Hello,
Thank you for your answer.
It WAS a multiblock dataset, but as you mentioned it as a potential issue, I
made it even simpler : one temporal dataset with a unique block of 8 points and
2 fields (displacement=DEPL and velocity=VITE). No more success for me, the
ParticlePath filter proves
Somehow I had completely missed that filter ! Thank you, it does exactly what I
need :
[cid:image001.png@01D00FA3.E43922E0]
Thanks also to Andy Bauer for his time.
Jerome
De : ParaView [mailto:paraview-boun...@paraview.org] De la part de Richter,
Christian, Dipl.-Ing.
Envoyé : mercredi 3
works perfectly, thank you!
On 03.12.2014 19:49, Sebastien Jourdain wrote:
View is not valid at the point you get it.
from paraview.simple import *
exporters=servermanager.createModule(exporters)
source=Cone()
Show()
render=Render()
x3dExporter=exporters.X3DExporter(FileName=foo.x3d)
Hello,
I am using Paraview's Stats filter to run Principal Component Analysis on a
3D mesh (converted to a point cloud). My problem is that I'd like to get
the transformation matrix and I have been unable to figure out where it's
located. More specifically, I want to supply this transform (as
Mike,
hd5 1.8.13 is now the version bundled with ParaView (the git version and
superbuild).
Best regards,
Dan
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com
wrote:
Not recent enough.
Noted.
PS: We are just trying to get everyone to build ParaView on their
THanks for the update. Just FYI, they just released 1.8.14 a few weeks back.
Any chances of just jumping to that version?
Thanks for all the work
Mike Jackson
On Dec 4, 2014, at 10:49 PM, Dan Lipsa dan.li...@kitware.com wrote:
Mike,
hd5 1.8.13 is now the version bundled with ParaView (the
I was wondering if there was a way to use the traditional scientific
notation (1x10^16) instead of the E notation (1E16) in the axis labels
(for example in a simple XY plot). I see there are three formats Mixed,
Scientific and Fixed that Paraview allows but a lot of journals do not
accept the
