().GetInformationObject(0).Append(vtkStreamingDemandDrivePipeline.TIME_STEPS(),
t[i])
in the RequestInformation() script. Then to get UPDATE_TIME_STEPS(),
something like:
i = self.GetExec
Hi,
I am trying to read in a netCDF file using Paraview 3.6.2. It can 'see' the
netCDF file, but when I attempt to read in the file by pressing 'Apply', I get
the following error message:
ERROR: In
/home/kitware/ParaView3/Utilities/BuildScripts/ParaView-3.6/ParaView3/Servers/Filters/vtkTex
I have a bit of code where I read in a data file, extract a small portion of
it and then integrate the variables of the extracted portion. In my python
code I then fetch the data from the server with the intent to write it out
to a log file. The issue that I have come across is when I run my scri
Try calling avgData.UpdatePipeline(). The filters are not actually executed
until there is demand. Usually a call to Render() causes this demand, but
for IntegrateVariables there is nothing to render. Not sure if Fetch is
supposed to automatically called UpdatePipeline or not.
Pat
On Tue, Apr
Pat,
Thanks for the reply. I tried giving an UpdatePipeline() call, but seemed
to be the same result.
Any other thoughts?
Matt
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:07 PM, pat marion wrote:
> Try calling avgData.UpdatePipeline(). The filters are not actually
> executed until there is demand. Usually a ca
It sounds like you are reading in an array with 0 or 1 dimensions (not
including time). Although the reader should happily create an image data of
that structure, the standard rendering views only understand image data of 2 or
3 dimensions. Hence you get the error.
If you want to see the data
Another interesting anomaly. If I use the shell and run the script once, so
I have a pipeline of three objects, I get zeros. If I then run it again
immediately so I have a second pipeline of the same three objects, it then
outputs correctly.
Matt
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Matthew Cragun
Hello all,
I've been trying to generate a development tree of ParaView (based on
CVS head as of a few hours ago) that I can distribute to other
in-house developers so that they don't have to build ParaView
themselves. I've been following the instructions here:
http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
Hi,
Thank you Ken for responding.
I suspect that your diagnosis is correct; the root of the problem, I believe,
is that I am reading in netCDF data that follows the CF convention. In
particular, the grid is an unstructured triangular 2D grid ('poly data' grid in
the venacular of paraview).
Hi,
With the announcement of moving to Git and the upcoming 3.8 release,
I'd like to pose the following question
Currently, to build plugins, we need to build Paraview itself
http://paraview.org/Wiki/Plugin_HowTo
Are there plans to architect Paraview so that it ships with
suf
There are already plans to ship paraview with sufficient
libraries/headers starting the upcoming ParaView 3.8. Separate
downloads will be available from the ParaView website for those who
want the development version of the binaries.
Utkarsh
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Nicholas Yue wrote:
>
16 matches
Mail list logo