Re: [Paraview] Customize programmable filters: copy arrays

2015-11-17 Thread Joachim Pouderoux
Dear Jean-Michel, Yes, use PassData(), it will shallow copy the arrays from the input to the output, then you can add new arrays to your output. DeepCopy will works too but the input arrays will be copied and the copy will be affected to the output. Use it only if you intend to change the arrays a

[Paraview] ParaViewWeb on remote machine w/ port forwarding

2015-11-17 Thread Ken Mankoff
Hi, I'm trying to get ParaViewWeb (PVW) running. I've read the documentation and have the QuickStart section working, but am still having trouble with a more complicated setup. My IT support team has the web-facing servers as VMs running a slighly outdated CentOS. I don't think this is a good

Re: [Paraview] ParaViewWeb on remote machine w/ port forwarding

2015-11-17 Thread Scott Wittenburg
Hi Ken, Before doing much debugging, can you check and report back here what version of Apache you're running on the web-facing servers? Cheers, Scott On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Ken Mankoff wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to get ParaViewWeb (PVW) running. I've read the documentation > an

[Paraview] xdmf with field data in multiple files

2015-11-17 Thread Peter Brady
I've been using an xdmf file like the following: 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 1.22718E-02 1.22959E-02 CollectionType="Temporal"> 0.0E+00 1.00399E-01

Re: [Paraview] ParaViewWeb on remote machine w/ port forwarding

2015-11-17 Thread Scott Wittenburg
The reason I ask is that Apache 2.4.7 is the oldest version in which all the required modules are present and work correctly. You can see the list of needed modules here: http://www.paraview.org/ParaView3/Doc/Nightly/www/js-doc/index.html#!/guide/ubuntu_14_04-section-5 Cheers, Scott On Tue, Nov

Re: [Paraview] ParaViewWeb on remote machine w/ port forwarding

2015-11-17 Thread Ken Mankoff
Hi Scott, IT says 2.4.6, but that they have all the modules listed in your requirements. We're considering two approaches since their webserver VMs also don't have good graphics virtualization: 1) Some ParaView software running on the the web VM that has another computer doing the rendering for i

Re: [Paraview] ParaViewWeb on remote machine w/ port forwarding

2015-11-17 Thread Scott Wittenburg
Hi Ken, Yes, ParaViewWeb supports either option, though option 1 seems better in your case. Additionally, unless you have your own job management software running on the rendering computer, you may want to look at using the Python launcher we provide. See this document: http://www.paraview.o

Re: [Paraview] Differences between OpenGL and OpenGL2 versions of ParaView

2015-11-17 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit
Ken, what Adam has is a multiblock dataset with field data array named "Color" (with certain blocks missing this array). Now when you color by this array and then uncheck "Map Scalars", I get the attached images. I'd contend that 5.0 with OpenGL2 rendering is correct. In 4.4 it would just bleed som

Re: [Paraview] Differences between OpenGL and OpenGL2 versions of ParaView

2015-11-17 Thread Ken Martin
Yes, thank goodness, I thought this dataset looked familiar. Now I remember looking into this a while back and yes, the decision we landed on was as you specified. The new code is different from the old version, but to me a much safer and better approach. If the data is missing for a block we use t

Re: [Paraview] xdmf with field data in multiple files

2015-11-17 Thread Peter Brady
So it seems that this can be achieved using spatial grid collections. Here's what I have now: -1.00 -0.50 -0.50 0.01574803 0.01587301 0.01587301 0.007874 -0.50 -0.50

Re: [Paraview] ParaViewWeb on remote machine w/ port forwarding

2015-11-17 Thread Sebastien Jourdain
Hi Ken, One thing to be aware is that Apache 2.4.6 has a bug in the rewrite module for web socket. Hence the need to have 2.4.7+. Seb On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Scott Wittenburg < scott.wittenb...@kitware.com> wrote: > Hi Ken, > >Yes, ParaViewWeb supports either option, though optio